医学临床研究
  2025年4月10日 星期四           首 页    |    期刊简介    |    编委会    |    投稿指南    |    期刊订阅    |    广告合作    |    留言板    |    联系我们    |    English
医学临床研究  2020, Vol. 37 Issue (5): 655-657    DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2020.05.005
  论著 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
免疫抑制模型大鼠脑脊液中两种新型隐球菌感染的检测方法比较
刘华1, 匡晓妮1, 贺湘玲2, 陈铁强1**, 田鑫2, 邹惠2, 游亚兰2
1.长沙市妇幼保健院儿童保健科,湖南 长沙 410005;
2.湖南师范大学第一附属医院暨湖南省人民医院儿科医学中心,湖南 长沙 410007
Comparison of Two Methods for Detecting Cryptococcus Neoformans Infection in Cerebrospinal Fluid of Immunosuppression Model Rats
LIU Hua, KUANG Xiao-ni, HE Xiang-ling, et al
Changsha City Maternal and Child Health Care,Changsha,410005)
全文: PDF (0 KB)   HTML (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 【目的】 比较免疫抑制模型大鼠脑脊液中两种新型隐球菌感染的检测方法的检出率。【方法】 将60只雄性大鼠,随机分为A、B、C、D组,A组和C组大鼠实验d1一次性腹腔注射环磷酰胺(150 mg/kg),B组和D组腹腔注射等量1 mL生理盐水;实验d4 A组和B组大鼠尾静脉注射1 mL浓度为1×106新型隐球菌悬液,建立大鼠感染模型,C组和D组大鼠注射1 mL生理盐水作为阴性对照。实验d6收集四组大鼠的脑脊液,同时采用荧光定量聚合酶链式反应法(FQ-PCR)和墨汁染色方法检测四组大鼠脑脊液,比较两种方法的新型隐球菌感染阳性检出率。【结果】 新型隐球菌FQ-PCR方法检测新型隐球菌感染阳性检出率高于墨汁染色方法,其差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。【结论】 FQ-PCR检测大鼠脑脊液中新型隐球菌感染阳性率优于墨汁染色,可用于临床检测脑脊液中是否存在新型隐球菌感染。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
关键词 隐球菌病/诊断免疫抑制大鼠    
Abstract【Objective】 Real-time fluorescent quantitative PCR (FQ-PCR) and ink staining were used to detect rat cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in a rat model of Cryptococcus neoformans infection. The sensitivity and specificity of the two methods were compared to provide laboratory basis for clinical application. 【Methods】 Sixty male rats were randomly divided into four groups: group A and group C were injected with cyclophosphamide (150 mg/kg) once on the first day of the experiment, while group B and group D were injected with the same amount of 1 mL saline intraperitoneally. To establish infection model, rats in group A and group B were injected with 1 mL (containing 1×106)of Cryptococcus neoformans suspension in the tail vein on the fourth day of the experiment, while rats in group C and group D received 1 ml saline as negative control. On the 6th day of the experiment, the cerebrospinal fluid of all rats was collected. Then Cryptococcus in cerebrospinal fluid of the four groups was detected by FQ-PCR and stained with ink at the same time. The results from the two methods were compared. 【Results】 The positive detection rate of Cryptococcus neoformans by FQ-PCR was higher than that of ink staining, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). 【Conclusion】 FQ-PCR system is superior to ink staining in detecting Cryptococcus neoformans in cerebrospinal fluid of rats. It can be used for clinical detection of the presence of Cryptococcus neoformans infection in cerebrospinal fluid.
Key wordsCryptococcosis/DI    Immunological Function    Rats
收稿日期: 2018-10-10     
PACS:  R519.4  
基金资助:湖南省科技厅科技计划项目(编号:2013FJ6028)
通讯作者: E-mail:2598481353@qq.com   
引用本文:   
刘华, 匡晓妮, 贺湘玲, 陈铁强, 田鑫, 邹惠, 游亚兰. 免疫抑制模型大鼠脑脊液中两种新型隐球菌感染的检测方法比较[J]. 医学临床研究, 2020, 37(5): 655-657.
LIU Hua, KUANG Xiao-ni, HE Xiang-ling, et al. Comparison of Two Methods for Detecting Cryptococcus Neoformans Infection in Cerebrospinal Fluid of Immunosuppression Model Rats. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RESEARCH, 2020, 37(5): 655-657.
链接本文:  
http://journal07.magtech.org.cn/yxlcyj/CN/10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2020.05.005     或     http://journal07.magtech.org.cn/yxlcyj/CN/Y2020/V37/I5/655
版权所有 © 2013 医学临床研究杂志社  湘ICP备13012052号-1
办公地址:湖南省长沙市芙蓉区新军路43号煤炭大院主办公楼6楼621、623、632、636室 邮编:410011 电话(传真):0731-84824007 E-mail:jcr_cs.hn@vip.163.com
技术支持:北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn