医学临床研究
  2025年6月7日 星期六           首 页    |    期刊简介    |    编委会    |    投稿指南    |    期刊订阅    |    广告合作    |    留言板    |    联系我们    |    English
医学临床研究  2022, Vol. 39 Issue (3): 359-362    DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2022.03.011
  论著 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
胫骨远端后外侧入路与前内侧入路治疗Pilon骨折临床疗效比较
戴杰1, 欧阳跃平2**, 杨柳榭1, 李振环1
1.上海市静安区闸北中心医院骨科,上海 静安 200070;
2.上海市长征医院创伤骨科,上海 黄浦 200001
Clinical Comparison of Distal Tibial Posterolateral Approach and Anteromedial Approach in the Treatment of Pilon Fracture
DAI Jie, OUYANG Yue-ping, YANG Liu-xie, et al
Department of orthopedics, Shanghai Jing'an District Zhabei Central Hospital, Jing'an Shanghai 200070
全文: PDF (1134 KB)   HTML (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 【目的】探讨胫骨远端后外侧入路与前内侧入路对Pilon骨折效果及围术期并发症的影响。【方法】选取2018年1月至2021年1月上海市静安区闸北中心医院骨科收治的78例Pilon骨折患者,依照随机数字表法分为观察组和对照组。对照组采用胫骨远端前内侧入路,观察组采用胫骨远端后外侧入路。比较两组基本资料,手术指标,恢复情况及围术期并发症。【结果】观察组患者手术时间较对照组更长、骨折愈合时间较对照组更短,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后1个月,观察组视觉模拟疼痛评分(VAS)低于对照组,美国足踝外科协会(AOFAS)踝关节评分高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后6个月,两组VAS均低于术后1个月,而对照组术后6个月AOFAS踝关节评分高于术后1个月,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组的总优良率高于对照组(87.18% vs 66.67%,χ2=4.622,P<0.05);两组围术期并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(10.26% vs 17.95%,χ2=0.953,P>0.05)。【结论】与胫骨远端前内侧入路相比,后外侧入路治疗Pilon骨折能够缩短骨折愈合时间,减轻术后疼痛,改善AOFAS踝关节评分,术后关节功能恢复效果好,安全可靠。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
戴杰
欧阳跃平
杨柳榭
李振环
关键词 胫骨骨折/治疗治疗结果    
Abstract:【Objective】To investigate the effects of distal tibial posterolateral approach and anteromedial approach on Pilon fracture and perioperative complications. 【Methods】A total of 78 patients with Pilon fracture treated in the Department of orthopedics, Zhabei Central Hospital, Jing'an District, Shanghai from January 2018 to January 2021 were randomly divided into observation group and control group. The control group adopted the anteromedial approach of distal tibia, and the observation group adopted the posterolateral approach of distal tibia. The basic data, surgical indexes, recovery and perioperative complications of the two groups were compared. 【Results】The operation time of the observation group was longer and the fracture healing time was shorter than that of the control group (P<0.05). One month after operation, the visual analogue pain score (VAS) of the observation group was lower than that of the control group, and the ankle score of the American foot and ankle surgery association (AOFAS) was higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). At 6 months after operation, the VAS of the two groups was lower than that of 1 month after operation, while the AOFAS ankle score of the control group was higher than that of 1 month after operation (P<0.05); The total excellent rate of the observation group was higher than that of the control group(87.18% vs 66.67%,χ2=4.622,P<0.05);There was no significant difference in the incidence of perioperative complications between the two groups (10.26% vs 17.95%,χ2=0.953,P>0.05).【Conclusion】Compared with the anteromedial approach of the distal tibia, the posterolateral approach in the treatment of Pilon fracture can shorten the fracture healing time, reduce postoperative pain, improve AOFAS ankle score, and have a good effect on the recovery of joint function, which is safe and reliable.
Key wordsTibial Fractures/TH    Treatment Outcome
收稿日期: 2022-01-12     
中图分类号:  R683.423  
基金资助:静安区卫生健康委员会医学科研课题(编号:2014QN01)
通讯作者: ** E-mail:81885632oyyp@sina.com   
引用本文:   
戴杰, 欧阳跃平, 杨柳榭, 李振环. 胫骨远端后外侧入路与前内侧入路治疗Pilon骨折临床疗效比较[J]. 医学临床研究, 2022, 39(3): 359-362.
DAI Jie, OUYANG Yue-ping, YANG Liu-xie, et al. Clinical Comparison of Distal Tibial Posterolateral Approach and Anteromedial Approach in the Treatment of Pilon Fracture. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 39(3): 359-362.
链接本文:  
http://journal07.magtech.org.cn/yxlcyj/CN/10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2022.03.011     或     http://journal07.magtech.org.cn/yxlcyj/CN/Y2022/V39/I3/359
版权所有 © 2013 医学临床研究杂志社  湘ICP备13012052号-1
办公地址:湖南省长沙市芙蓉区新军路43号煤炭大院主办公楼6楼621、623、632、636室 邮编:410011 电话(传真):0731-84824007 E-mail:jcr_cs.hn@vip.163.com
技术支持:北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn