高强度超声聚焦与子宫动脉栓塞术联合宫腔镜下清宫术治疗剖宫产瘢痕部位妊娠的疗效对比

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2022.12.008

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (13)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (1142 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract 【Objective】To compare the effect of high intensity focused ultrasound(HIFU)or uterine artery embolization(UAE)combined with hysteroscope in the treatment of type Ⅱ cesarean scar pregnancy(CSP). 【Methods】A retrospective analysis was performed in 157 patients diagnosed with CSP ( type Ⅱ) and treated in our hospital from June 2018 to December 2019. Among them,82 patients were treated with HIFU combined with hysteroscope(the HIFU group)and 75 patients were treated with UAE combined with hysteroscope(the UAE group). Clinical efficacy was compared between the two groups. 【Results】The amount of bleeding during the operation in the UAE group(155.33±40.35)mL is much less than that in the HIFU group (189.84±50.64)mL(P<0.05);The operation time of the UAE group (26.12±10.02)min was shorter than that in the HIFU group (32.33±14.57)min (P<0.05);The decrease of hemoglobin (Hb) on the first day after surgery in UAE group (5.53±6.47) g/L was less than that in the HIFU group (7.93±7.85) g/L (P<0.05).Follow-up the menstrual recovery,patients with hypomenorrhea in the HIFU group (15.85%) were significantly less than that in the UAE group (26.66%) (P<0.05).Compared to the decrease of β-HCG on the third day after operation,the time of vaginal bleeding after operation,the number of cases with uterine diverticulum during the operation and the number of cases undergo second operation,there were no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). 【Conclusion】Either HIFU or UAE combined with hysteroscope can effectively treat CSP. However,the UAE group is superior to HIFU group in reducing hemorrhage during operation and HIFU group is superior to UAE group in protecting reproductive function.

Key words： Uterine Artery Embolization Hysteroscopy Ultrasonography Pregnancy, Ectopic/SU Treatment Outcome

Received: 09 August 2021

PACS:

R719.81

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	WU Hui
	HUANG Li-hui
	LI Xue-ying

Cite this article:

WU Hui,HUANG Li-hui,LI Xue-ying. Clinical Analysis of High Intensity Focused Ultrasound or Uterine Artery Embolization Combined with Hysteroscope in the Treatment of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 39(12): 1785-1788.

URL:

http://journal07.magtech.org.cn/yxlcyj/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2022.12.008 OR http://journal07.magtech.org.cn/yxlcyj/EN/Y2022/V39/I12/1785

[1] 谢红宁,林美芳.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠与瘢痕憩室超声诊断及其临床意义[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2018,34(8):838-841.
[2] ZHANG B,JIANG Z B,HUANG M S,et al.Uterine artery embolization combined with methotrexate in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy:results of a case series and review of the literature[J].J Vasc Interv Radiol,2012,23(12):1582-1588.
[3] 严凤,李全香,魏杏茹,等.高强度聚焦超声治疗剖宫产瘢痕部位妊娠的效果分析[J].河北医科大学学报,2019,40(12):1413-1416.
[4] ZHU X G,DENG X L,XUE M.High-intensity focused ultrasound combined with suction curettage for the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy[J].Medicine (Baltimore),2015,94(18):e854.
[5] 金力,陈蔚琳,周应芳.剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠诊治专家共识(2016)[J].全科医学临床与教育,2017,15(1):5-9.
[6] 蓝爱琴.子宫动脉灌注MTX与栓塞后清宫用于子宫瘢痕妊娠的临床疗效观察[J].妇产与遗传(电子版),2019,9(3):33-37.
[7] 钟碧婷.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的分型及其与治疗的相关性[J].现代妇产科进展,2020,29(1):68-70.
[8] 洪菱,王建军.Ⅱ型和Ⅲ型子宫瘢痕妊娠不同手术方式治疗效果的临床研究[J].医学研究杂志,2019,48(2):140-145.
[9] 刘宝.宫腔镜治疗部分Ⅱ型子宫瘢痕妊娠的临床研究[J].现代妇产科进展,2020,29(2):141-143.
[10] 王祉麟,谭菲,张丹.剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠的预处理方法探讨[J].成都医学院学报,2020,15(1):102-104.
[11] 林振江.高强度聚焦超声与子宫动脉栓塞辅助负压吸宫术治疗剖宫产瘢痕部位妊娠的有效性和安全性比较[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2020,36(4):365-369.
[12] 张彬.高强度聚焦超声联合清宫术治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的疗效[J].医学信息,2020,33(6):115-117.
[13] 陈燕,蒋静.高强度聚焦超声联合宫腔镜治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠22例分析[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2019,11(5):33-35.