医学临床研究
  2025年4月6日 星期日           首 页    |    期刊简介    |    编委会    |    投稿指南    |    期刊订阅    |    广告合作    |    留言板    |    联系我们    |    English
医学临床研究  2024, Vol. 41 Issue (1): 95-98    DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2024.01.026
  论著 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
维得利珠单抗联合美沙拉嗪治疗炎症性肠病的临床疗效及安全性分析
马真真1, 朱冰洋1, 方金涛2*
1.南阳医学高等专科学校第一附属医院,河南 南阳 473000;
2.南阳职业学院,河南 南阳 473000
Clinical Efficacy and Safety Analysis of the Combination of Vedolizumab and Mesalazine in the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease
MA Zhenzhen, ZHU Bingyang, FANG Jintao
The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanyang Medical College,Nanyang Henan 473000
全文: PDF (1182 KB)   HTML (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 【目的】 探讨维得利珠单抗联合美沙拉嗪治疗炎症性肠病的临床疗效及安全性。【方法】 选取2021年1月至2022年12月南阳医学高等专科学校第一附属医院收治的84例炎症性肠病患者,采用随机数字表法将其分为常规组和联合组,每组42例。常规组给予美沙拉嗪,联合组在常规组的基础上给予维得利珠单抗,两组均在第8周观察治疗效果。比较两组临床疗效、外周血炎症因子[血清白细胞介素-4(IL-4)、白细胞介素-17(IL-17)]、炎症性肠病生活质量问卷(IBDQ)评分情况,记录治疗期间药物不良反应发生情况。【结果】 联合组总有效率为95.24%(40/42),高于常规组的78.57%(33/42),差异有统计学意义(χ2=5.126,P<0.05)。治疗后,两组患者血清IL-4、IL-17水平均低于治疗前,且联合组低于常规组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。常规组、联合组治疗前IBDQ评分分别为(115.89±12.93)分、(113.27±11.85)分,两组治疗后分别为(182.34±15.48)分、(198.15±7.26)分。治疗后,两组患者IBDQ评分高于治疗前,且联合组高于常规组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组不良反应发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.156,P=0.693)。【结论】 维得利珠单抗联合美沙拉嗪治疗炎症性肠病可提高治疗效果,抑制炎症因子合成,改善患者生活质量,安全性良好。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
马真真
朱冰洋
方金涛
关键词 炎性肠疾病/药物疗法抗体,单克隆/治疗应用氨水杨酸/治疗应用治疗结果    
Abstract:【Objective】 To explore the clinical efficacy and safety of combination therapy with Vedolizumab and Mesalazine in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease.【Methods】 A total of 84 patients with inflammatory bowel disease admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanyang Medical College from January 2021 to December 2022 were selected. They were randomly divided into a conventional group and a combination group using a random number table method, with 42 patients in each group. The conventional group was given Mesalazine, while the combination group was given Vedrizumab in addition to the conventional group. The treatment effect was observed in both groups at week 8. We compared the clinical efficacy, peripheral blood inflammatory factors [serum interleukin-4 (IL-4), interleukin-17 (IL-17)], and inflammatory bowel disease quality of life questionnaire (IBDQ) scores between two groups, and recorded the occurrence of adverse drug reactions during treatment.【Results】 The total effective rate of the combined group was 95.24%(40/42), which was higher than the conventional group's 78.57%(33/42), and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=5.126, P<0.05). After treatment, the serum levels of IL-4 and IL-17 in both groups of patients were lower than before treatment, and the combined group was lower than the conventional group, with statistical significance (P<0.05). The IBDQ scores of the conventional group and the combination group before treatment were (115.89±12.93) points and (113.27±11.85) points, respectively. After treatment, the scores of the two groups were (182.34±15.48) points and (198.15±7.26) points, respectively. After treatment, the IBDQ scores of the two groups of patients were higher than before treatment, and the combination group was higher than the conventional group, with a statistically significant difference (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups (χ2=0.156, P=0.693). 【Conclusion】 The combination of Vedolizumab and Mesalazine in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease can enhance the therapeutic effect, inhibit the synthesis of inflammatory factors, improve the quality of life of patients, and have good safety.
Key wordsInflammatory Bowel Diseases/DT    Antibodies, Monoclonal/TU    Mesalamine/TU    Treatment Outcome
收稿日期: 2023-03-14     
中图分类号:  R574  
通讯作者: *E-mail:253323164@qq.com   
引用本文:   
马真真, 朱冰洋, 方金涛. 维得利珠单抗联合美沙拉嗪治疗炎症性肠病的临床疗效及安全性分析[J]. 医学临床研究, 2024, 41(1): 95-98.
MA Zhenzhen, ZHU Bingyang, FANG Jintao. Clinical Efficacy and Safety Analysis of the Combination of Vedolizumab and Mesalazine in the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RESEARCH, 2024, 41(1): 95-98.
链接本文:  
http://journal07.magtech.org.cn/yxlcyj/CN/10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2024.01.026     或     http://journal07.magtech.org.cn/yxlcyj/CN/Y2024/V41/I1/95
版权所有 © 2013 医学临床研究杂志社  湘ICP备13012052号-1
办公地址:湖南省长沙市芙蓉区新军路43号煤炭大院主办公楼6楼621、623、632、636室 邮编:410011 电话(传真):0731-84824007 E-mail:jcr_cs.hn@vip.163.com
技术支持:北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn