经皮微创接骨板、外固定支架、专家级髓内钉固定治疗43-A型胫骨骨折的临床疗效比较

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2021.09.008

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (1136 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要【目的】对比分析经皮微创接骨板(MIPPO)、外固定支架、专家级髓内钉固定方法(ETN)治疗AO分型43-A型胫骨骨折的临床疗效及适应证。【方法】选取2017年4月至2019年10月于本院就诊接受手术治疗的胫骨骨折128例患者为研究对象,根据治疗方式的不同分为三组:经皮微创接骨板(A组, 42例),外固定支架(B组 ,43例),专家级髓内钉固定(C组 ,43例)。对比三组患者手术时间、术中出血量、骨折愈合时间及住院时间等指标和患者术后1、3、6个月X线复查的骨折愈合情况。比较三组患者美国足踝外科协会(AOFAS)足-踝功能评分(AOFAS评分)及其评分功能优良率和术后并发症的发生率。【结果】B组患者术中出血量、骨折愈合时间高于A组、C组(P<0.05),手术时间显著低于A组、C组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);三组患者足-踝功能优良率及AOFAS评分比较,B组显著低于A组、C组(P<0.05);三组患者并发症总发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。【结论】三种手术方法对于AO分型43-A型胫骨骨折患者均有一定治疗效果,临床首选内固定术治疗,对于不适合内固定治疗的患者,可采用远端交叉置钉避免跨踝关节的外固定法进行治疗。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	鱼红进
	阴鑫哲

关键词 ：胫骨骨折/外科学, 骨折固定术,内/方法, 骨板, 最小侵入性外科手术, 治疗结果

Abstract：【Objective】To compare and analyze the clinical effects and indications of 43-A tibial fracture (AO type) treatment by MIPPO (minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis), external fixation and ETN (expert intramedullary nail). 【Methods】From April 2017 to October 2019, 128 patients with tibial fracture who were treated by operation in our hospital were selected as the research objects. According to the different treatment methods, they were divided into three groups: percutaneous minimally invasive plate (42 cases in group A), external fixation frame (43 cases in group B) and expert intramedullary nail fixation (43 cases in group C). The operation time, intraoperative hemorrhage, fracture healing time and hospitalization time were compared among the three groups. X-ray examination was performed at 1, 3 and 6 months after operation. The AOFAS score, the rate of excellent scoring function and the incidence of postoperative complications were compared among the three groups. 【Results】The bleeding volume and fracture healing time in group B were higher than those in group A and group C (P<0.05), and the operation time in group B was significantly lower than that in group A and group C (P<0.05); The excellent rate of scoring ankle function and AOFAS score in group B were significantly lower than those in group A and C (P<0.05); there was no statistical significance in the total incidence of complications among the three groups (P>0.05). 【Conclusion】Three kinds of surgical methods have certain therapeutic effect on the patients with AO 43-A tibial fracture. The first choice is internal fixation. For the patients who are not suitable for internal fixation, the distal cross nail is used to avoid external fixation across the ankle joint.

Key words： Tibial Fractures /SU Fracture Fixation, Internal/MT Bone Plates Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures Treatment Outcome

收稿日期: 2021-05-24

中图分类号:

R683

通讯作者: *E-mail:823306281@qq.com

引用本文:

鱼红进, 阴鑫哲. 经皮微创接骨板、外固定支架、专家级髓内钉固定治疗43-A型胫骨骨折的临床疗效比较[J]. 医学临床研究, 2021, 38(9): 1307-1310.
YU Hong-jin, YIN Xin-zhe. To Compare and Analyze the Clinical Effects and Indications of 43-A Tibial Fracture (AO Type) Treatment by Different Methods: Percutaneous Minimally Invasive Osteosynthesis, External Fixation and Expert Intramedullary Nail. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 38(9): 1307-1310.

链接本文:

http://journal07.magtech.org.cn/yxlcyj/CN/10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2021.09.008 或 http://journal07.magtech.org.cn/yxlcyj/CN/Y2021/V38/I9/1307

[1] 陈安富, 唐旭东, 黄凯. 髓内钉与钢板内固定治疗成人胫骨干远端骨折的疗效比较[J].中华创伤骨科杂志, 2019, 21(8):706-709.
[2] 王欣. 临时外固定支架转换内固定分期治疗胫骨干开放性骨折[J].中华创伤骨科杂志, 2018, 20(8):661-665.
[3] 刘涛. 双反牵引一期微创治疗同侧股骨骨折合并胫骨平台骨折[J].中华创伤骨科杂志, 2017, 19(10):840-845.
[4] 舒衡生, 石博文, 沈义东,等. 外固定辅助内固定矫正膝关节周围畸形[J].中华骨科杂志, 2019, 39(1):10-16.
[5] 马洪冬, 鲁志超, 殷大利, 等. 保守与全螺纹空心螺钉治疗第五跖骨Ekrol 2型骨折的疗效比较[J].中华骨科杂志, 2018, 38(21):1307-1313.
[6] WANI I H, GANI N U, YASEEN M, et al. Operative management of distal tibial extra-articular fractures-intramedullary nail versus minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis[J].Randomized Controlled Trial,2017, 19(6):537-541.
[7] 哈力?哈布力汗, 杨毅, 努尔哈那提?沙依兰别克,等. 髓内钉与钢板治疗成人胫骨远端骨折的Meta分析[J].中华创伤骨科杂志, 2018, 20(2):112-117.
[8] 王远政, 陈龙, 佘荣峰,等. 髌上入路与髌下入路髓内固定治疗胫骨骨折疗效的Meta分析[J].中华创伤杂志, 2019, 35(8):742-749.
[9] 林斌, 陈志达, 吴进, 等. 自行研制的胫骨可调负重支具在AO分型42-B型胫骨干骨折髓内钉固定术后的应用[J].中华创伤骨科杂志, 2017, 19(1):47-53.
[10] 乔锋, 李涤尘, 靳忠民,等. 3D打印外固定架治疗胫骨骨折的临床应用[J].中华骨科杂志, 2019, 39(1):23-29.
[11] CEMIL E, ALTAY M A, ALTAY N, et al. The effect of 2 different surgical methods on intracompartmental pressure value in tibial shaft fracture: An experimental study in a rabbit model[J].Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg,2017, 23(2):85-90.
[12] 焦勤, 董良超, 王林, 等. 空心螺钉内固定治疗青少年胫骨远端骨骺骨折的疗效观察[J].中华实用儿科临床杂志, 2016, 31(23):1809-1812.
[13] 柴明祥, 赵斌, 张文武,等. 三种固定方法治疗AO分型43-A型胫骨骨折的疗效比较[J].中华创伤骨科杂志, 2016,21(7):579-585.
[14] 董文伟, 毛海蛟, 姚立炜, 等. 胫骨牵引架在股骨远端骨折经皮微创钢板内固定中的应用[J].中华骨科杂志, 2018, 38(22):1357-1365.
[15] 梁海涛, 朱恒杰, 李成存,等. MIPPO,ETN和外固定支架固定方法治疗AO分型43-A型胫骨骨折的临床疗效[J].骨科临床与研究杂志, 2017,4(4):56-60.