腰硬联合麻醉与全麻对妊高征产妇剖宫产术不良事件及母婴预后的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2023.08.009

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (0)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (1188 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract 【Objective】To investigate the impact of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) and general anesthesia on adverse events during cesarean section and maternal-infant outcomes in pregnant women with hypertension. 【Methods】A total of 84 pregnant women with pregnancy induced hypertension (preeclampsia) admitted to our hospital were randomly divided into two groups,with 42 cases in each group. All women underwent cesarean section,with the control group receiving general anesthesia and the observation group receiving CSEA. The anesthesia conditions and perioperative hemodynamic changes were compared between the two groups. Apgar scores at 1 minute and 5 minutes after birth and umbilical artery blood gas parameters of newborns were compared. The occurrence of anesthesia-related adverse events and maternal-infant outcomes during hospitalization were compared between the two groups. 【Results】 The onset time of anesthesia and the time from anesthesia initiation to delivery were longer in the observation group than in the control group (P<0.05). At the time of fetal delivery (T₁),both groups showed a significant decrease in heart rate and mean arterial pressure compared to before anesthesia (T₀) (P<0.05). At the end of surgery (T₂),heart rate in both groups increased compared to T₀ and T₁,while mean arterial pressure was lower than T₀ and higher than T₁,with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). The heart rate and mean arterial pressure at T₁ and T₂ were higher in the observation group than in the control group (P<0.05). Apgar scores at 1 minute and 5 minutes after birth in the observation group were higher than that in the control group (P<0.05). The observation group had lower carbon dioxide partial pressure (PCO₂) and higher oxygen partial pressure (PO₂) in newborns compared to the control group (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the occurrence rate of overall anesthesia-related adverse reactions and maternal adverse events between the two groups (P>0.05),while the occurrence rate of adverse events in newborns was lower in the observation group than in the control group (P<0.05). 【Conclusion】Both CSEA and general anesthesia have advantages and disadvantages in cesarean section for pregnant women with preeclampsia due to hypertension. General anesthesia has minimal impact on maternal hemodynamics and provides rapid onset of anesthesia but may adversely affect neonatal outcomes. Compared to general anesthesia,CSEA can more effectively ensure the safety of newborns.

Key words： Hypertension,Pregnancy-Induced Cesarean Section Anesthesia,Epidural Anesthesia,General Pregnancy Outcome

Received: 16 October 2022

PACS:

R714.252

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	HAN Ming
	LIU Miao
	ZHANG Dan

Cite this article:

HAN Ming,LIU Miao,ZHANG Dan. Influence of Combined Spinal-epidural Anesthesia and General Anesthesia on Adverse Events of Cesarean Section and Prognosis of Mother and Infant in Pregnant Women with Hypertension[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RESEARCH, 2023, 40(8): 1150-1153.

URL:

http://journal07.magtech.org.cn/yxlcyj/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2023.08.009 OR http://journal07.magtech.org.cn/yxlcyj/EN/Y2023/V40/I8/1150

[1] HAO H,GU X,CAI Y,et al. The influence of pregnancy-induced hypertension syndrome on the metabolism of newborns[J].Transl Pediatr,2021,10(2):296-305.
[2] EL-BOGHDADLY K,DESAI N,HALPERN S,et al. Quadratus lumborum block vs. transversus abdominis plane block for caesarean delivery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis[J].Anaesthesia,2021,76(3):393-403.
[3] OKUCU F,AKSOY M,INCE I,et al. Combined spinal epidural anesthesia in obese parturients undergoing cesarean surgery:a single-blinded randomized comparison of lateral decubitus and sitting positions[J].Anaesthesist,2021,70(1):30-37.
[4] TEIXEIRA JARM,ALVES C,MARTINS C,et al. General anesthesia for emergency cesarean delivery: simulation-based evaluation of residents[J].Braz J Anesthesiol,2021,71(3):254-258.
[5] 中华医学会妇产科学分会妊娠期高血压疾病学组.妊娠期高血压疾病诊治指南(2015)[J].中华围产医学杂志,2016,19(3):161-169.
[6] BOUZADA M C F,NOGUEIRA REIS Z S,BRUM N F F,et al. Perinatal risk factors and Apgar score ≤ 3 in first minute of life in a referral tertiary obstetric and neonatal hospital[J].J Obstet Gynaecol,2020,40(6):820-824.
[7] MARY S,SMALL H,HERSE F,et al. Preexisting hypertension and pregnancy-induced hypertension reveal molecular differences in placental proteome in rodents[J].Physiol Genomics,2021,53(6):259-268.
[8] BEAMON C J,STUEBE A M,EDWARDS L J,et al. Is the type of neuraxial anesthesia associated with adverse neonatal outcomes among patients with preeclampsia[J].J Neonatal Perinatal Med,2020,13(3):331-337.
[9] YOON S W,CHOI G J,SEONG H K,et al. Pharmacological strategies to prevent haemodynamic changes after intubation in parturient women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: a network meta-analysis[J].Int J Med Sci,2021,18(4):1039-1050.
[10] 鲁燕,姚尚龙. 重度子痫前期患者行剖宫产术的麻醉方式选择[J].华中科技大学学报(医学版),2020,49(6):724-727.
[11] LEFFERT L,BUTWICK A,CARVALHO B,et al. The society for obstetric anesthesia and perinatology consensus statement on the anesthetic management of pregnant and postpartum women receiving thromboprophylaxis or higher dose anticoagulants[J].Anesth Analg,2018,126(3):928-944.