Abstract：【Objective】To analyze the effect of orthodontic extraction on the thickness of alveolar bone in Angle Ⅱ class 1 malocclusion patients with vertical bone surface. 【Methods】From August 2016 to September 2020,a total of 80 patients with vertical bone surface type of Angle Ⅱ type 1 malocclusion,who were treated in Baoji Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Baoji Hospital of Stomatology and Weinan People's Hospital,were selected in the study. According to the Angle of mandibular plane Angle (MP-SN) and facial height index,patients were divided into the high Angle group,low Angle group and average Angle group. All patients were treated with orthodontic extraction and the changes of alveolar bone thickness were analyzed. 【Results】After treatment,the total thickness of alveolar bone at the maxillofacial distance of 6 mm and 9mm from the cementum enamel boundary(CEJ) in the high Angle group and the low Angle group decreased. The high Angle group was lower than the low Angle group; and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).In the high-angle group,the total alveolar bone thickness and labial alveolar bone thickness of the right mandibular occlusal surface from CEJ 3 mm,6 mm and 9 mm decreased the most,while the total apical point thickness and the total alveolar bone thickness from CEJ 9 mm and labial and palatal bone thickness from CEJ 6 mm decreased the most in the left occlusal surface (P<0.05).The thickness of palatal alveolar bone at 3 mm from CEJ in the high Angle group was significantly decreased,and the thickness of alveolar bone at 3 mm,6 mm and 9 mm from CEJ in the low Angle group was significantly decreased (P<0.05).After treatment,the buccal lingual thickness of the proximal and distal middle root in the low Angle group was significantly reduced,and the buccal alveolar bone thickness in the high Angle group was significantly reduced (P<0.05).The reduction in the labial side of the mesial root in the high Angle group was higher than that in the low Angle group (P<0.05). 【Conclusion】Orthodontic extraction can reduce the alveolar bone thickness in Angle Ⅱ type 1 malocclusion patients with high angle of vertical bone surface. The treatment should be carefully chosen.
祁海龙, 高静, 王斯璐. 正畸拔牙矫治对AngleⅡ 1类错牙合垂直骨面型患者牙槽骨厚度的影响[J]. 医学临床研究, 2022, 39(12): 1814-1818.
QI Hai-long, GAO Jing, WANG Si-lu. Effect of Orthodontic Extraction on Thickness of Alveolar Bone in Angle Ⅱ Class 1 Malocclusion with Vertical Bone Surface. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 39(12): 1814-1818.
[1] 冯凯悦,梁永强,方俊. 不同垂直骨面型上切牙牙槽骨密度的研究[J].检验医学与临床,2019,16(3):308-311.
[2] 郝璐, 刘琳. 成人骨性Ⅱ类错牙合畸形治疗前后上尖牙牙槽骨形态的CBCT研究[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2020,36(2):351-355.
[3] SERGIO P,ROBERTO R,ROSARIA B,et al. Impact of functional orthodontic treatment on facial attractiveness of children with Class Ⅱ divisionⅠmalocclusion[J].Eur J Orthod,2019,11(8):235-238.
[4] 姜委杰,刘珺,刘昌翠,等. 锥形束CT评价成人安氏Ⅱ1类拔牙后上前牙内收前后牙槽骨变化[J].中国组织工程研究,2019,23(19):40-44.
[5] 朱利娟,张立娜.双力矫治器治疗对骨性Ⅱ类错牙合患者软组织轮廓的影响[J].医学临床研究,2021,38(11):1721-1723.
[6] 邓建清,卢新华,彭彩霞,等. 安氏Ⅱ类1分类错(牙合)正畸治疗前后前牙区牙槽骨高度改变的CBCT研究[J].中华口腔正畸学杂志,2018,25(3):135-139.
[7] 鲁琦澔,张卫兵. 成人骨性Ⅱ类患者不同垂直骨面型上颌后牙区牙槽骨复合体形态比较的CBCT分析[J].口腔医学,2020,40(5):53-57.
[8] IWATA M,SAITO A,KURODA Y,et al. Interdisciplinary therapy for severe periodontitis with Angle Class Ⅱ Division 1 malocclusion:A case report with 7-year follow-up[J].J Am Dent Assoc,2019,150(11):960-971.
[9] 邹崇飞, 邓怡. 不同骨面型双颌前突患者正畸拔牙治疗后唇部软组织变化的临床研究[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2020,36(2):335-338.
[10] 田雅兰,孙景璐,李洪发. 成人低角型骨性Ⅱ类错牙合上前牙区牙槽骨形态的CBCT研究[J].中华口腔正畸学杂志,2019,26(3):126-130.
[11] 刘晔,沈悦,张士珑,等. 不同垂直骨面型安氏Ⅱ~1类错牙合畸形牙弓宽度分析[J].现代口腔医学杂志,2020,19(8):185-187.
[12] 郄会,樊世锋,窦晨雷,等. 青少年不同垂直骨面型上下颌牙槽骨皮质骨厚度及密度的差异[J].中华口腔正畸学杂志,2020,27(3):125-128.
[13] NI J,SONG S,ZHOU N.Impact of surgical orthodontic treatment on quality of life in Chinese young adults with class Ⅲ malocclusion:a longitudinal study[J].BMC Oral Health,2019,19(1):135-137.
[14] 朱晓美,李放. 成人骨性Ⅱ~1分类错高角骨面型下颌尖牙区牙槽骨形态的锥形束CT研究[J].安徽医学,2020,41(3):64-66.
2022, Vol. 39 
