Abstract：【Objective】 To investigate the impact of video laryngoscopy-guided endotracheal intubation on resuscitation time and prognosis in prehospital emergency care patients. 【Methods】 A total of 112 prehospital emergency care patients requiring artificial airway establishment were included in this study. They were divided into an observation group and a control group,with 56 patients in each group. The control group received conventional laryngoscopy-guided tracheal intubation,while the observation group received video laryngoscopy-guided tracheal intubation. The number of intubation attempts,intubation time,time to successful intubation,glottis exposure time,and resuscitation time were compared between the two groups. Blood glucose,oxygen saturation (SaO2),and blood pressure levels were compared at 3 minutes after intubation. Intubation success rate,resuscitation success rate,24 hours survival rate,and incidence of complications were also compared. 【Results】 The observation group had significantly fewer intubation attempts,shorter intubation time,time to successful intubation,glottis exposure time,and resuscitation time compared to the control group (P<0.05). At 3 minutes after intubation,the observation group had higher SaO2 levels,systolic blood pressure,and diastolic blood pressure compared to the control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in blood glucose levels at 3 minutes after intubation between the two groups (P>0.05). The observation group had higher intubation success rate (94.64%),resuscitation success rate (37.50%),and 24 hours survival rate (25.00%) compared to the control group (80.36%,19.64% and 10.71%,respectively) (P<0.05). The incidence of complications was significantly lower in the observation group (3.57%) compared to the control group (16.07%) (P<0.05). 【Conclusion】 Video laryngoscopy-guided endotracheal intubation in prehospital emergency care patients can shorten intubation and resuscitation time,improve 24 hours survival rate,and enhance short-term prognosis.
杨中林, 熊小飞, 张尧. 可视性喉镜插管用于院前急救对患者复苏时间及预后的影响[J]. 医学临床研究, 2023, 40(6): 909-912.
YANG Zhong-lin, XIONG Xiao-fei, ZHANG Yao. The Impact of Video Laryngoscopy-Guided Endotracheal Intubation on Resuscitation Time and Prognosis in Prehospital Emergency Care Patients. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RESEARCH, 2023, 40(6): 909-912.
[1] YONG S A,CHAOU C H,YU S R,et al. Video assisted laryngoscope facilitates intubation skill learning in the emergency department[J].J Acute Med,2020,10(2):60-69.
[2] MANIRAJAN M,BIDKAR P U,SIVAKUMAR R K,et al. Comparison of paediatric king vision videolaryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope for elective tracheal intubation in children of age less than 1 year:A randomised clinical trial[J].Indian J Anaesth,2020,64(11):943-948.
[3] ROH G U,KIM J Y.Comparing videolaryngoscope and direct laryngoscope use for nasotracheal intubation in patients with manual in-line stabilization[J].Can J Anesth,2020,67(2):268-269.
[4] GO U R,HYUN J K,KYUNG C L,et al. Randomized comparison of McGrath MAC videolaryngoscope,pentax airway scope,and macintosh direct laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation in patients with manual in-line stabilization[J].Can J Anaesth,2019,66(10):1213-1220.
[5] 罗红敏. 电子可视喉镜与直接喉镜对ICU气管插管成功率的影响:一项随机对照临床试验[J].中华危重病急救医学,2017,29(5):476.
[6] 殷占君,王世民.McGrath(R) MAC可视喉镜与直接喉镜辅助光棒引导在模拟颈椎制动患者气管插管应用[J].中国急救医学,2018,38(1):147-148.
[7] 王万灵,王灵,王振华,等. HC可视喉镜、直接喉镜在气管插管中的应用效果比较[J].山东医药,2015,55(11):39-40.
[8] 朱玉梅,夏晶,汤海俊,等. 直接喉镜、光棒和视可尼可视喉镜在老年患者气管插管中的应用比较[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2018,34(4):395-396.
[9] 邹良亮,彭德良.可视喉镜与普通喉镜在ICU非气道困难患者气管插管中的应用比较[J].南昌大学学报(医学版),2016,56(4):34-36.
[10] 曹丽丽,牛丙寅. 可视喉镜在急诊危重症患者气管插管中的应用[J].中南医学科学杂志,2016,44(6):681-684.
[11] 梁开远,黄光梅,李泽均,等. UE可视喉镜在急诊剖宫产患儿床边气管插管术中的应用[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2020,36(6):559-562.
2023, Vol. 40 
