医学临床研究
   Jul. 14, 2025    Home  |  About Journal  |  Editorial Board  |  Instruction  |  Subscribe  |  Advertisement  |  Messages Board  |  Contact Us  |  中文
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RESEARCH  2021, Vol. 38 Issue (2): 262-265    DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2021.02.030
Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Effect of Ultrasound-guided Adductor Tube Block and Femoral Nerve Block for Postoperative Analgesia of Tibial Fractures
CHEN Ya-li, WU Wei, WANG Xing-hua, et al
Department of Anesthesiology, Baoji High-tech People's Hospital, Shaanxi Baoji, 721000
Download: PDF (1178 KB)   HTML (0 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  【Objective】 To investigate the effect of ultrasound-guided adductor block and femoral nerve block for postoperative analgesia of tibial fracture. 【Methods】 A total of 80 patients with tibial fracture in our hospital were selected and divided into observation group (n=47) and control group (n=33) according to different analgesic schemes. The control group was given ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block analgesia, and the observation group was given ultrasound-guided adductor canal block. The analgesic and sedative effect, quadriceps muscle strength and adverse reaction rate of the two groups were compared.【Results】 At 12 h, 24 h and 48 h after operation, the VAS scores of the two groups when bending the knee and at rest were lower than those at 8 h and 4 h after operation (P<0.05).There was no significant difference in VAS score between the two groups at the same time when bending the knee and at rest (P>0.05). Ramsay scores at 8 h, 12 h and 24 h after operation in the two groups were lower than those at 4 h after operation (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in Ramsay scores between the two groups at the same time (P>0.05).The muscle strength of quadriceps femoris in the control group: preoperative > 24 h after operation > 48 h after operation (P<0.05), there was no significant change in the observation group (P>0.05); the muscle strength of the observation group 24 h and 48 h after operation were greater than those of the control group (P<0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was 19.15% (9/47), which was significantly lower than 42.42% (14/33) in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (χ 2=5.127,P<0.05).【Conclusion】 Ultrasound guided adductor block has the same analgesic and sedative effects as femoral nerve block, but adductor block is more rapid in analgesia, has less effect on quadriceps muscle strength, and is more conducive to early postoperative rehabilitation treatment with higher safety.
Key wordsTibial Fractures /SU      Ultrasonography      Femoral Nerve      Nerve Block      Analgesia     
Received: 18 November 2020     
:  R683.423  
Service
E-mail this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
CHEN Ya-li
WU Wei
WANG Xing-hua
et al
Cite this article:   
CHEN Ya-li,WU Wei,WANG Xing-hua, et al. Effect of Ultrasound-guided Adductor Tube Block and Femoral Nerve Block for Postoperative Analgesia of Tibial Fractures[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 38(2): 262-265.
URL:  
http://journal07.magtech.org.cn/yxlcyj/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2021.02.030     OR     http://journal07.magtech.org.cn/yxlcyj/EN/Y2021/V38/I2/262
Copyright © Editorial Board of JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RESEARCH
Supported by:Beijing Magtech