医学临床研究
  2025年4月7日 星期一           首 页    |    期刊简介    |    编委会    |    投稿指南    |    期刊订阅    |    广告合作    |    留言板    |    联系我们    |    English
医学临床研究  2021, Vol. 38 Issue (2): 227-229    DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2021.02.019
  论著 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
单孔胸腔镜与单操作孔胸腔镜治疗自发性气胸疗效对比研究
于志奇, 孟永胜, 邵壮, 宋小勇, 周君君, 李鲁
战略支援部队特色医学中心胸外科,北京 100101
A Comparative Study on the Efficacy of Single Port VAST and single Utility Port VATS in the Treatment of Spontaneous Pneumothorax
YU Zhi-qi, MENG Yong-sheng, SHAO Zhuang, et al
PLA Strategic Support Force Characteristic Medical Center, Beijing 100101
全文: PDF (1161 KB)   HTML (0 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 【目的】 比较单孔胸腔镜与单操作孔胸腔镜下行肺大疱切除加胸膜固定术的临床治疗效果。【方法】 回顾性分析2016年1月至2019年12月本院收治的84例自发性气胸患者,根据手术方法的不同将其分为观察组(单孔胸腔镜手术治疗,n=43)和对照组(单操作孔胸腔镜手术治疗,n=41)。记录并比较两组患者切口长度、出血量、手术时间、术后带管时间、止痛方式所占比例、术后住院时间及术后并发症发生情况。【结果】 观察组切口长度、出血量显著少于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组手术时间短于对照组,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者止痛方式、术后带管时间、术后住院时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者各有1例肺不张伴胸腔积液,予局麻下行胸腔闭式引流,抗感染并嘱患者加强呼吸锻炼后均顺利恢复,两组患者术后并发症发生情况比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。【结论】 在不延长手术及住院时间且不增加手术并发症的前提下,单孔胸腔镜更符合患者对微创和美观的需求,用于治疗自发性气胸安全可靠,值得临床推广应用。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
关键词 气胸/外科学胸腔镜检查/方法预后治疗结果    
Abstract【Objective】 To compare the clinical effect of single port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (SPVATS) and single utility port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in the treatment of pulmonary bullectomy with pleurodesis. 【Methods】 A retrospective analysis of 84 cases of spontaneous pneumothorax patients in our hospital from January 2016 to December 2019, according to the different surgical methods, they were divided into observation group (single port thoracoscopic surgery, n=43) and control group (single utility port thoracoscopic surgery, n=41). The length of incision, blood loss, operation time, postoperative catheter time, the proportion of analgesic methods, postoperative hospital stay and postoperative complications were recorded and compared between the two groups.【Results】 The incision length and bleeding volume of the observation group were significantly less than those of the control group (P<0.05); the operation time of the observation group was shorter than that of the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in pain relief, postoperative catheter time and postoperative hospital stay (P>0.05). One case of atelectasis accompanied with pleural effusion occurred in two groups respectively. The patients were given closed thoracic drainage under local anesthesia, anti infection and asked to strengthen respiratory exercise, and all recovered smoothly. There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups (P>0.05).【Conclusion】 On the premise of no longer operation and hospitalization time and no increase of surgical complications, single port thoracoscopy is more in line with the needs of patients for minimally invasive and beautiful. It is safe and reliable for the treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax, which is worthy of clinical application.
Key wordsPneumothorax/SU    Thoracoscopy/MT    Prognosis    Treatment Outcome
收稿日期: 2020-02-21     
中图分类号:  R561.4  
通讯作者: *E-mail:luli86010@163.com   
引用本文:   
于志奇, 孟永胜, 邵壮, 宋小勇, 周君君, 李鲁. 单孔胸腔镜与单操作孔胸腔镜治疗自发性气胸疗效对比研究[J]. 医学临床研究, 2021, 38(2): 227-229.
YU Zhi-qi, MENG Yong-sheng, SHAO Zhuang, et al. A Comparative Study on the Efficacy of Single Port VAST and single Utility Port VATS in the Treatment of Spontaneous Pneumothorax. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 38(2): 227-229.
链接本文:  
http://journal07.magtech.org.cn/yxlcyj/CN/10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2021.02.019     或     http://journal07.magtech.org.cn/yxlcyj/CN/Y2021/V38/I2/227
版权所有 © 2013 医学临床研究杂志社  湘ICP备13012052号-1
办公地址:湖南省长沙市芙蓉区新军路43号煤炭大院主办公楼6楼621、623、632、636室 邮编:410011 电话(传真):0731-84824007 E-mail:jcr_cs.hn@vip.163.com
技术支持:北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn