|
|
Correlation between Serum HbA1c Level of Pregnant Women with Diabetes in the Third Trimester and Fetal Ultrasound Parameters and Pregnancy Outcome |
WANG Geli, XING Yue, LI Dapeng |
Department of Ultrasonography,Baoji People's Hospital,Baoji Shaanxi 721000 |
|
|
Abstract 【Objective】To investigate the relationship between the serum glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level, fetal ultrasound parameters and pregnancy outcome in patients with diabetes in the third trimester of pregnancy. 【Methods】From March 2021 to March 2022, 80 pregnant women with diabetes in the third trimester in Baoji People's Hospital (the observation group) were selected, and 50 pregnant women with normal blood glucose who had regular prenatal examination in Baoji People's Hospital during the same period were selected as the control group.Two groups of blood glucose levels and fetal ultrasound parameters were compared, including resistance index (RI), pulsatility index (PI), and systolic to diastolic ratio (S/D) of the umbilical and middle cerebral arteries. The observation group was followed up until after delivery, and was divided into a poor group and a good group based on different neonatal outcomes. We compared the serum HbA1c and ultrasound parameters of different groups of parturients. We selected clinical indicators with statistically significant differences and constructed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for the subjects. Logistic regression was used to analyze the risk factors leading to adverse outcomes in newborns.【Results】The observation group had significantly higher levels of HbA1c, fasting blood glucose (FPG), 2-hour postprandial blood glucose (2hPG), and umbilical artery S/D than the control group, while the middle cerebral artery S/D was lower than the control group (P<0.05); There was no statistically significant difference (P>0.05) between the two groups in terms of umbilical artery RI, umbilical artery PI, middle cerebral artery RI, and middle cerebral artery PI. The levels of HbA1c, FPG, 2hPG, body mass index, and umbilical artery S/D in the poor group were significantly higher than those in the good group, while the middle cerebral artery S/D was lower than those in the good group (P<0.05); There was no statistically significant difference (P>0.05) between the two groups in terms of umbilical artery PI, umbilical artery PI, middle cerebral artery RI, middle cerebral artery PI, age, and gestational age. The ROC curve analysis results show that body mass index HbA1c、FPG、2hPG、 Umbilical artery S/D and middle cerebral artery S/D can be used to evaluate the adverse pregnancy outcome of diabetes patients in the third trimester of pregnancy. The area under the curve is 0.875, 0.864, 0.901, 0.973, 0.873, 0.838, respectively. The logistic regression model analysis results show that body mass index>26.286 kg/m2 HbA1c>6.421%,FPG>6.261 mmol/L,2hPG>8.651 mmol/L,Umbilical artery S/D>3.472 and middle cerebral artery S/D ≤ 3.496 were risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes in pregnant women with diabetes in the third trimester of pregnancy (P<0.05). 【Conclusion】Monitoring the serum HbA1c level, umbilical artery S/D and middle cerebral artery S/D parameters in patients with diabetes in the third trimester of pregnancy has certain clinical significance in judging the intrauterine condition of the fetus and predicting adverse pregnancy outcomes.
|
Received: 14 March 2023
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 宋小玉,姜清英.妊娠期糖尿病孕妇血清miR-16-5p、胎盘组织FGF21 mRNA的表达及意义[J].医学临床研究,2024,41(3):371-374.
[2] LOWE WL J R, SCHOLTENS D M, KUANG A, et al. Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcome follow-up study (hapo fus):Maternal gestational diabetes mellitus and childhood glucose metabolism[J].Diabetes Care,2019,42(3):372-380.
[3] 杨秋敏,杨爱玲.妊娠期糖尿病孕妇胎儿生长受限的危险因素及超声指标对胎儿生长受限的评估价值[J].医学临床研究,2024,41(3):454-457.
[4] KATTINI R, HUMMELEN R, KELLY L. Early gestational diabetes mellitus screening with glycated hemoglobin:a systematic review[J].J Obstet Gynaecol Can,2020,42(11):1379-1384.
[5] 乐杰. 妇产科学[M].7版.北京:人民卫生出版社, 2008:95-96.
[6] PIRMATOVA D, DODKHOEVA M, HASBARGEN U, et al. Screening for gestational diabetes mellitus and pregnancy outcomes:Results from a multicentric study in tajikistan[J].Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes,2022,130(12):821-827.
[7] 刘旭静,刘叶,张瑞肖,等. 二维超声及彩色多普勒超声监测胎儿DV、UV及肾脏参数与GDM孕妇不良妊娠结局的关系[J].湖南师范大学学报(医学版),2022,19(2):218-220.
[8] 杜丹,欧江琴,樊荣华. 糖化血红蛋白、抑制素、肠道菌群与妊娠期糖尿病孕妇不良妊娠结局[J].中国计划生育学杂志,2021,29(6):1180-1184.
[9] 杨严政,周玉娥,李团,等. 孕前体重指数、孕期血红蛋白水平及孕期体重增长对妊娠结局的影响[J].昆明医科大学学报,2022,43(11):112-117.
[10] 冯莉,明静祎,张瀛. 孕前体重指数及孕期增加体重对分娩方式及妊娠结局的影响[J].中国临床医生杂志,2022,50(2):220.
[11] 李霞,王彤,瓮占平,等. 妊娠期糖尿病患者血清空腹血糖、餐后血糖、糖化血红蛋白情况及其与不良妊娠结局的关系研究[J].中国医刊,2022,57(1):57-60.
[12] 徐青,孔丽君,陈淼. 门冬胰岛素对妊娠期糖尿病患者疗效、超声影像学指标及母婴结局的影响[J].中国医师进修杂志,2021,44(5):451-456.
[13] 吴珊,曾小明,王磊. 妊娠期糖尿病患者孕晚期胎儿大脑中动脉血流动力学评估对妊娠结局的影响[J].中国妇幼保健,2021,36(21):4888-4891.
[14] 朱晓青,李勇裴,赵丽燕,等. 孕晚期胎儿超声参数与不良妊娠结局的相关性及其预测价值[J].中华全科医学,2019,17(9):1554-1556. |
|
|
|