Abstract:【Objective】To investigate the effects of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and optimal drug therapy (ODT) on long-term quality of life and prognosis in elderly patients with coronary heart disease. 【Methods】The clinical data of 178 elderly patients with coronary heart disease admitted to our hospital from June 2018 to June 2023 were retrospectively analyzed, and the patients were divided into percutaneous coronary intervention group (PCI group, n=88) and optimized drug therapy group (ODT group, n=90) according to different treatment methods. The two groups were compared in terms of the cardiac function indexes of [left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), stroke output (SV)], index of exercise ability [6 min walking test (6MWT)], pulmonary function index [forced expiratory volume (FEV1), maximum vital capacity (VCmax), forced vital capacity (FVC)], serum biochemical markers [Troponin I(cTnI), N-terminal brain natriuretic peptide precursor (NT-proBNP), creatine kinase isozyme-MB (CK-MB)] and quality of life scores [Coronary heart disease Quality of Life Scale (MacNew HRQL) score]. Multivariate Cox regression model was used to analyze the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in the two groups. 【Results】After treatment, LVEF and SV in both groups were higher than before treatment, LVEF and SV in PCI group were higher than ODT group, LVEDD in both groups was lower than before treatment, the PCI group was lower than the ODT group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). After treatment, 6MWT, FEV1, VCmax and FVC in both groups were higher than before treatment, and the PCI group was higher than the ODT group, with statistical significance (P<0.05). After treatment, serum levels of cTnI, NT-proBNP and CK-MB were low in both groups. Before treatment, the PCI group was lower than the ODT group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). After treatment, MacNew HRQL scores in both groups were higher than before treatment, and the PCI group was higher than the ODT group, with statistical significance (P<0.05). The cumulative incidence of MACE in PCI group was significantly lower than that in ODT group (P<0.05). 【Conclusion】PCI can improve cardiac function and exercise ability in patients with coronary heart disease, and has significant advantages in improving quality of life and reducing long-term cardiovascular risk.
周晓萍. PCI与优化药物治疗对老年冠心病患者长期生活质量及预后的影响[J]. 医学临床研究, 2025, 42(3): 394-397.
ZHOU Xiaoping. Effect of PCI and Optimized Drug Therapy on Long-Term Quality of Life and Prognosis in Elderly Patients with Coronary Heart Disease. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RESEARCH, 2025, 42(3): 394-397.
[1] 王洁,肖珉,李玉峰,等. 血脂和凝血指标与冠心病患者冠状动脉狭窄程度的相关性[J].中国医药,2023,18(1):11-15. [2] 徐迪,田金萍,刘赟玥,等. 冠心病合并2型糖尿病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗围术期血糖波动的特点及影响因素研究[J].中国全科医学,2023,26(15):1863-1872. [3] 盖兢泾,韩智奇,金琴花,等. 冠状动脉旁路手术、优化药物治疗和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的全因死亡率的对比[J].中华保健医学杂志,2021,23(1):80-83. [4] 颜红兵,马长生,霍勇.临床冠心病诊断与治疗指南[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2010: 5-27. [5] LIU W, JI Y, ZHANG W, et al. Correlation analysis of CML, sRAGE, and esRAGE and the measure of atherosclerosis of coronary heart disease[J].Comput Intell Neurosci,2023, 2023:9836580. [6] DUQUE E R, BRIASOULIS A, ALVAREZ P A. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in the elderly: pathophysiology, diagnostic and therapeutic approach[J].J Geriatr Cardiol,2019, 16(5): 421. [7] DAMLUJI A A, CHUNG S E, XUE Q L, et al. Physical frailty phenotype and the development of geriatric syndromes in older adults with coronary heart disease[J].Am J Med,2021, 134(5): 662-671. [8] NAKAMURA T, HORIKOSHI T, KOBAYAHI T, et al. Optimal medical therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention in very elderly patients with coronary artery disease[J].Int J Cardiol Cardiovasc Risk Prev,2023, 16: 200162. [9] HAO J Y, ZHANG J, JING R, et al. Clinical prognosis of optimal medical therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with coronary heart disease[J].Chin Med J(Engl),2021, 134(16): 2003-2005. [10] QIAN X D, DENG H Z, YUAN J M, et al. Evaluating the efficacy and safety of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus the optimal drug therapy (ODT) for stable coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].J Thorac Dis,2022, 14(4): 1183. [11] 赵帅,王伟,汪钦,等. PCI治疗对CTO合并LVEF降低的冠心病患者术后短期生活质量的影响[J].中国动脉硬化杂志,2019,27(7):593-598. [12] 余慧琳. 心脏康复运动对冠心病合并糖尿病患者PCI术后心肺功能、运动功能和生活质量的影响[J].心血管康复医学杂志,2023,32(5):456-459. [13] 任丽娜,王东,闫晓武. CK-MB、cTnT、H-FABP、MYO在急性心肌梗死患者中的检测意义[J].贵州医药, 2021, 45(12): 1907-1908.