TURP联合超选择性前列腺动脉栓塞治疗重度BPH的临床效果

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2022.03.014

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (0)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (1128 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract 【Objective】To investigate the clinical effect of transurethral prostatectomy (TURP) combined with superselective prostate arterial embolization (PAE) in the treatment of severe benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). 【Methods】 The clinical data of 113 patients with severe BPH treated in our hospital from January 2018 to December 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. According to different surgical schemes, they were divided into observation group (treated with selective PAE combined with TURP, n=57) and control group (treated with TURP, n=56). The perioperative indexes and complications were compared between the two groups; The indexes of oxidative stress, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), urodynamic indexes [maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), residual urine volume (RUV)], quality of life (QOL score) and erectile function (IIFE-5 score) were compared between the two groups.【Results】The operation time of TURP, the indwelling time of urinary catheter, the continuous washing time of bladder, the length of hospital stay and the amount of bleeding during TURP in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in oxidative stress indexes between the two groups before operation and 1 and 5 days after TURP (P>0.05); One day after TURP, the level of serum cortisol, norepinephrine, interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-αin the two groups was higher than that before operation (P<0.05). One month after TURP, QOL,IIFE-5 scores and Qmax of the two groups were higher than those before TURP, and RUV was lower than that before TURP (P<0.05). The incidence of complications in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05).【Conclusion】TURP combined with superselective PAE has significant clinical effect in the treatment of severe BPH. It has the advantages of less intraoperative bleeding, high resection efficiency and less complications. The patients have good postoperative quality of life and erectile function.

Key words： Prostatic Hyperplasia/SU Electrosurgery Transurethral Resection of Prostate/MT Embolization, Therapeutic

Received: 07 April 2021

PACS:

R697.3

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors

Cite this article:

URL:

http://journal07.magtech.org.cn/yxlcyj/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2022.03.014 OR http://journal07.magtech.org.cn/yxlcyj/EN/Y2022/V39/I3/370

[1] 于明杰,田振涛.1470 nm激光汽化术与经尿道前列腺电切术治疗中重度良性前列腺增生的效果比较[J].广东医学,2019,40(6):849-852.
[2] 钱凡,樊彩斌.TUVP联合TURP对高龄前列腺增生患者的疗效及术后发生膀胱颈挛缩相关因素分析[J].广东医学,2019,40(11):1637-1639.
[3] 曹广劭,刘建文,刘玉岩,等.超选择性前列腺动脉栓塞术治疗良性前列腺增生临床初探[J].影像诊断与介入放射学,2017,26(2):130-135.
[4] LLOYD G L,MARKS J M,RICKE W A.Benign prostatic hyperplasia and lower urinary tract symptoms: what is the role and significance of inflammation[J].Curr Urol Rep,2019,20(9):54.
[5] 黄鹏.改良HoLEP术式与TURP术式对良性前列腺增生患者术后性功能和生活质量的影响研究[J].国际泌尿系统杂志,2019,39(1):84-87.
[6] 杨文俊,谢克基,汤平,等.经尿道前列腺电切与开放前列腺切除术治疗高危大体积良性前列腺增生的效果比较[J].广东医学,2018,39(6):878-881.
[7] MANOV J J,MOHAN P P,KAVA B,et al.Benign prostatic hyperplasia: a brief overview of pathogenesis,diagnosis,and current state of therapy[J].Tech VascInterv Radiol,2020,23(3):100687.
[8] 王文祥,李雷,李海,等.两种术式治疗较大体积良性前列腺增生的临床比较[J].微创泌尿外科杂志,2019,8(3):200-204.
[9] 张志涛,王杰,武旗.1470 nm半导体激光汽化术与经尿道前列腺电切术后的炎症及应激反应程度比较[J].海南医学院学报,2018,24(3):349-352.
[10] 苏运强,王杨.经尿道双极等离子前列腺剜除术对前列腺增生患者尿流动力学、血清 IL-6、CRP 水平的影响[J].医学综述,2017,23(3):565-568.
[11] RAY A F,POWELL J,SPEAKMAN M J,et al.Efficacy and safety of prostate artery embolization for benign prostatic hyperplasia: an observational study and propensity-matched comparison with transurethral resection of the prostate(the UK-ROPE study)[J].BJU Int,2018,122(2):270-282.