医学临床研究
  2025年4月3日 星期四           首 页    |    期刊简介    |    编委会    |    投稿指南    |    期刊订阅    |    广告合作    |    留言板    |    联系我们    |    English
医学临床研究  2023, Vol. 40 Issue (1): 71-73    DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2023.01.021
  论著 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
功能性吸附性义齿与传统性活动义齿修复牙列缺失的疗效比较
李朝辉
上海市闵行区华漕社区卫生服务中心口腔科,上海 201107
Comparison of the Effects of Functional Adsorptive Dentures and Traditional Removable Dentures in the Restoration of Dentition Loss
LI Chao-hui
Department of Stomatological,Shanghai Minhang District Huacao Community Health Service Center,Shanghai 201107
全文: PDF (1104 KB)   HTML (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 【目的】 对比功能性吸附性义齿与传统性活动义齿修复牙列缺失的临床效果。【方法】 2020年9月至2021年8月本院收治的86例牙列缺失行全口义齿修复患者,采用随机数字表法分为对照组(给予传统性活动义齿修复)和观察组(给予功能性吸附性义齿修复),每组43例。对比两组患者义齿固位和稳定性评分、咀嚼效率、舒适度、黏膜压痛点数及主观满意度。【结果】 修复后,观察组上颌、下颌义齿固位和稳定性评分均高于对照组(P<0.05)。修复前,两组患者咀嚼效率和舒适度比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);修复后,观察组咀嚼效率和舒适度高于对照组(P<0.05)。修复后3 d、5 d,观察组上颌、下颌黏膜压痛点数低于对照组(P<0.05);修复后3个月,观察组满意度高于对照组(P<0.05)。【结论】 与传统性活动义齿修复相比,功能性吸附性义齿修复可提高义齿固位和稳定性评分、咀嚼效率、舒适度,降低黏膜压痛点数,并可提高患者满意度。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
李朝辉
关键词 牙缺失 牙修复体 治疗结果    
Abstract【Objective】 To compare the clinical effects of functional adsorptive denture and traditional removable denture in repairing dentition loss. 【Methods】 From September 2020 to August 2021, 86 patients with dentition loss who underwent complete denture restoration in our hospital were randomly divided into control group (traditional removable denture restoration) and observation group (functional adsorption denture restoration) with 43 cases in each group. The retention and stability scores, masticatory efficiency, comfort, mucosal tenderness points and subjective satisfaction were compared between the two groups. 【Results】 After restoration, the retention and stability scores of maxillary and mandibular dentures in the observation group were higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). Before repair, there was no significant difference in masticatory efficiency and comfort between the two groups (P>0.05); After repair, the masticatory efficiency and comfort of the observation group were higher than those of the control group (P<0.05). On the 3rd and 5th day after repair, the tenderness points of maxillary and mandibular mucosa in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05); Three months after repair, the satisfaction of the observation group was higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). 【Conclusion】 Compared with traditional removable dentures, functional adsorption dentures can improve denture retention and stability scores, masticatory efficiency, comfort, reduce mucosal tenderness points, and improve patient satisfaction.
Key wordsTooth Loss    Dental Prosthesis    Treatment Outcome
收稿日期: 2022-10-26     
中图分类号:  R781  
引用本文:   
李朝辉. 功能性吸附性义齿与传统性活动义齿修复牙列缺失的疗效比较[J]. 医学临床研究, 2023, 40(1): 71-73.
LI Chao-hui. Comparison of the Effects of Functional Adsorptive Dentures and Traditional Removable Dentures in the Restoration of Dentition Loss. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RESEARCH, 2023, 40(1): 71-73.
链接本文:  
http://journal07.magtech.org.cn/yxlcyj/CN/10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2023.01.021     或     http://journal07.magtech.org.cn/yxlcyj/CN/Y2023/V40/I1/71
版权所有 © 2013 医学临床研究杂志社  湘ICP备13012052号-1
办公地址:湖南省长沙市芙蓉区新军路43号煤炭大院主办公楼6楼621、623、632、636室 邮编:410011 电话(传真):0731-84824007 E-mail:jcr_cs.hn@vip.163.com
技术支持:北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn