医学临床研究
  2025年4月6日 星期日           首 页    |    期刊简介    |    编委会    |    投稿指南    |    期刊订阅    |    广告合作    |    留言板    |    联系我们    |    English
医学临床研究  2024, Vol. 41 Issue (11): 1689-1691    DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2024.11.017
  论著 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
右美托咪定与哌替啶在肝癌射频消融术患者中的麻醉效果比较
杨煜, 刘岷, 朱芩芩
上海市黄浦区中西医结合医院麻醉科,上海 200436
Comparison of Anesthetic Effects of Dexmedetomidine and Pethidine in Patients Undergoing Radiofrequency Ablation for Liver Cancer
YANG Yu, LIU Min, ZHU Qinqin
Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Huangpu District Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital, Shanghai 200436
全文: PDF (1208 KB)   HTML (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 【目的】比较右美托咪定(Dex)与哌替啶在肝癌肿瘤射频消融术患者中的麻醉效果。【方法】98例择期行肿瘤射频消融术的肝癌患者,按照麻醉方法不同分为观察组(使用Dex麻醉,n=50)和对照组(使用哌替啶麻醉,n=48)。比较两组患者入室平卧10 min(T0)、手术开始10 min(T1)、术毕(T2)和术后24 h(T3)的Ramsay镇静评分、心率(HR)、平均动脉压(MAP)、脑氧饱和度(rSO2)水平以及手术期间不良反应发生情况。【结果】T1、T2时,两组患者的Ramsay镇静评分均高于T0时(P<0.05),且观察组T1、T2时Ramsay镇静评分均高于对照组(P<0.05);T1时,两组患者HR、MAP均低于T0时,两组患者T2时rSO2均高于T0时(P<0.05),对照组T2时HR、MAP均低于T0时,T1时rSO2高于T0时(P<0.05),观察组T2时HR、MAP均高于对照组(P<0.05),rSO2低于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组不良反应总发生率低于对照组(P<0.05)。【结论】相比哌替啶,Dex用于肝癌肿瘤射频消融术患者中的麻醉效果更好,且对rSO2影响更小,能够降低患者不良反应发生率。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
杨煜
刘岷
朱芩芩
关键词 肝肿瘤导管消融术右美托咪定/治疗应用哌替啶/治疗应用麻醉    
Abstract:【Objective】To compare the anesthetic effects of dexmedetomidine (Dex) and pethidine on patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation for liver cancer and their impact on regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO2).【Methods】A total of 98 patients scheduled for radiofrequency ablation for liver cancer were divided into two groups based on the anesthetic methods: the observation group (Dex, n=50) and the control group (pethidine, n=48). The Ramsay sedation score, heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), rSO2 levels, and incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups at baseline (T0), 10 minutes before the start of the procedure (T1), at the end of the procedure (T2), and 24 hours postoperatively (T3).【Results】At T1 and T2, the Ramsay sedation scores of both groups were higher than that at T0 (P<0.05), and the observation group had higher Ramsay sedation scores than the control group at T1 and T2 (P<0.05). At T1, both groups had lower HR and MAP compared to T0, and at T2, both groups had higher rSO2 levels compared to T0 (P<0.05). The control group had lower HR and MAP at T2 compared to T0, and higher rSO2 at T1 compared to T0 (P<0.05). At T2, the HR and MAP of the observation group were higher than those of the control group (P<0.05), while rSO2 was lower (P<0.05). The overall incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05).【Conclusion】Compared to pethidine, Dex provides better anesthetic effects for patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation for liver cancer, has a smaller impact on rSO2, and reduces the incidence of adverse reactions.
Key wordsLiver Neoplasms    Catheter Ablation    Dexmedetomidine/TU    Meperidine/TU    Anesthesia
收稿日期: 2024-05-20     
中图分类号:  R735.7  
引用本文:   
杨煜, 刘岷, 朱芩芩. 右美托咪定与哌替啶在肝癌射频消融术患者中的麻醉效果比较[J]. 医学临床研究, 2024, 41(11): 1689-1691.
YANG Yu, LIU Min, ZHU Qinqin. Comparison of Anesthetic Effects of Dexmedetomidine and Pethidine in Patients Undergoing Radiofrequency Ablation for Liver Cancer. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RESEARCH, 2024, 41(11): 1689-1691.
链接本文:  
http://journal07.magtech.org.cn/yxlcyj/CN/10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2024.11.017     或     http://journal07.magtech.org.cn/yxlcyj/CN/Y2024/V41/I11/1689
版权所有 © 2013 医学临床研究杂志社  湘ICP备13012052号-1
办公地址:湖南省长沙市芙蓉区新军路43号煤炭大院主办公楼6楼621、623、632、636室 邮编:410011 电话(传真):0731-84824007 E-mail:jcr_cs.hn@vip.163.com
技术支持:北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn