Abstract：【Objective】 To investigate the efficacy and prognosis of digital subtraction angiography (DSA) interventional fusion therapy in patients with early stage femoral head necrosis. 【Methods】 A total of 118 patients with early stage femoral head necrosis who received treatment in our hospital from January 2016 to June 2017 were selected as the research subject. According to the different treatment methods, patients were divided into the observation group (n=68) and the control group (n=60). Patients in the observation group received DSA interventional fusion therapy, while patients in the control group received core decompression and bone grafting. The clinical efficacy and prognosis of patients in the two groups were analyzed and compared. 【Results】 Before treatment, there was no statistically significant differences of both Harris score for hip function and the pain index Ficat score between the two groups (P>0.05). After 6 months and 12 months of treatment, the Harris score in the observation group was higher than that in the control group, while the Ficat pain index score in the observation group was lower than that in the control group. The differences between the two groups were statistically significant (P<0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was lower than that in the control group, and the difference with statistical significance (P<0.05). 【Conclusion】 DSA interventional fusion therapy for the treatment of early stage femoral head necrosis can significantly improve the function of hip function and relieve pain symptoms, which shows a good prognosis and worthy clinical application.
董强, 祁学强. DSA介入融通疗法治疗早期股骨头坏死的临床疗效[J]. 医学临床研究, 2020, 37(10): 1508-1510.
DONG Qiang, QI Xue-qiang. Efficacy and Prognosis of DSA Interventional Fusion Therapy in Patients with Early Stage Femoral Head Necrosis. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RESEARCH, 2020, 37(10): 1508-1510.
[1] Piuzzi NS, Chahla J, Schrock JB， et al. Evidence for the use of cell-based therapy for the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a systematic review of the literature[J]. J Arthroplasty,2017,32(5): 1698-1708. [2] 詹新宇,李博乐,张从福.中医综合疗法联合西医治疗非创伤性股骨头坏死临床疗效观察[J].中华中医药学刊,2015,33(2):498-500. [3] 肖勋刚,成明华,李康杰,等.两种方法治疗青壮年股骨颈骨折的疗效比较[J].医学临床研究,2006,23(12):1932-1934. [4] Gardeniers JWM. A new international classification of osteonecrosis of the ARCO committee on terminology and classification[J].ARCO News Letter,1992,4(1):41-46. [5] Harris WH. Hybrid total hip replacement: rationale and intermediate clinical results[J].Clin Orthop Relat Res,1996 (333):155-164. [6] Ficat RP, Arlect J. Nercrosis of femoral head in ischemia and nercrosis of bone[M].Bahimore:MD,Wiilliams & Wilkins Hungerford DS,1980:53-86. [7] 夏红,王万春,唐新桥,等.人工髋关节置换术后并发症临床分析[J].医学临床研究,2006,23(9):1436-1438. [8] 闫瑞强,穆永旭,李启民,等.股动脉介入灌注药物治疗早期股骨头坏死的疗效[J].中国老年学杂志,2014,34(22):6297-6299. [9] 薛晨曦,荆珏华,徐杰,等.选择性血管造影评价股骨颈骨折后股骨头血供变化[J].临床骨科杂志,2014,17(2):149-151. [10] Schmaranzer F, Arendt L, Lerch TD, et al. Femoral osteochondroplasty can be performed effectively without the risk of avascular necrosis or femoral neck fractures in an experimental ovine FAI model[J].Osteoarthritis Cartilage,2018,26(1):128-137. [11] 彭智.补气活血养股汤结合介入疗法治疗无菌性股骨头坏死症40例临床观察[J].中医杂志,2013,54(16):1390-1393. [12] Barquet A,Mayora A,Guimaraes JM, et al. Avascular necrosis of the femoral head following trochanteric fractures in adults: A systematic review [J].Injury,2014,45(12): 1848-1858.
2020, Vol. 37 
