|
|
|
| Comparison of Effect and Safety between Modified Prone with Leg Separation and Traditional Prone Position after Lithotomy in Treatment of Complex Kidney Stones |
| DOU Hai-feng, PENG Jun-feng, WANG Yi |
| Department of Urology, Tongchuan People's Hospital, Tongchuan 727000, Shaanxi, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract 【Objective】 To compare the effect and safety of modified prone posture with leg separation and traditional prone posture after lithotomy in the treatment of complex kidney stones. 【Methods】 A total of 120 patients with complex kidney stones treated in our hospital were randomly divided into the observation group (n=60) and the control group (n=60). Patients in the observation group were in the modified prone with leg separation to receive percutaneous nephrolithotomy(PCNL); while patients in the group were in the conventional prone after lithotomy for PCNL. The surgical efficacy and complications were compared between the two groups. 【Results】 The operation time and channel establishment time of the observation group were shorter than those of the control group; and the intraoperative blood loss in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). In the observation group, the hospitalization time and the first exhaust time were shorter, the reoperation rate was lower, and the rate of stone removal was higher than in the control group (P<0.05). The VAS score of the observation group was lower than that of the control group after surgery (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups (P>0.05). The quality of life score in the observation group at 4 weeks after operation was higher than that in the control group; and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). 【Conclusion】For patients with complicated renal calculi, the use of modified prone posture with leg separation during percutaneous nephrolithotripsy can shorten the operation time, increase the rate of stone removal, promote postoperative recovery, and improve the quality of life without increasing complications.
|
|
Received: 29 July 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] Patel RM, Okhunov Z, Clayman RV, et al. Prone versus supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy:what s your position[J].Curr Urol Rep,2017,18(4):26.
[2] Vicentini FC, Perrella R, Souza V, et al. Impact of patient position on the outcomes of percutaneous neprolithotomy for complex kidney stones[J].Int Braz J Urol,2018,44(5):965-971.
[3] 胡卫国,李建兴,叶章群.2019年欧洲泌尿外科学会年会泌尿系结石诊治热点和进展[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2019,40(4):251-252.
[4] Noureldin Y A, Elkoushy M A, Andonian S. External validation of the S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry scoring system[J].Can Urol Assoc J,2015,9(5-6):190-195.
[5] 黄钢,曹建伟,郎根强, 等.俯卧分腿位双镜联合腔内手术治疗复杂性肾结石的临床观察[J].微创医学,2018,13(5):642-644.
[6] Falahatkar S, Mokhtari G, Teimoori M. An update on supine versus prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis[J].Urol J,2016,13(5):2814-2822.
[7] 郭征,骆雨,严春晖, 等.俯卧位经皮肾镜肾结石碎石术中移除腰垫对手术效果的影响[J].山东医药,2019,59(11):72-74.
[8] 苏帅,尹志康,王云龙, 等.俯卧分腿位经皮肾镜碎石取石术治疗肾结石[J].中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版),2018,12(6):364-369.
[9] 王大明,于德新,谢栋栋, 等.改良俯卧分腿位双镜联合处理复杂性肾结石合并同侧输尿管结石的临床研究[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2019,40(9):685-689. |
| [1] |
. [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RESEARCH, 2020, 37(9): 1405-1406. |
|
|
|
|
2020, Vol. 37 
