|
|
|
| Effect of Laryngeal Mask Ventilation Combined with Intercostal Nerve Block Anesthesia in Modified Radical Mastectomy for Breast Cancer |
| LI Yan, HUANG Ya-qiong |
| People's Liberation Army Joint Support Force 940 Hospital 730050 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract 【Objective】To investigate the anesthetic effect of laryngeal mask ventilation combined with intercostal nerve block anesthesia in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer.【Methods】Seventy-four patients with radical mastectomy were randomly divided into two groups, 37 in each group. The control group was given laryngeal mask general anesthesia, while the observation group was given laryngeal mask ventilation combined with intercostal nerve block anesthesia. The changes of hemodynamics, stress response index and anesthesia safety before induction of anesthesia (T1), during skin incision (T2), 1 hour after skin incision (T3) and 5 minutes after removal of laryngeal mask (T4) were compared between the two groups.【Results】Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and heart rate (HR) at T3 and T4 in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05); there was no significant difference in SBP and HR at four time points in the observation group (P>0.05); SBP and HR at T3 and T4 time points in the control group were higher than those at T1 and T2 time points (P<0.05). Cor and Ang-Ⅱ levels at T2, T3 and T4 in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05); Ang-Ⅱ levels at T4 in the observation group were higher than those at T1 (P<0.05); Cor and Ang-Ⅱ levels at T2, T3 and T4 in the control group were higher than those at T1 (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of perioperative adverse reactions between the two groups (P>0.05).【Conclusion】Laryngeal mask ventilation combined with intercostal nerve block anesthesia for modified radical mastectomy of breast cancer has less influence on intraoperative hemodynamics, which is helpful to reduce perioperative stress response of patients, and has high anesthesia safety. It is worth popularizing and applying.
|
|
Received: 18 January 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 谢笃英. 早期乳腺癌保乳术与改良根治术的临床疗效比较[J]. 医学临床研究, 2017,34(3):542-525.
[2] 张洪江,潘维敏,张林,等.喉罩全麻和气管插管全麻在单孔胸腔镜肺叶切除术中的临床对照研究[J].实用医学杂志,2017,33(3):455-458.
[3] 谭敬,吕瑞兆,严军,等.超声引导下胸部神经阻滞在乳腺癌改良根治术后多模式镇痛中的应用[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2017,33(8):747-750.
[4] Lindner D, Schlothoferschumann K, Kern BC,et al.Cranioplasty using custom-made hydroxyapatite versus titanium: a randomized clinical trial[J].J Neurosurgery,2016, 126(1):1.
[5] 林峥, 韩晓东, 刘中砥, 等. 喉罩通气.七氟醚吸入全麻复合肋间神经阻滞对乳腺癌改良根治术患者应激反应的影响[J].中华医学杂志,2009,89(23):1617-1619.
[6] Kim MH, Kim MS, Lee JH,et al.Can quality of recovery be enhanced by premedication with midazolam:A prospective, randomized, double-blind study in females undergoing breast surgery[J].Medicine,2017, 96(7):e6107.
[7] 胡春阳, 金莲锦, 于仁志,等.老年乳腺癌患者应用喉罩通气复合肋间神经阻滞的术后麻醉恢复效果及护理观察[J].中国现代医生, 2018, 56(26):150-152,156.
[8] 曹伟, 周丹丹, 龚辉,等.肋间神经阻滞复合全身麻醉用于乳腺癌根治手术的临床效果[J].现代肿瘤医学, 2016, 24(18):2971-2975. |
| [1] |
. [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 36(7): 1383-1385. |
|
|
|
|
2019, Vol. 36 
