医学临床研究
   Apr. 5, 2025    Home  |  About Journal  |  Editorial Board  |  Instruction  |  Subscribe  |  Advertisement  |  Messages Board  |  Contact Us  |  中文
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RESEARCH  2024, Vol. 41 Issue (10): 1571-1574    DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2024.10.033
Original Articles Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Application Value of Deep Learning-based AI Software in CT Diagnosis of Fresh Rib Fractures
LYU Dan, GAO Kaibo, DENG Shijie, et al
No.921 Hospital of Joint Logistics Unit,Changsha Hunan 410003
Download: PDF (1557 KB)   HTML (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  【Objective】 To explore the application value of deep learning-based artificial intelligence (AI) software in the diagnosis of CT of fresh rib fractures.【Methods】A total of 259 qualified fresh fracture patients admitted to our hospital from June 2022 to September 2023 were selected and their imaging data were introduced to the AI workstation; Based on a 8-year attending physician in the department of radiology and AI software to diagnose rib fractures, the group A was diagnosed separately by AI software, and the group B and the group AB were diagnosed by physician combined with AI software. The number, site, and classification of fracture lesions were recorded in the three groups; The results of the three groups were analyzed with the reference standard to compare the sensitivity, misdiagnosis rate and detection rate of incomplete fractures in the three groups; Mean time of diagnosis was compared between the groups B and the group AB. 【Results】There were 563 fractures in 259 patients; There were 385 complete fractures and 178 incomplete fractures. The sensitivity of fracture detection in the group A, the group B and the group AB was 91.47%, 83.13%, and 92.54%, respectively. The sensitivity comparison of the three groups showed statistically significant differences (P<0.05).The sensitivity of fractures in the group A and the group AB was higher than that in the group B, significant (P<0.05). The misdiagnosis rates in the group A, the group B and the group AB were 20.03%, 13.17% and 12.58%, respectively, which was statistically significant (P<0.05).The group A had the highest misdiagnosis rate, significantly higher than that of the group AB and the group B, with a statistically significant difference (all P<0.05). The detection rate of incomplete fractures in the group A, the group B and the group AB was 75.28%, 50.56% and 76.40%, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).The mean diagnosis time in the group AB was shorter than that of the group B , with significant difference(P<0.05).【Conclusion】The joint diagnosis between doctors and AI improves the sensitivity of the detection of fresh rib fractures, which is mainly reflected in the detection rate of incomplete fractures, and can also significantly shorten the diagnosis time and improve the work efficiency.
Key wordsRib Fractures/DG      Tomography, Spiral Computed      Artificial Intelligence     
Received: 10 January 2024     
PACS:  R655  
Service
E-mail this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Cite this article:   
URL:  
http://journal07.magtech.org.cn/yxlcyj/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2024.10.033     OR     http://journal07.magtech.org.cn/yxlcyj/EN/Y2024/V41/I10/1571
Copyright © Editorial Board of JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RESEARCH
Supported by:Beijing Magtech