医学临床研究
  2025年4月5日 星期六           首 页    |    期刊简介    |    编委会    |    投稿指南    |    期刊订阅    |    广告合作    |    留言板    |    联系我们    |    English
医学临床研究  2021, Vol. 38 Issue (11): 1680-1682    DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2021.11.022
  论著 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
经皮前方螺钉内固定及后外侧入路螺钉内固定治疗三踝骨折临床疗效比较
李有平1, 舒军峰2*
1.宝鸡市中医医院骨伤二科,陕西 宝鸡 724400;
2.宝鸡市扶风县人民医院骨科,陕西 扶风 722200
Clinical Comparative Study of Percutaneous Anterior Screw Internal Fixation and Posterolateral Approach Screw Internal Fixation in the Treatment of Three Ankle Fractures
LI You-ping, SHU Jun-feng
Baoji Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Baoji Shaanxi 724400
全文: PDF (1164 KB)   HTML (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 【目的】比较经皮前方螺钉内固定及后外侧入路螺钉内固定治疗三踝骨折的临床效果。【方法】回顾性分析2017年1月至2020年1月本院收治的92例三踝骨折患者的临床资料。依据治疗方法的不同分为经皮前方螺钉内固定治疗的A组(45例)和外侧入路螺钉内固定治疗的B组(47例)。对比两组患者手术时间、透视次数、术中出血量以及术后1年踝关节活动度(ROM)和影像学检查结果、完全负重时间、骨折愈合时间及不同时刻美国足踝外科协会(AOFAS)踝-后足功能评分。【结果】两组患者手术时间、完全负重时间、骨折愈合时间及AOFAS踝-后足功能评分、术后1年踝关节背屈、跖屈、内翻及外翻ROM比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。与术后3个月'比较,两组患者术后6个月及术后12个月AOFAS踝-后足功能评分均升高(P<0.05)。A组透视次数多于B组(P<0.05),术中出血量低于B组(P<0.05)。A组复位不良/固定不佳发生率高于B组(P<0.05)。术后1年,两组患者均无骨折复位丢失、内固定松动及踝关节间隙狭窄等现象。【结论】经皮前方螺钉内固定和后外侧入路螺钉内固定均可有效治疗三踝骨折,前者治疗透视次数多于后者、术中出血量低于后者 ,但内固定质量以后者为优。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
李有平
舒军峰
关键词 骨折/外科学踝损伤/外科学骨折固定术,内/方法    
Abstract:【Objective】To compare the clinical effects of percutaneous anterior screw internal fixation and posterolateral approach screw internal fixation in the treatment of three ankle fractures. 【Methods】 A retrospective analysis of the clinical data of 92 patients with three ankle fractures admitted to our hospital from January 2017 to January 2020. According to the different treatment methods. Patients were divided into group A (45 cases) treated with percutaneous anterior screw internal fixation and group B (47 cases) treated with posterolateral screw internal fixation. The operation time, number of fluoroscopy, intraoperative blood loss, 1year postoperative ankle range of motion (ROM), imaging examination results, full weight bearing time, fracture healing time, and ankle-hindfoot function score at different moments evaluated by the American Association of Foot and Ankle Surgery (AOFAS) were compared between the two groups.. 【Results】There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups of patients in operation time, time to complete weight bearing, fracture healing time, AOFAS ankle-hindfoot function score, ankle dorsiflexion, plantar flexion, varus and valgus ROM at 1 year after surgery (P>0.05). Compared to the AOFAS score at 3 months after operation, the AOFAS ankle-hindfoot function scores increased in both groups at 6 months and 12 months after operation (P<0.05). The number of fluoroscopy in group A was more than that in group B (P<0.05), and the amount of intraoperative blood loss was lower than that in group B (P<0.05). The incidence of poor reduction/poor fixation in group A was higher than that in group B (P<0.05). One year after the operation, there was no loss of fracture reduction, loose internal fixation and narrow ankle joint space in both groups. 【Conclusion】Both percutaneous anterior screw internal fixation and posterolateral approach screw internal fixation can effectively treat three ankle fractures. The former has more fluoroscopy treatments than the latter and the intraoperative blood loss is lower than the latter, but the quality of internal fixation is superior to the latter.
Key wordsFRACTURES/SU    Ankle Injuries/SU    Fracture Fixation, Internal/MT
收稿日期: 2021-09-07     
中图分类号:  R684.7  
通讯作者: *E-mail:1014016471@qq.com   
引用本文:   
李有平, 舒军峰. 经皮前方螺钉内固定及后外侧入路螺钉内固定治疗三踝骨折临床疗效比较[J]. 医学临床研究, 2021, 38(11): 1680-1682.
LI You-ping, SHU Jun-feng. Clinical Comparative Study of Percutaneous Anterior Screw Internal Fixation and Posterolateral Approach Screw Internal Fixation in the Treatment of Three Ankle Fractures. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 38(11): 1680-1682.
链接本文:  
http://journal07.magtech.org.cn/yxlcyj/CN/10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2021.11.022     或     http://journal07.magtech.org.cn/yxlcyj/CN/Y2021/V38/I11/1680
版权所有 © 2013 医学临床研究杂志社  湘ICP备13012052号-1
办公地址:湖南省长沙市芙蓉区新军路43号煤炭大院主办公楼6楼621、623、632、636室 邮编:410011 电话(传真):0731-84824007 E-mail:jcr_cs.hn@vip.163.com
技术支持:北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn