全身麻醉联合超声引导下椎旁神经阻滞用于食管癌胸腹腔镜手术中的价值

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2024.10.029

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (1216 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要【目的】探讨全身麻醉(全麻)联合超声引导下椎旁神经阻滞(USG-PVB)用于食管癌胸腹腔镜手术中的价值。【方法】86例食管癌患者,随机分为观察组与对照组,每组43 例。两组均行胸腹腔镜手术,对照组采用全身麻醉,观察组采用全麻联合 USG-PVB 麻醉。比较两组患者术中药物用量及围术期指标;于术后4 h(T₁)、术后24 h(T₂)、术后48 h(T₃)采用Ricker镇静-躁动评分(SAS)评估患者躁动情况,以视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估患者疼痛情况;比较两组不同时点免疫功能[CD3⁺、CD4⁺、自然杀伤细胞(NK)]水平;比较两组并发症发生情况。【结果】观察组丙泊酚、瑞芬太尼、舒芬太尼术中用量均低于对照组(P<0.05),去氧肾上腺素用量高于对照组(P<0.05),两组麻黄碱、尼卡地平用量比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组拔管时间、清醒时间、术后住院时间显著短于对照组(P<0.05),两组手术时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组T₁、T₂、T₃时SAS、VAS评分显著低于对照组(P<0.05),CD3⁺、CD4⁺、NK水平显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。两组并发症总发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。【结论】在食管癌胸腹腔镜术中应用全麻联合USG-PVB麻醉方案,可有效减少术中药物使用量,有利于患者术后恢复,同时能够减轻患者术后躁动及疼痛,对免疫功能影响小,且并发症发生较少,值得临床推广应用。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	折甜甜
	田龙飞
	孙逸飞

关键词 ：食管肿瘤/外科学, 麻醉,全身, 胸腔镜检查, 腹腔镜检查, 神经传导阻滞

Abstract：【Objective】 To investigate the value of general anesthesia combined with ultrasound-guided paravertebral nerve block (USG-PVB) in thoracic laparoscopic surgery for esophageal cancer. 【Methods】 A total of 86 patients who underwent thoracic laparoscopic surgery for esophageal cancer were randomly divided into the observation group and the control group, 43 cases in each group. Both groups underwent thoracic laparoscopic surgery, the control group was given general anesthesia, and the observation group was given general anesthesia combined with USG-PVB anesthesia. Intraoperative drug dosage and perioperative indexes were compared between the two groups. At 4 h(T₁), 24 h(T₂) and 48 h(T₃), restlessness was assessed by Ricker sedation-agitation score (SAS) and pain was assessed by visual analog scale (VAS). The levels of immune function [CD3⁺, CD4⁺, natural killer cells (NK)] were compared between the two groups at different time points. The incidence of complications was compared between the two groups. 【Results】The intraoperative dosage of propofol, remifentanil and sufentanil in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P<0.05), and the dosage of deoxyadrenaline was significantly higher than that in the control group (P<0.05). There was no statistical significance in the dosage of ephedrine and nicadipine between two groups (P>0.05). The extubation time, waking time and postoperative hospitalization time in the observation group were significantly shorter than those in the control group (P<0.05), and there was no statistical significance in the operation time between the two groups (P>0.05). The SAS and VAS scores of the observation group at T₁, T₂ and T₃ were significantly lower than those of the control group (P<0.05). The levels of CD3⁺, CD4⁺ and NK were significantly higher than those of the control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the total incidence of complications between the two groups (P>0.05). 【Conclusion】The application of general anesthesia combined with USG-PVB anesthesia in thoracic laparoscopic surgery for esophageal cancer can effectively reduce the use of intraoperative drugs, which is conducive to postoperative recovery of patients, and can alleviate postoperative agitation and pain of patients, with little impact on immune function and fewer complications, which is worthy of clinical promotion and application.

Key words： Esophageal Neoplasms/SU Anesthesia, General Thoracoscopy Laparoscopy Nerve Block

收稿日期: 2023-08-16

中图分类号:

R735.1

通讯作者: *E-mail:zhetiantian2023@163.com

引用本文:

折甜甜, 田龙飞, 孙逸飞. 全身麻醉联合超声引导下椎旁神经阻滞用于食管癌胸腹腔镜手术中的价值[J]. 医学临床研究, 2024, 41(10): 1557-1560.
ZHE Tiantian, TIAN Longfei, SUN Yifei. Value of General Anesthesia Combined with Ultrasound-guided Paravertebral Nerve Block in Thoracic Laparoscopic Surgery for Esophageal Cancer. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RESEARCH, 2024, 41(10): 1557-1560.

链接本文:

http://journal07.magtech.org.cn/yxlcyj/CN/10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2024.10.029 或 http://journal07.magtech.org.cn/yxlcyj/CN/Y2024/V41/I10/1557

[1] FUJWARA H, SHOZAKI A, KONISHI H, et al. Transmediastinal approach for esophageal cancer: a new trend toward radical surgery[J].Asian J Endosc Surg,2019,12(1):30-36.
[2] WANG K X, ZHONG J, LIU Q W, et al. A propensity score-matched analysis of thoracolaparoscopic vs openmckeown's esophagectomy[J].Ann Thorac Surg,2022,113(2):473-481.
[3] 梁国庆,谷亚利.单腔气管插管全身麻醉应用于二氧化碳气胸下胸腔镜食管癌根治术的麻醉效果研究[J].贵州医药,2020,44(3):401-403.
[4] YAMAN F, TUGLU D. Analgesic efficacy of ultrasound guided paravertebral block in percutaneousnephrolithotomy patients: a randomized controlled clinical study[J].BMC Anesthesiol,2020,20(1):250.
[5] BENEDICT N, FELBINGER M, RIDENOUR T, et al. Correlation of patient-reported outcomes of sedation and sedation assessment scores in critically ill patients[J].J Crit Care,2014,29(6):1132.
[6] KANE R L,BERSHADSKY B,ROCKWOOD T, et al. Visual Analog Scale pain reporting was standardized[J].J Clin Epidemiol,2005,58(6):618-623.
[7] 张瑞,张亚玲,陈玉龙,等.基于Logistic回归分析合并家族史的食管癌发病危险因素门[J].中医学报,2022,37(12):2587-2592.
[8] LIU G Y, ZHANG J X, RONG L, et al. Esophageal superficial adenosquamous carcinoma resected by endoscopic submucosal dissection: a rare case report[J].World J Clin Cases,2021,9(6):1336-1342.
[9] 蒋康,陆恒,廖婉玉,等.内镜下支架置入治疗食管癌放疗后食管狭窄的疗效观察[J].东南国防医药,2020,22(2):200-202.
[10] 钟惠,张家运,李金凤,等,超声引导下胸椎旁神经阻滞复合全身麻醉在乳腺癌手术中的应用效果观察[J].山东医药,2022,62(23):89-92.
[11] 苏文婷,廖燕凌,林群,等,胸椎旁神经阻滞复合全麻对老年高血压患者肺癌根治术中血压和心率的影响[J].中华高血压杂志,2021,29(5):476-480.
[12] 赵义,龙明绵,黄桂华,等,超声引导胸椎旁神经阻滞复合全麻在老年单孔胸腔镜肺癌根治术中的应用价值[J].中国老年学杂志,2021,41(7):1428-1431.
[13] 耿仕涛,张尊月,陈欣,等.阿片类药物调节机体免疫系统的研究进展[J].中国药理学与毒理学杂志,2020,34(5):381-388.