|
|
|
| Pelvic Floor Ultrasound and Pelvic Floor Muscle Strength Assessment |
| YE Cai-wei |
| Department of Ultrasound, Chengdu Women and Children's Center Hospital, Chengdu 610000, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract 【Objective】To explore the effect of different delivery methods on pelvic floor function by pelvic floor ultrasound and pelvic floor muscle strength evaluation. 【Methods】Sixty-three cases of primipara admitted to our hospital from June 2017 to June 2018 were selected as the research object. According to different delivery methods, the puerperas were divided into cesarean section group (n=33) and natural delivery group (n=30). Another 28 women who came to our hospital for health examination in the same period were selected as the control group. The changes of pelvic floor ultrasonography and pelvic floor muscle strength evaluation indexes were compared between the two groups, and the data were compared with those of the control group. 【Results】In resting state, pelvic floor ultrasonography showed that the bladder neck angle, bladder neck mobility and bladder rotation angle of natural delivery group and cesarean section group were significantly higher than those of control group, while those of natural delivery group were higher than those of cesarean section group, the difference was significant (P<0.05). Pelvic floor muscle strength evaluation results showed that natural delivery group and cesarean section group were significantly higher than those of natural delivery group (P<0.05). The persistent contraction force and maximum contraction force of pelvic floor muscle in the uterine delivery group were lower than those in the control group, while those in the natural delivery group were lower than those in the cesarean section group, and the difference was also statistically significant (P<0.05).【Conclusion】Pelvic floor ultrasonography and pelvic floor muscle strength assessment have certain predictive value for postpartum stress urinary incontinence and organ prolapse.
|
|
Received: 02 April 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 杜燕,沈美玉,张宁宁,等.探究盆底超声检查在女性盆底功能障碍性疾病的临床应用[J].临床检验杂志(电子版),2017,6(04):734-736.
[2] 李一冰.探讨经盆底超声分析妊娠、分娩和盆底肌锻炼对盆底功能的影响[J].中国现代药物应用,2017,11(13):72-73.
[3] 范丽媛.探究盆底超声在女性盆底功能障碍性疾病中的应用价值[J].中国医药指南,2017,15(17):34-35.
[4] 吴海燕,尹慧,向双,等.单胎和双胎妊娠女性盆底肌形态特征的三维盆底超声观察比较[J].检验医学与临床,2017,14(09):1246-1247+1250.
[5] 周静,严稳开.盆底超声检查评价分娩方式对盆底结构与功能影响的临床研究[J].现代医学,2016,44(10):1455-1457.
[6] 陈艳,王竞宇,彭利,等.经会阴超声检查评价不同分娩方式与盆腔器官脱垂的相关性[J].西部医学,2016,28(09):1302-1305+1309.
[7] 谢琼,胡孟彩.经会阴盆底超声在宫颈癌患者子宫全切除术后盆底功能评估中的应用分析[J].山西医药杂志,2016,45(11):1277-1279.
[8] 李一冰.经会阴盆底超声评估不同分娩方式对女性盆底功能的影响分析[J].中国继续医学教育,2016,8(11):62-63.
[9] 李淑萍,李婕娜,王英红.盆底超声检查和盆底肌力评估分析不同分娩方式对女性盆底功能的影响[J].中国妇幼保健,2014,29(21):3520-3522. |
|
|
|
2019, Vol. 36 
