|
|
|
| Effect of Ultrasound-guided Adductor Tube Block and Femoral Nerve Block for Postoperative Analgesia of Tibial Fractures |
| CHEN Ya-li, WU Wei, WANG Xing-hua, et al |
| Department of Anesthesiology, Baoji High-tech People's Hospital, Shaanxi Baoji, 721000 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract 【Objective】 To investigate the effect of ultrasound-guided adductor block and femoral nerve block for postoperative analgesia of tibial fracture. 【Methods】 A total of 80 patients with tibial fracture in our hospital were selected and divided into observation group (n=47) and control group (n=33) according to different analgesic schemes. The control group was given ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block analgesia, and the observation group was given ultrasound-guided adductor canal block. The analgesic and sedative effect, quadriceps muscle strength and adverse reaction rate of the two groups were compared.【Results】 At 12 h, 24 h and 48 h after operation, the VAS scores of the two groups when bending the knee and at rest were lower than those at 8 h and 4 h after operation (P<0.05).There was no significant difference in VAS score between the two groups at the same time when bending the knee and at rest (P>0.05). Ramsay scores at 8 h, 12 h and 24 h after operation in the two groups were lower than those at 4 h after operation (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in Ramsay scores between the two groups at the same time (P>0.05).The muscle strength of quadriceps femoris in the control group: preoperative > 24 h after operation > 48 h after operation (P<0.05), there was no significant change in the observation group (P>0.05); the muscle strength of the observation group 24 h and 48 h after operation were greater than those of the control group (P<0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was 19.15% (9/47), which was significantly lower than 42.42% (14/33) in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (χ 2=5.127,P<0.05).【Conclusion】 Ultrasound guided adductor block has the same analgesic and sedative effects as femoral nerve block, but adductor block is more rapid in analgesia, has less effect on quadriceps muscle strength, and is more conducive to early postoperative rehabilitation treatment with higher safety.
|
|
Received: 18 November 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 孙可, 金梅, 袁亮婧, 等. 超声引导收肌管阻滞用于患儿膝关节术后镇痛的效果[J].中华麻醉学杂志, 2016, 36(6):685-688.
[2] 王福朝, 孙学飞, 张同军, 等. 老年膝关节置换术后超声引导下的两种神经阻滞镇痛效果比较[J].中国现代医学杂志, 2018, 28(18):109-113.
[3] 张云慧, 顾新宇, 刘清仁,等. 超声引导神经阻滞复合全身麻醉在胫骨骨折手术中的应用[J].临床麻醉学杂志, 2015, 31(3):228-230.
[4] 辛曾峰, 李杭. 胫骨平台骨折术后不同期感染的治疗[J].中华创伤杂志, 2019, 35(2):136-142.
[5] 孔宪刚, 李海鸥, 宋成军, 等. 超声引导下收肌管阻滞在全膝关节置换术后多模式联合镇痛中的作用[J].山东医药, 2017, 60(21):64-67.
[6] 石钊, 张素品, 王国林, 等. 收肌管阻滞联合闭孔神经后支阻滞用于全膝关节置换术老年病人术后镇痛的效果[J].中华麻醉学杂志, 2017, 37(11):1365-1367.
[7] 余桂芳, 蒋超. 多模式镇痛下持续髂筋膜间隙阻滞与收肌管阻滞对老年人全膝关节置换术后镇痛及早期康复的影响[J].医用生物力学, 2019, 34(1):101-105.
[8] 杨光辉, 杨太明, 朱裕成, 等. 胫骨平台后髁骨折的手术治疗[J].中国矫形外科杂志, 2015, 23(14):1272-1275.
[9] 赵旻暐, 田华, 王宁, 等. 膝关节置换术后超声引导收肌管阻滞的镇痛疗效观察[J].中华医学杂志, 2016, 96(35):2813-2817.
[10] 丁煌, 周妙苗, 崔珊珊,等. 收肌管阻滞联合浸润麻醉用于全膝关节置换患者术后镇痛的效果[J].中华麻醉学杂志, 2016, 36(9):1102-1105. |
|
|
|
2021, Vol. 38 
