经腹与经会阴超声检查对宫颈机能不全的诊断价值

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2022.03.030

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (1102 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract 【Objective】To explore the value of transabdominal and transperineal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of cervical insufficiency.【Methods】A total of 84 pregnant women with suspected cervical insufficiency treated in our hospital from January 2017 to June 2019 were randomly divided into transabdominal ultrasound group (transabdominal ultrasound, n=42) and transperineal ultrasound group (transperineal ultrasound group, n=42).Two examination methods were used to compare the projection of amniotic sac into the cervix and the degree of opening of cervical canal, and the diagnostic value of transabdominal ultrasonography and transperineal ultrasonography in cervical insufficiency was analyzed. 【Results】The detection rate of amniotic sac protruding into the cervix in transabdominal ultrasound group was 9.52% (4/42), and there was no significant difference compared with 14.29% (6/42) in the transperineal ultrasound group(χ²=0.454,P=0.500). There was no significant difference between transabdominal ultrasonography and transperineal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of the degree of cervical opening (P>0.05). Compared with the transabdominal ultrasound group, the sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic rate of the transperineal ultrasound group increased, and the missed diagnosis rate and misdiagnosis rate decreased. 【Conclusion】Compared with transabdominal ultrasonography, transperineal ultrasonography has a higher diagnostic rate of cervical insufficiency, and the missed diagnosis rate and misdiagnosis rate are reduced. It is worthy of clinical application.

Key words： Uterine Cervical Incompetence/DI Ultrasonography

Received: 06 December 2021

PACS:

R711.74

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	WU Xiao-mei
	WANG Ye
	LI Yu-de

Cite this article:

WU Xiao-mei,WANG Ye,LI Yu-de. Diagnostic Value of Transabdominal and Transperineal Ultrasonography in Cervical Insufficiency[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 39(3): 429-431.

URL:

http://journal07.magtech.org.cn/yxlcyj/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2022.03.030 OR http://journal07.magtech.org.cn/yxlcyj/EN/Y2022/V39/I3/429

[1] 何庆兰, 廖晓红, 曾红英. 宫颈机能不全经腹部与经阴道超声检查诊断的临床效果观察[J].影像研究与医学应用, 2019, 3(4):170-171.
[2] 秦帆, 张琴, 杨丽华. 宫颈机能不全的临床诊治进展[J].中国卫生标准管理, 2019, 10(6):30-33.
[3] 李介岩, 王欣. 宫颈机能不全的研究进展[J].中国妇幼保健, 2016, 31(19):4081-4086.
[4] 夏恩兰. 《ACOG宫颈环扎术治疗宫颈机能不全指南》解读[J].国际妇产科学杂志, 2016, 43(6):652-656.
[5] 许萍, 戚小艺, 唐妍, 等. 经会阴与经腹部超声检查对宫颈机能不全诊断的对比研究[J].吉林医学, 2014, 35(10):2057-2059.
[6] 张梦莹, 时春艳. 宫颈机能不全的诊治进展[J].中华围产医学杂志, 2016, 19(7):548-551.
[7] 薛洁, 耿献辉. 宫颈机能不全的早期超声诊断及治疗[J].航空航天医学杂志, 2017, 28(2):194-195.
[8] 夏恩兰. 重视宫颈机能不全的防治[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2014, 30(2):81-84.
[9] 赵晨光, 王俊杰. 宫颈环扎术治疗宫颈机能不全18例临床分析[J].中国药物与临床, 2017, 17(1):117-118.
[10] 刘玉翠, 马艳宏. 经会阴与经腹部超声检查在宫颈机能不全诊断中的应用效果比较[J].山东医药, 2015, 55(32):78-79.
[11] 陆韵佳, 王锦珠, 魏素梅. 不同孕期检测宫颈长度预测早产的临床价值[J].现代临床医学, 2014, 40(4):278-280.
[12] JOHNSON S C, YEGUL N T, BALCACER P. Sonovaginography: A Useful Technique in the Assessment of the Lower Genital Tract[J].J Ultrasound Med,2017, 36(9):1917-1933.
[13] 胡术东. 比较经会阴与经腹部超声检查在宫颈机能不全诊断中的应用效果[J].中国医疗器械信息, 2018, 24(16):41-42.
[14] 吴冬, 黄宗华, 刘佼佼, 等. 经会阴与经阴道超声联合诊断孕妇宫颈机能不全的临床价值[J].海南医学, 2018, 29(24):96-98.
[15] 戴云先. 经会阴超声测量宫颈长度及形态对早产预测的临床研究[J].安徽医药, 2017, 21(7):1247-1249.
[16] 金雪鸿, 方友萍, 章海燕, 等. 经会阴部超声测量孕中、晚期宫颈长度对预测早产的应用分析[J].医学影像学杂志, 2016, 26(4):747-749.