FS-LASIK与SMILE治疗屈光不正后患者眼表变化分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2023.05.026

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (1130 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要【目的】探讨飞秒激光制瓣准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(FS-LASIK)与飞秒激光小切口基质透镜取出术(SMILE)治疗屈光不正后患者眼表变化情况。【方法】选取2021年1月至2022年1月在本院行FS-LASIK矫正的屈光不正患者38例作为FS-LASIK组,另外选取同期来本院行SMILE矫正的屈光不正患者38例作为SMILE组,比较两组术前、术后1周、术后 1 个月、术后 3 个月、术后6个月眼表疾病指数(OSDI)问卷评分、角膜荧光染色评分、中央泪河高度 (TMH)、睑板腺功能评分 (LMS )及脂质层厚度。【结果】术后6个月,FS-LASIK组OSDI评分高于SMILE组(P<0.05),术后1周、1个月、3个月OSDI评分较术前增加(P<0.05);两组术后1周、术后1个月角膜荧光素染色评分较术前均提高(P<0.05);两组术后1周、术后1个月TMH较术前提高(P<0.05);两组术前、术后1周、术后1个月、术后3个月、术后6个月LMS、脂质层厚度比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),两组术后6个月脂质层厚度较术前减少(P<0.05)。【结论】FS-LASIK与SMILE两种手术均会对屈光不正患者眼表产生影响,导致患者出现干眼症状,但FS-LASIK术后出现干眼症状更为严重。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	李红
	朱飞

关键词 ：屈光不正/外科学, 激光,准分子/治疗应用, 角膜磨镶术,激光原位, 眼表现

Abstract：【Objective】 To investigate the changes of ocular surface in patients with ametropia after femtosecond laser flap excimer laser laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and small incision stroma lens extraction (SMILE). 【Methods】A total of 38 patients with refractive errors who underwent FS-LASIK correction in our hospital from January 2021 to January 2022 were selected as the FS-LASIK group. In addition,38 patients with refractive errors who underwent SMILE correction in our hospital during the same period were selected as the SMILE group. The two groups were compared in terms of preoperative,postoperative 1 week,postoperative 1 month,postoperative 3 months,and postoperative 6 months,including the Eye Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire score,corneal fluorescence staining score,central lacrimal height (TMH),meibomian gland function score (LMS),and lipid layer thickness. 【Results】 Six months after surgery,the OSDI score of the FS-LASIK group was higher than that of the SMILE group (P<0.05),and the OSDI score increased at 1 week,1 month,and 3 months after surgery compared to those before surgery (P<0.05); The corneal fluorescein staining scores of both groups increased at 1 week and 1 month after surgery compared to before surgery (P<0.05); TMH in both groups increased at 1 week and 1 month after surgery compared to before surgery (P<0.05); There was no statistically significant difference in LMS and lipid layer thickness between the two groups before surgery,1 week after surgery,1 month after surgery,3 months after surgery,and 6 months after surgery (P>0.05). The lipid layer thickness of the two groups at 6 months after surgery decreased compared to that before surgery (P<0.05). 【Conclusion】 Both FS-LASIK and SMILE surgeries can have an impact on the ocular surface of ametropia patients,leading to dry eye symptoms. However,dry eye symptoms are more severe after FS-LASIK surgery.

Key words： Refractive Errors/SU Lasers,Excimer/TU Keratomileusis,Laser In Situ Eye Manifestations

收稿日期: 2022-07-18

中图分类号:

R779.6

通讯作者: *E-mail:759383432@qq.com

引用本文:

李红, 朱飞. FS-LASIK与SMILE治疗屈光不正后患者眼表变化分析[J]. 医学临床研究, 2023, 40(5): 731-734.
LI Hong, ZHU Fei. Analysis of Ocular Surface Changes in Patients with Refractive Error Treated with FS-LASIK and SMILE. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RESEARCH, 2023, 40(5): 731-734.

链接本文:

http://journal07.magtech.org.cn/yxlcyj/CN/10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2023.05.026 或 http://journal07.magtech.org.cn/yxlcyj/CN/Y2023/V40/I5/731

[1] 向剑波,郭燕,杨俊芳,等.208例儿童屈光不正性弱视的治疗效果及其影响因素分析[J].医学临床研究,2023,40(1):21-23.
[2] 邹广程,叶静娟.三种准分子激光角膜屈光手术治疗近视及散光的临床研究[J].医学临床研究,2019,36(11):2172-2175.
[3] YILDIZ TASCI Y,GÜRDAL C,SARAC O. Evaluation of the tear function tests and the ocular surface in first-time users of silicone hydrogel contact lenses[J].Curr Eye Res,2017,42(7):976-981.
[4] 李凤鸣,谢立信.中华眼科学(眼科全书)[M].3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2014:2197-2408.
[5] 苏远东,梁庆丰,王宁利,等. 泪膜客观散射指数对干眼诊断价值的研究[J].中华眼科杂志,2017,53(9):668-674.
[6] 高英,刘莹,符碧峰. 睑板腺功能障碍的研究进展[J].中国中医眼科杂志,2016,26(3):201-205.
[7] MUFTUOGLU O,AYDIN R,KILIC MUFTUOGLU I. Persistence of the cone on the posterior corneal surface affecting corneal aberration changes after intracorneal ring segment implantation in patients with keratoconus[J].Cornea,2018,37(3):347-353.
[8] QUEIRÓS A,LOPES-FERREIRA D,YEOH B,et al. Refractive,biometric and corneal topographic parameter changes during 12 months of orthokeratology[J].Clin Exp Optom,2020,103(4):454-462.
[9] 罗芳娴,孔祥斌,陆强. SMILE近视矫正术后前房结构参数的早期变化[J].临床眼科杂志,2021,29(4):326-329.
[10] 王佼佼,张楠,周红,等. SMILE术中不同激光能量设定对Ⅰ期不透明气泡层及视觉质量的影响[J].国际眼科杂志,2021,21(10):1782-1785.
[11] 王树林,庞辰久,王浩,等. FS-LASIK与SMILE矫治散光的矢量分析及临床效果比较[J].中华实验眼科杂志,2022,40(3):227-234.
[12] 张旭,王雁,徐路路. FS-LASIK与SMILE矫正近视术后角膜后表面高度的变化[J].眼科新进展,2020,40(5):435-438.
[13] 王嘉南,肖玥言,郗平,等. FS-LASIK与SMILE矫正近视术后角膜高阶像差的变化[J].眼科新进展,2019,39(6):540-543.
[14] 石容,廖一露,令狐绍容,等. SMILE与FS-LASIK矫正近视和近视散光术后24小时内疗效比较[J].遵义医学院学报,2019,42(3):311-315.
[15] 郭丰芳,方学军. FS-LASIK与SMILE术后干眼参数与角膜知觉的比较[J].中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志,2019,21(12):930-936.