|
|
|
| Analysis of the Effect of Single Hole Thoracoscopic Drainage Combined with Negative Pressure Drainage in the Treatment of Lung Cancer |
| WANG Zhen-hua, ZHANG Li-guo, GUO Xi-xi |
| Xinxiang Central Hospital,Xinxiang 453002 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract 【Objective】To investigate the drainage effect of single thoracic drainage tube combined with negative pressure drainage tube after single port thoracoscopic lung cancer radical operation. 【Methods】A total of 80 patients with non-small cell lung cancer who underwent SP-VATS radical resection from July 2015 to October 2019 were selected and randomly divided into observation group (single drainage combined with negative pressure drainage tube) and control group (conventional single drainage tube), 40 cases in each group. The postoperative drainage volume, hospital stay, catheter time and infection were recorded and compared between the two groups. The levels of serum C-reactive protein (CRP), tumor necrosis factor -α(TNF-α) and interleukin-8 (IL-8) were compared between the two groups.【Results】The postoperative drainage volume, hospital stay and tube time of the observation group were lower than those of the control group, and the postoperative wound infection rate of the observation group was lower than that of the control group, the differences were statistically significant ( P <0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications and the use rate of opioid analgesics in the observation group were lower than those in the control group ( P <0.05).The levels of serum CRP, TNF-α and IL-8 in the two groups 5d after operation were lower than those in the control group on postoperative 1day ( P <0.05).【Conclusion】The drainage effect of single thoracic drainage tube combined with negative pressure drainage after SP-VATS lung cancer radical operation is more significant than that of conventional use of thoracic drainage tube, which is conducive to reducing the inflammatory reaction, shortening the length of hospital stay, and has great significance for the prognosis of patients.
|
|
Received: 20 October 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 胡志亮, 姜波, 李震. 单操作孔胸腔镜下支气管袖式切除肺癌根治术5例报告[J].中国微创外科杂志, 2016, 16(5):414-417.
[2] 陈巍, 李文涛, 杨泽山. 单操作孔胸腔镜手术在肺部结节病变患者中的应用价值探讨[J].浙江医学, 2016, 38(15):1277-1279.
[3] 林剑锋, 郑炜, 朱勇. 单孔与三孔胸腔镜肺癌根治术后C反应蛋白和降钙素原水平的比较[J].福建医科大学学报, 2016, 50(2):112-115.
[4] 郭卫东. 负压胸腔引流与胸腔闭式引流治疗胸部外伤患者血气胸的效果比较[J].山东医药, 2016, 56(37):82-84.
[5] 李星, 张璐, 仲宁,等. 单胸腔引流管在肺癌上叶切除术后的应用[J].临床肺科杂志, 2016, 21(12):2172-2173.
[6] 杨帆, 孙战文. 胸腔引流管拔管后切口愈合不良的原因分析[J].医学临床研究, 2017, 34(12):2455-2456.
[7] 姚宇锋, 孙红玲, 许彩云. 负压封闭引流技术在胸骨术后切口脂肪液化中的应用[J].中华急诊医学杂志, 2018, 27(9):1060.
[8] 张德明, 赵金平. 两种胸腔引流方式在肺叶切除术后患者中应用的病例对照研究[J].中国胸心血管外科临床杂志, 2016,22(2):345-346.
[9] 焦鹏, 李简, 佟宏峰. 近距离两孔与单孔胸腔镜下肺癌手术的对比[J].实用医学杂志, 2016, 32(10):1627-1630. |
|
|
|
2021, Vol. 38 
