医学临床研究
  2025年7月25日 星期五           首 页    |    期刊简介    |    编委会    |    投稿指南    |    期刊订阅    |    广告合作    |    留言板    |    联系我们    |    English
医学临床研究  2019, Vol. 36 Issue (3): 472-473    DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2019.03.019
  论著 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
罗哌卡因与左旋布比卡因用于剖宫产手术腰硬联合麻醉的临床效果
李占兵, 石军, 李菊
安徽省淮南市第一人民医院麻醉科,安徽 淮南 232007
Clinical Analysis of Ropivacaine and Levobupivacaine for Combined Spinal and Epidural Anesthesia in Caesarean Section
LI Zhan-bing, SHI Jun, LI,Ju
First People's Hospital of Huainan City, Anhui Province 232007
全文: PDF (0 KB)   HTML (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 【目的】探讨罗哌卡因与左旋布比卡因在剖宫产手术腰硬联合麻醉(CSEA)中的临床效果。【方法】剖宫产手术患者60例随机分为两组,各30例。两组均给予CSEA,对照组采用左旋布比卡因麻醉,观察组采用罗哌卡因麻醉,比较两组麻醉效果、术中血流动力学及药物不良反应发生率。【结果】观察组感觉阻滞起效时间、运动阻滞起效时间,长于对照组(P<0.05);观察组感觉阻滞持续、术后运动恢复时间及Bromege评分均短(低)于对照组(P<0.05);两组感觉阻滞起效时(T1)、感觉最大阻滞后(T2)及感觉恢复后(T3)SBP、DBP及HR水平相比较差异均无显著性(P>0.05);两组T1、T2及T3时SBP、DBP及HR水平均低于T0时(P<0.05);观察组麻醉后头痛、恶心呕吐、腹泻、低血压、呼吸抑制发生率均低于对照组(P<0.05)。【结论】罗哌卡因与左旋布比卡因用于剖宫产手术CSEA中均能取得良好的麻醉效果,但是罗哌卡因对患者血流动力学影响较小,药物不良反应发生率较低,值得推广应用。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
关键词 剖宫产术酰胺类/投药和剂量布比卡因/投药和剂量麻醉硬膜外    
Abstract:【Objective】To investigate the clinical effects of ropivacaine and levobupivacaine in combined spinal and epidural anesthesia(CSEA) for caesarean section. 【Methods】A total of 60 patients with cesarean section were randomly divided into two groups: the control group and the observation group (n=30 in each group). All patients received CSEA. The control group was anesthetized with levobupivacaine,while the observation group was anesthetized with ropivacaine. The anesthetic effect, intraoperative hemodynamics and adverse drug reaction rate were compared between the two groups. 【Results】The onset time of sensory block and the onset time of motor block were longer in the observation group than in the control group (P<0.05). The sensory block duration, postoperative exercise recovery time and Bromege score in the observation group were all shorter (lower) in the control group. There were no significant differences in the levels of SBP, DBP and HR between two group at the time points of T1 (onset of sensory blockage), T2 (maximum sensory blockage) and T3 (sensory recovery) (P>0.05). SBP, DBP and HR of two groups at T1, T2 and T3 were lower than those at T0 (P<0.05). The incidence of headache, nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, hypotension and respiratory depression were significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group (P<0.05). 【Conclusion】Ropivacaine and levobupivacaine both can achieve good anesthesia in CSEA for caesarean section. However, ropivacaine has less effect on hemodynamics and the incidence of adverse drug reactions is low, and it is worth promoting.
Key wordsCesarean Section    Amides/AD    Bupivacaine/AD    Anesthesia    Epidural
收稿日期: 2018-11-06     
PACS:  R719.8  
引用本文:   
李占兵, 石军, 李菊. 罗哌卡因与左旋布比卡因用于剖宫产手术腰硬联合麻醉的临床效果[J]. 医学临床研究, 2019, 36(3): 472-473.
LI Zhan-bing, SHI Jun, LI,Ju. Clinical Analysis of Ropivacaine and Levobupivacaine for Combined Spinal and Epidural Anesthesia in Caesarean Section. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 36(3): 472-473.
链接本文:  
http://journal07.magtech.org.cn/yxlcyj/CN/10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2019.03.019     或     http://journal07.magtech.org.cn/yxlcyj/CN/Y2019/V36/I3/472
版权所有 © 2013 医学临床研究杂志社  湘ICP备13012052号-1
办公地址:湖南省长沙市芙蓉区新军路43号煤炭大院主办公楼6楼621、623、632、636室 邮编:410011 电话(传真):0731-84824007 E-mail:jcr_cs.hn@vip.163.com
技术支持:北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn