Abstract【Objective】To compare the clinical effects of improved disposable circumcision suture device and disposable circumcision suture device in circumcision. 【Methods】A total of 108 patients with long prepuce or phimosis from March to August 2018 were randomly divided into two groups. Patients in the observation group (n=56) received improved-disposable circumcision suture device, while patients in the control group (n=52) received disposable circumcision suture device. Operation time, intraoperative bleeding, number of cases of transfer surgery, postoperative pain, postoperative edema, postoperative nailing time, postoperative second operation, and postoperative satisfaction were compared between the two groups with different kinds of disposable circumcision suture devices. 【Results】There were no significant differences (P>0.05) in operation time (P=0.057), intraoperative transition to open (P=0.558), second operation (P=0.481), postoperative pain (P=0.27), or postoperative satisfaction (P=0.856). There were statistically significant differences (P<0.05) in intraoperative bleeding (P<0.001), postoperative edema (P<0.001), and postoperative nailing time. Intraoperative bleeding of the improved disposable circumcision suture device with silicone ring was better than that of the disposable circumcision suture device; the possibility of changing operation was less than the control group. At the same time, the postoperative edema was more obvious than the control group. The postoperative nailing time in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference of postoperative satisfaction between the two groups (P>0.05). 【Conclusion】Both kinds of disposable circumcision suture devices have their own advantages and disadvantages. Clinicians should choose suitable suture device according to their own experience and patient's condition.
2020, Vol. 37 
