|
|
Occurrence and Influencing Factors of Ulnar Nerve Dysfunction in Patients with Humeral Intercondylar Fracture Undergoing Open Reduction and Internal Fixation |
YAN Wei-jing, CAO Hui-chao |
Department of Orthopedics, Xi'an Chengbei Hospital, Xi'an 710016 |
|
|
Abstract 【Objective】 To explore the influencing factors of ulnar nerve dysfunction after open reduction and internal fixation of intercondylar fracture of humerus. 【Methods】 The clinical data of 60 patients with humeral intercondylar fractures treated in our hospital from January 2017 to December 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. The age, gender, fracture classification, surgical approach, ulnar nerve treatment and other intraoperative related factors were recorded, and the patients were followed up. According to whether there was ulnar nerve dysfunction after operation, the patients were divided into asymptomatic group (control group) and symptomatic group (observation group). The risk factors of ulnar nerve dysfunction were analyzed by univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis. 【Results】 There were significant differences in surgical approach, ulnar nerve treatment and plate placement between the two groups (P<0.05); Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the bilateral approach of triceps brachii, anterior ulnar nerve and parallel plate were independent risk factors for postoperative neurological dysfunction (OR=1.992, 2.643, 2.282, P<0.05). 【Conclusion】 The incidence of ulnar nerve dysfunction after open reduction and internal fixation of intercondylar fracture of humerus is high. Bilateral approach of triceps brachii, anterior ulnar nerve and parallel placement of steel plate are independent risk factors of ulnar nerve dysfunction. Clinically, doctors should choose the appropriate surgical approach, plate placement and whether the ulnar nerve is in front according to the individual differences of patients, so as to minimize the occurrence of postoperative ulnar nerve dysfunction.
|
Received: 20 May 2021
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 花克涵, 陈辰, 李庭, 等. 平行或垂直双钢板构型切开复位内固定治疗青年与老年肱骨髁间骨折的疗效比较[J].中华创伤骨科杂志, 2019, 21(9):810-815.
[2] 张文兵, 刘星, 何金洲,等. 切开复位克氏针内固定+石膏外固定治疗儿童Gartland Ⅲ型陈旧性肱骨髁上骨折[J].中华创伤杂志, 2018, 34(5):420-425.
[3] 李明静, 李凡, 徐剑, 等. 克氏针内固定及植骨术治疗儿童陈旧性肱骨外髁骨折[J].中华手外科杂志, 2018, 34(1):17-18.
[4] 李凡, 吴明正, 刘郁东, 等. 三种方法治疗儿童Delee B型肱骨远端经骺板骨折的疗效比较[J].中华小儿外科杂志, 2017, 38(4):301-306.
[5] 孙燕, 肖黎, 何东, 等. 闭合复位克氏针交叉固定治疗儿童屈曲型肱骨髁上骨折[J].中华创伤骨科杂志, 2019, 21(1):70-72.
[6] 宗双乐, 苏立新, 梁卫东,等. 经尺骨鹰嘴截骨入路解剖型垂直双钢板治疗老年人肱骨髁间粉碎骨折32例临床分析[J].中华解剖与临床杂志, 2017, 22(3):236-238.
[7] 蔡俊, 戚盈杰, 顾晓民. 钢板固定尺神经原位还纳与前置治疗肱骨髁间骨折的疗效比较[J].中华创伤杂志, 2019, 35(7):638-643.
[8] 王儒法, 楼跃, 唐凯,等. 手法复位加克氏针内固定治疗儿童屈曲型肱骨髁上Gartland Ⅱ、Ⅲ型骨折[J].中华创伤杂志, 2018, 34(10):949-952.
[9] 李敏, 孟海亮, 苏菲, 等. 关节造影辅助治疗儿童骨折移位≤2 mm肱骨外髁骨折[J].中华创伤骨科杂志, 2018, 20(9):803-805.
[10] 李雄涛, 沈先涛, 伍兴, 等. 超声检查在移位较小或没有移位的儿童肱骨外髁骨折中的应用[J].中华小儿外科杂志, 2017, 38(12):927-931.
[11] 杜喜峰, 顾振坤, 王帅印, 等. 克氏针联合空心螺钉内固定与单纯克氏针内固定治疗儿童新鲜肱骨外髁骨折的疗效比较[J].中华生物医学工程杂志, 2018, 24(2):130-134.
[12] 陈伟, 魏宁, 杜晨光, 等. 顺势双反牵引复位和牵引床复位对手术治疗老年股骨转子间骨折疗效的影响[J].中华创伤杂志, 2017, 33(4):332-337.
[13] 王志刚, 王兆林, 刘栋, 等. 新型股骨撑开复位装置在股骨干骨折闭合复位顺行髓内钉固定术中的应用[J].中华创伤骨科杂志, 2017, 19(2):164-168.
[14] 刘雅克, 周振宇, 陶然,等. 锁定加压钢板内固定治疗人工髋关节置换术后股骨假体周围骨折[J].中华骨科杂志, 2017, 37(15):897-905.
[15] 曹伯雄, 李琴, 卢明水, 等. 切开复位内固定术与非手术治疗多发肋骨骨折疗效的Meta分析[J].中华创伤杂志, 2017, 33(3):275-280. |
|
|
|