经皮桥接钢板内固定与内置外固定支架治疗骨盆前环骨折的临床效果

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2024.09.013

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (1208 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要【目的】探讨经皮桥接钢板内固定与内置外固定支架治疗骨盆前环骨折的临床效果。【方法】选取2020年1月至2022年12月在本院接受手术治疗的72例骨盆前环骨折患者,按照随机数字表法分为内固定组(接受经皮桥接钢板内固定治疗)和外固定组(行内置外固定支架治疗),每组36例。比较两组手术相关指标、术后并发症发生率、骨折愈合时间、术后完全负重时间、骨折复位优良率、功能恢复状态及手术前后骨保护素(OPG)、骨钙素(BGP)水平。【结果】内固定组手术时间长于外固定组(P<0.05),术中出血量多于外固定组(P<0.05)。两组术中透视次数比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。内固定组骨折复位优良率高于外固定组(P<0.05),骨折愈合时间及术后完全负重时间均短于外固定组(P<0.05)。两组患者术后站、坐、工作、性功能、疼痛评分及总分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后,两组OPG、BGP水平高于术前(P<0.05),但两组OPG、BGP水平比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。外固定组术后并发症发生率高于内固定组(P<0.05)。【结论】经皮桥接钢板内固定与内置外固定支架治疗骨盆前环骨折,均可促进患者术后肢体功能的恢复,但内置外固定支架术的手术时间更短、出血量更少,而经皮桥接钢板内固定术后骨折复位效果更优、愈合时间更短。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	梁海群
	史志强
	吕新智

关键词 ：骨盆骨/损伤, 骨折/外科学, 骨折固定术,内, 治疗结果

Abstract：【Objective】To investigate the clinical effect of percutaneous bridging plate internal fixation and internal external fixation in the treatment of anterior pelvic ring fracture. 【Methods】A total of 72 patients with anterior pelvic ring fracture treated in our hospital from January 2020 to December 2022 were selected and divided into the internal fixation group (receiving percutaneous bridging plate internal fixation treatment) and the external fixation group (receiving internal external fixation stent treatment) according to random number table method, with 36 cases in each group. The operative indexes, postoperative complications, fracture healing time, excellent rate of fracture reduction, functional recovery status and the levels of osteopalcin (OPG) and osteocalcin (BGP) were compared between the two groups. 【Results】The operative time in the internal fixation group was longer than that in the external fixation group (P<0.05), and the amount of blood loss was higher than that in the external fixation group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the number of intraoperative fluoroscopy between the two groups (P>0.05). The rate of fracture reduction in the internal fixation group was higher than that in the external fixation group (P<0.05), and the time of fracture healing and postoperative full weight bearing were shorter than that in the external fixation group (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in standing, sitting, working, sexual function, pain score and total score between the two groups (P>0.05). After operation, the levels of OPG and BGP were higher than those before operation (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in external fixation group was higher than that in internal fixation group (P<0.05). 【Conclusion】Both percutaneous bridging plate internal fixation and internal external fixation scaffold can promote the recovery of limb function in patients with anterior pelvic ring fracture after surgery, but internal external fixation stenting has shorter operation time and less blood loss, while percutaneous bridging plate internal fixation has better fracture reduction effect and shorter healing time.

Key words： Pelvic Bones/IN Fractures/SU Fracture Fixation, Internal Treatment Outcome

收稿日期: 2024-05-11

中图分类号:

R683.3

引用本文:

梁海群, 史志强, 吕新智. 经皮桥接钢板内固定与内置外固定支架治疗骨盆前环骨折的临床效果[J]. 医学临床研究, 2024, 41(9): 1327-1330.
LIANG Haiqun, SHI Zhiqiang, LYU Xinzhi. Clinical Efficacy of Percutaneous Bridging Plate Internal Fixation versus Internal External Fixation for the Treatment of Anterior Pelvic Ring Fractures. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RESEARCH, 2024, 41(9): 1327-1330.

链接本文:

http://journal07.magtech.org.cn/yxlcyj/CN/10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2024.09.013 或 http://journal07.magtech.org.cn/yxlcyj/CN/Y2024/V41/I9/1327