医学临床研究
  2025年7月26日 星期六           首 页    |    期刊简介    |    编委会    |    投稿指南    |    期刊订阅    |    广告合作    |    留言板    |    联系我们    |    English
医学临床研究  2020, Vol. 37 Issue (1): 83-85    DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2020.01.026
  论著 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
头皮神经阻滞在立体定向颅内血肿清除术中对高血压脑出血患者应激状态及脑血流的影响
赵广平, 史炯, 程晶晶, 陈永学
河北省邯郸市中心医院,河北 邯郸 056008
Effect of Scalp Nerve Block on Stress Status and Cerebral Blood Flow in Patients with Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage during Stereotactic Intracranial Hematoma Removal
ZHAO Guang-ping, SHI Jiong, CHENG Jing-jing,et al
Handan Central Hospital, Hebei 056008
全文: PDF (0 KB)   HTML (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 【目的】 比较头皮神经阻滞(SNB)麻醉与局部浸润麻醉立体定向颅内血肿清除术对高血压脑出血患者应激状态及脑血流指标的影响。【方法】 回顾性分析2017 年6月至2018年12月本院收治的102例行立体定向颅内血肿清除术的高血压脑出血患者的临床资料,根据麻醉方式的不同将其分为阻滞麻醉组和浸润麻醉组,各51例。比较两组入室时(T0)、切头皮时(T1)、钻颅骨时(T2)、缝皮时(T3)血清空腹血糖(FPG)、皮质醇(Cor)水平及动脉血氧分压(PaO2)、动脉血氧分压(PaCO2)、动脉血氧饱和度(SaO2)和平均动脉压(MAP)的变化。【结果】 阻滞麻醉组T0、T1、T2、T3时PaO2、PaCO2、SaO2、MAP比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。浸润麻醉组T1、T2、T3时PaO2低于T0,PaCO2、MAP高于T0,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。浸润麻醉组T1、T2、T3时PaO2低于阻滞麻醉组,PaCO2、MAP高于阻滞麻醉组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。阻滞麻醉组T0、T1、T2、T3时血清FPG、Cor水平差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。浸润麻醉组T1、T2、T3时FPG、Cor水平均高于T0,且均高于同时点阻滞麻醉组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。【结论】 高血压脑出血患者行立体定向颅内血肿清除术采用头皮神经阻滞麻醉对脑血流影响小,应激反应轻,效果及安全性均优于局部浸润麻醉。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
赵广平
史炯
程晶晶
陈永学
关键词 脑出血/外科学高血压/病因学血肿/外科学神经传导阻滞    
Abstract【Objective】To compare the effect of stereotactic intracranial hematoma removal with SNB anesthesia and local infiltration anesthesia on stress state and cerebral blood flow index in patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage.【Methods】The clinical data of 102 patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage who underwent stereotactic evacuation of intracranial hematoma from June 2017 to December 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. According to the different anesthesia methods, they were divided into block anesthesia group and infiltration anesthesia group, 51 cases each; the changes of serum fasting blood glucose (FPG), cortisol (Cor) level and arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2), arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaCO2), arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were compared between the two groups when entering the chamber (T0), at scalp incision (T1), at craniotomy (T2) and at suture (T3). 【Results】 There was no significant difference between PaO2, PaCO2, SaO2 and MAP at T0, T1, T2, T3 in the block anesthesia group (P>0.05). In the invasive anesthesia group, PaO2 was lower than T0 at T1, T2, T3, and PaCO2, MAP was higher than T0, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05); the PaO2 was lower in the invasive anesthesia group T1, T2, T3 than in the block anesthesia group, and PaCO2, MAP was higher than in the block anesthesia group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in serum FPG and Cor levels in the block anesthesia group T0, T1, T2, T3(P>0.05). The average water of FPG and Cor in the invasive anesthesia group T1, T2, T3 was higher than that of T0, and all were higher than those in the simultaneous point block anesthesia group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).【Conclusion】 Stereotactic evacuation of intracranial hematoma with scalp nerve block anesthesia for patients with hypertensive cerebral hemorrhageare has little effect on cerebral blood flow and light stress response with much more safety, and is better than local infiltration anesthesia.
Key wordsCerebral Hemorrhage/SU    Hypertension/ET    Hematoma/SU    Nerve Block
收稿日期: 2019-03-19     
PACS:  R  
引用本文:   
赵广平, 史炯, 程晶晶, 陈永学. 头皮神经阻滞在立体定向颅内血肿清除术中对高血压脑出血患者应激状态及脑血流的影响[J]. 医学临床研究, 2020, 37(1): 83-85.
ZHAO Guang-ping, SHI Jiong, CHENG Jing-jing,et al. Effect of Scalp Nerve Block on Stress Status and Cerebral Blood Flow in Patients with Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage during Stereotactic Intracranial Hematoma Removal. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RESEARCH, 2020, 37(1): 83-85.
链接本文:  
http://journal07.magtech.org.cn/yxlcyj/CN/10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2020.01.026     或     http://journal07.magtech.org.cn/yxlcyj/CN/Y2020/V37/I1/83
版权所有 © 2013 医学临床研究杂志社  湘ICP备13012052号-1
办公地址:湖南省长沙市芙蓉区新军路43号煤炭大院主办公楼6楼621、623、632、636室 邮编:410011 电话(传真):0731-84824007 E-mail:jcr_cs.hn@vip.163.com
技术支持:北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn