|
|
Effect of Combined Warming Measures-assisted Anesthesia Recovery Intervention on Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Total Hysterectomy |
ZHAO Xiaojuan, ZHOU Ping, LI Na |
Department of Surgical Anesthesia, Puyang Oilfield General Hospital, Puyang Henan 457001 |
|
|
Abstract 【Objective】 To investigate the application of combined warming measures-assisted anesthesia recovery intervention in patients undergoing laparoscopic total hysterectomy (TLH).【Methods】 A total of 80 patients undergoing TLH were randomly divided into two groups: a control group and an observation group, with 40 patients in each group. The control group received routine nursing care, while the observation group received combined warming measures-assisted anesthesia recovery intervention. The anesthesia quality, recovery status [Steward Recovery Score (SRS)], body temperature changes [5 minutes pre-anesthesia (T0), 30 minutes after anesthesia induction (T1), 60 minutes after anesthesia induction (T2), at the end of surgery (T3), 10 minutes after transfer to PACU (T4), and at the time of awakening (T5)], postoperative recovery quality [postoperative recovery quality questionnaire (QoR-40) score], and operating room nursing quality score were compared between the two groups.【Results】 The observation group had shorter recovery times for swallowing reflex, eye opening, catheter removal, correct answers to questions, and recovery of orientation compared to the control group (P<0.05). The SRS score of the observation group was higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). The body temperatures at T1 to T5 in the observation group were higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). The QoR-40 score and operating room nursing quality score of the observation group were higher than those of the control group (P<0.05).【Conclusion】 Combined warming measures assisted-anesthesia recovery intervention can effectively improve anesthesia quality, recovery status, and postoperative recovery quality in patients undergoing TLH. It significantly enhances body temperature stability and operating room nursing quality, thereby improving patient comfort and satisfaction postoperatively.
|
Received: 05 November 2024
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 许颖,罗琳雪,黄莎莎,等. 广泛性子宫切除术后胃肠道功能恢复策略的研究进展[J].广西医学,2023,45(22):2764-2767. [2] 谭琳子,文朗. 腹腔镜子宫切除术患者术中体温变化轨迹特征及影响因素分析[J].中国实用护理杂志,2023,39(32):2521-2526. [3] 代恒茂,余遥,刘尚昆,等. 不同频次唤醒护理对全身麻醉胸科腔镜手术后患者苏醒效果的影响[J].护理学杂志,2024,39(7):61-64. [4] 刘晓芳,张春艳,阎莉,等. 复合保温措施在腹腔镜子宫全切术患者手术室护理中的应用[J].中华现代护理杂志,2021,27(2):269-272. [5] 于建海,曹冰. 基于精益管理模式的麻醉护理对妇产科全麻手术患者麻醉质量及安全性的影响[J].国际护理学杂志,2023,42(23):4234-4237. [6] 刘春梅,滕颖,鲍洁. 基于小组管理模式的预见性护理在老年麻醉患者中的应用[J].中华现代护理杂志,2023,29(1):89-92. [7] 朱燕,戴文静. 基于循证的针对性护理模式对儿科手术室护理质量、麻醉苏醒期躁动的影响[J].国际护理学杂志,2024,43(2):319-323. [8] 朱红霞,雷丽丽,邓晓红. 以预防低体温为导向的前瞻性护理结合麻醉苏醒护理在子宫肌瘤患者全麻下子宫切除术中的应用效果[J].临床医学研究与实践,2023,8(36):134-137. [9] 肖英,黄伟,许超,等. 综合保温模式在腹腔镜广泛全子宫切除术患者复苏中的应用[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2021,27(14):152-154. [10] 赵栎珺,张亚敏,蔺黎,等. 达芬奇机器人辅助全子宫切除术后患者正念影响因素的线性回归及改善策略分析[J].机器人外科学杂志(中英文),2024,5(3):466-471. [11] 安晓华,邱服斌,高哲慧,等. 体质指数对腹腔镜子宫全切术中病人低体温发生率的影响[J].护理研究,2021,35(12):2242-2244. [12] 李婷.复合保温护理措施在腹腔镜子宫全切术患者手术室护理中对其体温、术后苏醒的影响[J].云南中医学院学报,2021,44(6):34-36. [13] 郑绘,付琴. 复合保温措施联合麻醉苏醒护理在腹腔镜子宫全切术病人中的应用[J].蚌埠医学院学报,2024,49(8):1121-1125. |
|
|
|