医学临床研究
  2025年4月5日 星期六           首 页    |    期刊简介    |    编委会    |    投稿指南    |    期刊订阅    |    广告合作    |    留言板    |    联系我们    |    English
医学临床研究  2021, Vol. 38 Issue (5): 740-742    DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2021.05.029
  论著 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
经皮椎体后凸成形术与经皮椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的疗效对比
张善成
商水县人民医院,河南 周口 466100
Comparison of PVP and PKP in the Treatment of OVCF
ZHANG Shan-cheng
Shangshui people's Hospital ,Zhoukou Henan 466100
全文: PDF (1119 KB)   HTML (0 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 【目的】 比较经皮椎体后凸成形术(percutaneous kyphoplasty,PKP)与经皮椎体成形术(percutaneous vertebroplasty,PVP)治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折(osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures ,OVCF)患者的临床疗效。【方法】 选取76例OVCF患者,按照手术方式不同分为PKP组(41例)与PVP组(35例),比较两组临床疗效。【结果】 两组患者术后椎体前缘高度均显著高于术前,后凸Cobb角和视觉模拟评分(VAS)均显著低于术前(P<0.05),且PKP组优于PVP组。与治疗前比较,两组患者治疗后1个月Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)评分均显著下降,日本骨科协会(JOA)下腰痛评分均显著提高(P<0.05),且PKP组变化更为明显(P<0.05);相比PVP组,PKP组骨水泥渗漏率下降,而平均骨水泥注入量和治疗费用增多(P<0.05)。两组邻近椎体骨折发生率和术后VAS评分比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。【结论】 PKP与PVP均可安全、有效改善OVCF患者临床疗效,减轻患者痛苦,但相比PVP,虽PKP治疗费用相对较高,但可更好地恢复椎体形态、提高椎体高度、降低骨水泥渗漏的发生,临床可根据患者的实际情况选取合适的手术方式。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
张善成
关键词 骨质疏松/并发症脊柱骨折/病因学脊柱骨折/外科学椎体成形术/方法椎体后凸成形术/方法    
Abstract【Objective】 To compare the clinical efficacy of percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) and percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF). 【Methods】 A total of 76 patients with OVCF were divided into the PKP group (41 cases) and the PVP group (35 cases) according to different operation methods. Clinical efficacy was compared between the two groups. 【Results】 Compared to before operation, the height of anterior vertebral body in both groups were higher after operation, and the kyphosis Cobb angle and visual analogue scale (VAS) were lower(P<0.05). Compared to before treatment, the Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores of the two groups decreased significantly 1 month after treatment, and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) low back pain scores increased significantly (P<0.05). Compared to the PVP group, ODI scores of the PKP group decreased significantly, and the JOA scores increased significantly (P<0.05). Compared to the PVP group, the PKP group had higher anterior vertebral height, lower kyphosis Cobb angle, lower bone cement leakage rate, and higher bone cement injection volume and average treatment cost (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adjacent vertebral fracture and postoperative VAS score between the two groups (P>0.05). 【Conclusion】 Both PKP and PVP can safely and effectively improve the clinical efficacy of OVCF patients and relieve the pain of patients. Compared to PVP, PKP has higher treatment cost, but it can better restore the vertebral shape, improve the vertebral height, and reduce the occurrence of bone cement leakage.
Key wordsOsteoporosis/CO    Spinal Fractures/ET    Spinal Fractures/SU    Vertebroplasty/MT    Kyphoplasty/MT
收稿日期: 2021-01-25     
中图分类号:  R683  
引用本文:   
张善成. 经皮椎体后凸成形术与经皮椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的疗效对比[J]. 医学临床研究, 2021, 38(5): 740-742.
ZHANG Shan-cheng. Comparison of PVP and PKP in the Treatment of OVCF. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 38(5): 740-742.
链接本文:  
http://journal07.magtech.org.cn/yxlcyj/CN/10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2021.05.029     或     http://journal07.magtech.org.cn/yxlcyj/CN/Y2021/V38/I5/740
版权所有 © 2013 医学临床研究杂志社  湘ICP备13012052号-1
办公地址:湖南省长沙市芙蓉区新军路43号煤炭大院主办公楼6楼621、623、632、636室 邮编:410011 电话(传真):0731-84824007 E-mail:jcr_cs.hn@vip.163.com
技术支持:北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn