超声骨刀联合胶原蛋白海绵在下颌低位阻生智齿微创拔除术中的应用效果

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2024.06.024

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (0)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (1230 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract 【Objective】To explore the application effect of ultrasound bone knife combined with Gelatin sponge in minimally invasive extraction of mandibular low impacted wisdom teeth. 【Methods】A total of 210 patients with mandibular low impacted teeth who visited the dental extraction clinic of our hospital from January 2020 to October 2022 were selected as the study subjects. They were divided into group A(using turbo drill extraction), group B(using ultrasonic bone knife extraction), and group C(using ultrasonic bone knife combined with Gelatin sponge extraction) according to different treatment methods, with 70 cases in each group. Three groups of patients were compared in terms of bleeding volume in the extraction socket 30 minutes after tooth extraction, visual analogue scale(VAS) score 3 days after surgery, dry socket syndrome, and lower lip numbness. 【Results】 The bleeding rate of the extraction socket in Group C was 11.43%(8/70) at 30 minutes after tooth extraction, significantly lower than 37.14%(26/70) in Group A and 18.57%(13/70) in Group B, with statistical significance(χ²=23.342, 6.389, P<0.05). The bleeding rate of the extraction socket in Group B was significantly lower than that in Group A at 30 minutes after tooth extraction, with statistical significance(χ²=6.667, P<0.05). The VAS score of Group C patients at 72 hours after surgery was significantly lower than that of Group A and Group B; The VAS score of Group B at 72 hours after surgery was significantly lower than that of Group A, and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05); There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of dry socket syndrome and lower lip numbness among the three groups of patients(P>0.05). 【Conclusion】 Compared to the simple use of turbo drill or ultrasonic bone knife for tooth extraction, using ultrasonic bone knife combined with Gelatin sponge minimally invasive tooth extraction for patients with mandibular low impacted wisdom teeth may not reduce the incidence of postoperative complications such as dry socket syndrome and lower lip numbness, but it can reduce postoperative bleeding and pain, and is worthy of clinical application and promotion.

Key words： Molar, Third/SU Tooth Extraction Piezosurgery Biocompatible Materials

Received: 24 April 2024

PACS:

R782.11

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	CHEN Qian
	DU Ying

Cite this article:

CHEN Qian,DU Ying. The Application Effect of Ultrasound Bone Knife Combined with Gelatin Sponge in Minimally Invasive Extraction of Mandibular Low Impacted Wisdom Teeth[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RESEARCH, 2024, 41(6): 886-888.

URL:

http://journal07.magtech.org.cn/yxlcyj/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2024.06.024 OR http://journal07.magtech.org.cn/yxlcyj/EN/Y2024/V41/I6/886

[1] 张震康, 俞光岩. 口腔颌面外科学[M]. 北京:北京大学医学出版社, 2007.
[2] 林志锐, 朱锦娥, 董翠贤,等. 超声骨刀在下颌复杂阻生牙微创拔除术中的效果及预后观察[J].中国医疗器械信息, 2021, 27(13):99-100.
[3] 苏伟喆, 范亚伟. 超声骨刀联合涡轮钻拔除下颌复杂阻生第三磨牙的早期效果评价[J].山西医药杂志, 2020,49(1):10.
[4] BLUS C , SZMUKLER-MONCLER S. Atraumatic tooth extraction and immediate implant placement with piezosurgery: evaluation of 40 sites after at least 1 year of loading[J].Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent,2010, 30(4):355-363.
[5] 王天祥, 赵跃峰, 邱明. 超声骨刀法与凿骨劈冠法拔除下颌低位阻生智齿的比较研究[J].临床口腔医学杂志, 2012, 28(12):372-374.
[6] 苑绪光, 李天竹, 朱骏飞,等. 医用胶原蛋白海绵预防下颌阻生智齿干槽症的临床应用[J].临床口腔医学杂志, 2019,35(2):92-94.
[7] 程卫林. 超声骨刀拔除下颌水平低位阻生智齿的临床效果观察[J].社区医学杂志,2017,15(2):73-74.
[8] 吴带生, 陈俊兰, 彭伟, 等. 超声骨刀和涡轮手机在复杂下颌阻生智齿拔除中的临床应用[J].中国医学创新,2017,14(24):10-13.
[9] 严嵚, 周月鹏, 杨细虎, 等. 智齿拔牙创不同填塞处理愈合效果比较[J].江苏大学学报(医学版), 2017, 27(5): 442-444.
[10] 张园. 胶原蛋白海绵在阻生牙拔除后的应用效果[J].中国当代医药, 2016, 23(2): 79-81.
[11] DODSON T. Prevention and treatment of dry socket [J].Evid Based Dent,2013, 14(1): 13-14.
[12] 秦蓉, 员东星, 刘晶, 等. 超声骨刀法在下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除中的应用观察[J].实用中西医结合临床,2019,19(4):62-63.
[13] JIANG Q, QIU Y T, YANG J, et al. Piezoelectric versus conventional rotary techniques for impacted third molar extraction [J].Medicine(Baltimaore),2015, 94(41): e1685.
[14] MORASCHINI V, HIDALGO R, PORTO B, et al. Effect of submucosal injection of dexamethasone after third molar surgery [J].Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2016, 45(2): 232-240.
[15] 苏伟,范亚伟. 超声骨刀联合涡轮钻拔除下颌复杂阻生第三磨牙的早期效果评价[J].山西医药杂志,2020,49(1): 10-12.
[16] 白希婧,吕东升. 超声骨刀在口腔颌面外科的应用进展[J].中国医疗器械信息,2020,26(15):47-48.
[17] 赵宏霞. 超声骨刀拔牙法对下颌阻生牙患者术后 VAS 评分及张口受限度的影响 [J].临床研究,2020,28(11):83-85.
[18] KIM Y K, YUN P Y, LEE H J, et al. Ridge preservation of the molar extraction socket using collagen sponge and xeno-geneic bone grafts[J].Implant Dent,2011, 20(4): 267-272.
[19] 孙铁忠, 王鹏来, 刘超, 等. 胶原蛋白海绵在预防阻生牙拔除后干槽症的应用[J].中国煤炭工业医学杂志, 2011,14(10): 1433-1434.
[20] 张文鹏.Ⅰ型胶原蛋白对兔骨髓间充质干细胞成骨分化作用的实验研究[D]. 青岛:青岛大学, 2009.
[21] MACKIE E J. Osteoblasts, novel roles in orchestration of skeletal architecture[J].Int J Biochem Cell Biol,2003, 35(9): 1301-1305.
[22] 王尚华,韩瑞,程如玉,等.干槽症防治的研究进展[J].临床医药文献电子杂志, 2018,5(90):195-197.