|
|
Effect of Preoperative Paravertebral Block Combined with Intravenous Analgesia on Perioperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Thoracoscopic Lobectomy |
WANG Zhao-jun, SHANG You |
The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou 121004, Liaoning |
|
|
Abstract 【Objective】 To investigate the effect of preoperative paravertebral block (TPVB) combined with intravenous analgesia on perioperative analgesia in patients undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy.【Methods】 From September 2019 to April 2020, 99 patients with elective thoracoscopic lobectomy in our hospital were selected and randomly divided into group A (n=33), group B (n=33) and group C (n=33). The group A was given patient-controlled intravenous analgesia; group B was given single and double-point TPVB before induction; group C was placed with ultrasound-guided paravertebral catheter before induction, and continuous TPVB was used for postoperative analgesia. The VAS and sedation scores at 1 h (T0), 4 h (T1), 24 h (T2) and 48 h (T3) of the three groups were recorded; the dosage of propofol, sevoflurane and sufentanil during the operation was recorded; the times of pressing, the times of pain relief, recovery time, extubation time and adverse reactions were recorded. 【Results】 The VAS score of the group B and the group C was lower than that of the group A at T0, T1, T2 and T3, and that of the group C was lower than that of the group B (all P<0.05). The sedation score of the group B and the group C was higher than that of the group A (P<0.05); there was no significant difference between the group B and the group C (P>0.05). The times of pressing and the times of pain relief in the group B and the group C were lower than those in the group A (P<0.05); there was no significant difference between the group B and the group C (P>0.05). The intraoperative dosage of propofol, sevoflurane and sufentanil in the group B and C was lower than that in the group A (P<0.05), and the recovery time and extubation time in the group B and C were shorter than those in the group A (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between groups B and C (P>0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions was 30.30% (10 / 33) in the group A, 21.21% (7 / 33) in the group B and 15.15% (5 / 33) in the group C. There was no significant difference among the three groups (P>0.05).【Conclusion】 The effect of continuous TPVB combined with intravenous analgesia by paravertebral catheterization and ultrasound-guided single and double point TPVB in patients undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy is superior to patient-controlled intravenous analgesia in reducing the dosage of propofol, sevoflurane and sufentanil, but the effect of TPVB combined with intravenous analgesia is better than that of single and double point TPVB, and TPVB combined with intravenous analgesia does not increase the incidence of postoperative adverse reactions.
|
Received: 31 July 2020
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 边悦,卢静,刘中凯, 等.超声引导下椎旁神经阻滞与竖脊肌平面阻滞在胸腔镜肺叶切除术中的镇痛效果对比[J].山东医药,2019,59(13):62-64. [2] 刘洁,韩俊杰,李肖辉, 等.罗哌卡因及布比卡因经超声引导对腋路臂丛神经阻滞患者麻醉效果的研究[J].中国临床实用医学,2020,11(2):33-36. [3] 王忠义,苗国瑞,王福朝, 等.地佐辛复合罗哌卡因胸椎旁神经阻滞在胸科手术中的应用[J].河北医药,2020,42(8):1217-1219,1223. [4] 庄慧芳,庄艳芳,徐海燕, 等.肋间神经阻滞对单肺叶切除的非小细胞肺癌患者术后疼痛及应激反应指标的影响[J].癌症进展,2019,17(10):1201-1204. [5] 罗太君,高广阔,李坤, 等.不同胸椎旁神经阻滞方式在胸腔镜肺叶切除术围术期镇痛效果比较[J].临床肺科杂志,2019,24(7):1188-1192. [6] 胡礼宏,徐霞,沈韦羽,等.胸腔镜下胸椎旁阻滞在单孔胸腔镜肺叶切除术镇痛中的应用[J].中华医学杂志,2020,100(33):2596-2600. [7] 赵尧平,陶岩,蔡楠,等.超声引导下椎板阻滞对胸腔镜下肺叶切除术术后镇痛的影响[J].国际麻醉学与复苏杂志,2020,41(2):173-176. [8] 赵志海,钱大东,古淼,等.全身麻醉复合胸椎旁阻滞在胸腔镜肺叶切除术中的应用[J].检验医学与临床,2019,16(1):94-97. [9] 张博,刘丹彦.胸椎旁神经阻滞在胸腔镜肺叶切除术中的应用:随机对照试验[J].南方医科大学学报,2017,37(4):460-464. [10] 赵姝,张海光.异丙酚复合瑞芬太尼联合超声引导下胸椎旁神经阻滞在老年肺癌改良根治术中的应用效果[J].重庆医学,2020,49(14):2351-2354. |
|
|
|