IMR对NSTEMI患者左心室重塑的相关性分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2021.08.016

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (1263 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要【目的】探讨冠状动脉微循环阻力指数(IMR)对非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)患者左心室重塑的相关性。【方法】选择2018年1月至2019年1月本院心内科收治的112例NSTEMI患者,根据是患者PCI术后否存在左心室重塑将其分为重塑组(n=23)和非重塑组(n=89)。随访介入术后及出院后12个月,记录两组患者左心室射血分数(LVEF)、左心室舒张末期容积(LVEDV)、左心室收缩末期容积(LVESV),比较两组患者心功能,分析IMR与心功能的相关性,采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析IMR识别左心室重塑的临床价值。【结果】出院前,两组患者LVEF、LVEDV及LVESV比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后12个月,重塑组患者LVEF低于出院前,LVEDV、LVESV显著高于出院前;重塑组患者LVEF显著低于非重塑组,LVEDV显著高于非重塑组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。重塑组患者IMR为(38.75±6.31)U,显著高于非重塑组(23.47±4.96)U,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。Pearson相关性分析显示,IMR与LVEF呈显著负相关(r=-0.296,P=0.038),与LVEDV及LVESV呈显著正相关(r分别为0.492、0.371,P分别为0.018、0.047)。ROC曲线分析显示,IMR预测NSTEMI患者PCI术后12个月发生左心室重塑价值为(AUC)(95%CI)为0.86(0.79~0.95)。【结论】IMR是潜在的预测NSTEMI患者预后的指标,临床医师可根据患者IMR及时给予有效治疗措施,对临床改善患者预后具有重要临床意义。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	蒙娟
	耿珏
	刘振国

关键词 ：非ST段抬高型心肌梗死, 心室功能, 左, 冠状动脉循环

Abstract：【Objective】To investigate the correlation between coronary microcirculation resistance index (IMR) and left ventricular remodeling in patients with non ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). 【Methods】A total of 112 patients with NSTEMI treated in the Department of Cardiology of our hospital from January 2018 to January 2019 were selected. According to whether there was left ventricular remodeling after PCI, they were divided into remodeling group (n=23) and non remodeling group (n=89). 12 months after interventional surgery and discharge, the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end diastolic volume (LVEDV) and left ventricular end systolic volume (LVESV) of the two groups were recorded. The cardiac function of the two groups was compared, the correlation between IMR and cardiac function was analyzed, and the clinical value of IMR in identifying left ventricular remodeling was analyzed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. 【Results】 Before discharge, there was no significant difference in LVEF, LVEDV and LVESV between the two groups (P>0.05). 12 months after operation, LVEF in the remodeling group was lower than that before discharge, and LVEDV and LVESV were significantly higher than that before discharge; LVEF in the remodeling group was significantly lower than that in the non remodeling group, and LVEDV was significantly higher than that in the non remodeling group (all P<0.05). The IMR of patients in remodeling group was (38.75 ± 6.31) u, which was significantly higher than that in non remodeling group (23.47 ± 4.96) U (P<0.05). Pearson correlation analysis showed that IMR was significantly negatively correlated with LVEF (r=-0.296, P=0.038), and positively correlated with LVEDV and LVESV (r=0.492 and 0.371, P=0.018 and 0.047, respectively). ROC curve analysis showed that the value of IMR in predicting left ventricular remodeling 12 months after PCI in NSTEMI patients was (AUC) (95%CI) 0.86 (0.79~0.95). 【Conclusion】IMR is a potential index to predict the prognosis of NSTEMI patients. Clinicians can give effective treatment measures in time according to IMR, which is of great clinical significance to improve the prognosis of patients.

Key words： Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction Ventricular Function, Left Coronary Circulation

收稿日期: 2019-09-29

中图分类号:

R542.22

基金资助:汉中市中心医院院级科研基金项目(YK2001)

通讯作者: ** E-mail:mj20210222@163.com

引用本文:

蒙娟, 耿珏, 刘振国. IMR对NSTEMI患者左心室重塑的相关性分析[J]. 医学临床研究, 2021, 38(8): 1173-1175.
MENG Juan, GENG Jue, LIU Zhen-guo. Correlation Between IMR and Left Ventricular Remodeling in Patients with NSTEMI. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 38(8): 1173-1175.

链接本文:

http://journal07.magtech.org.cn/yxlcyj/CN/10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2021.08.016 或 http://journal07.magtech.org.cn/yxlcyj/CN/Y2021/V38/I8/1173

[1] 闫菊英,李烁烁.法舒地尔联合重组人脑利钠肽对急性心肌梗死患者PCI术后心功能及细胞凋亡因子的影响[J].医学临床研究,2021,38(1):94-96.
[2] 张健发, 刘婕, 黄定. PCI术中联合使用腺苷与盐酸替罗非班对老年急性ST段高型心肌梗死心肌微循环及心功能的影响[J].中国老年学杂志, 2014, 34(12): 3231-3233.
[3] 张玉斌, 傅向华. 急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者直接经皮冠状动脉介入后心肌微循环灌注障碍的相关因素分析[J].中国循环杂志, 2017, 32(z1): 96.
[4] 陈泽, 李佳维. 冠状动脉微循环阻力对STEMI介入术后左心室重塑的影响[J].中国医药导报, 2021, 18(11): 58-61.
[5] ROFFI M, PATRONO C, COLLET J P, et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: Task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) [J].Eur Heart J,2016, 37(3): 267-315.
[6] 尤威, 杨志健, 叶飞. 微循环阻力指数用于早期预测冠心病患者经皮冠状动脉介入术后微循环损伤[J].中华心血管病杂志, 2019, 47(11): 894-900.
[7] ZILE M R. Relationship between the temporal profile of plasma microRNA and left ventricular remodeling in patients after myocardial infarction [J].Circ Cardiovasc Genet,2011,4(6):614.
[8] 岑锦明, 杨希立, 郭军, 等. 冠状动脉微循环阻力指数与传统心血管危险因素、Hcy及LP-PLA2 的相关性研究[J].中国现代医学杂志, 2018, 28(33): 64-70.
[9] 单锐婷,聂伟,张文琪. 冠状动脉微循环障碍研究现状[J].中国实用内科杂志,2017,37(12):1106-1110.
[10] 吴彩凤,徐日新,张强, 等. 微循环阻力指数评估急性前壁ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者急诊冠状动脉介入治疗预后的价值及相关影响因素[J].实用临床医药杂志, 2019, 23(16): 65-69.
[11] 姜荣泸. 微循环阻力指数对冠状动脉完全闭塞病变患者择期行PCI治疗的预测价值及影响因素分析 [J].岭南心血管病杂志, 2016, 22(6): 645-648, 655.