改良盾构术即刻种植对上颌前牙区唇侧骨量、牙周组织及美学效果的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2022.09.020

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (1172 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract 【Objective】 To investigate the effect of modified shield tunneling (modified SST) immediate implantation on the bone mass, periodontal tissue and aesthetic effect of the labial maxillary anterior teeth. 【Methods】 From November 2016 to November 2021, 120 patients with immediate implant repair of a single tooth in the maxillary anterior tooth area who were treated in Ankang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine were selected as the study objects, of which 60 patients were treated with traditional immediate implant as the control group, and 60 patients were treated with modified SST as the observation group. After 12 months of follow-up, the implant success rate, bone absorption at the lip side of the implant, and periodontal tissue around the implant were compared between the two groups [Including modified gingival sulcus bleeding index, periodontal probing depth, gingival papilla index, red aesthetic index (PES)].The incidence of adverse reactions of all patients was counted.【Results】The successful rate of implantation was 100% in both groups. The improved gingival sulcus bleeding index in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). At 6 months and 12 months after repair, there was no significant difference in the improved gingival sulcus bleeding index between the two groups (P>0.05); The gingival papilla index of the observation group was higher than that of the control group at 6 months and 12 months after repair (P<0.05). Lip bone resorption in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group 6 months after repair and 12 months after repair (P<0.05). Lip bone absorption was higher in both groups 12 months after repair than in 6 months after repair. The bone resorption at the lip side of the patients in the observation group was lower than that in the control group 6 months and 12 months after the repair (P<0.05). The PES scores of the two groups increased 6 and 12 months after repair, and the scores of the observation group were higher than those of the control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reaction between the two groups (P>0.05). 【Conclusion】 The modified SST immediate implantation has a positive effect on maintaining the bone mass of the lip, and can obtain better soft tissue aesthetic effect with high safety.

Key words： Maxilla Periodontium Tooth Loss/TH Dental Prosthesis Dental Implants

Received: 15 March 2022

PACS:

R782

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	ZOU Jing
	DING Li

Cite this article:

ZOU Jing,DING Li. Effect of Immediate Implantation with Modified Shield Tunneling on the Bone Mass, Periodontal Tissue and Aesthetic Effect of the Upper Anterior Teeth[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 39(9): 1353-1355.

URL:

http://journal07.magtech.org.cn/yxlcyj/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2022.09.020 OR http://journal07.magtech.org.cn/yxlcyj/EN/Y2022/V39/I9/1353

[1] 朱艳艳,郭威,刘红霞.即刻种植与早期种植对上颌前牙缺失患者软组织美学效果的影响比较[J].中国医疗美容 2020,10(3):68-71.
[2] 谢新礼,郝利霞.无牙颌即刻种植修复与延期种植修复疗效及满意度的对比研究[J].云南医药,2020,41(1):49-51.
[3] OGAWA T,SITALAKSMI R M,MIYASHITA M,et al.Effectiveness of the socket shield technique in dental implant:a systematic review[J].J Prosthodont Res,202,9(330):1-9.
[4] 邵建婷,林丽婷,李翠君,等.分析流程化系统护理对口腔种植患者种植成功率及护患关系的作用评价[J].实用临床护理学电子杂志,2020,5(30):89-93.
[5] 谢也斯.牙周炎罹患程度对种植修复体周围组织健康状况的影响[J].中日友好医院学报,2020,34(3):149-152.
[6] 陆春露,王佐林.美学区单个种植义齿龈乳头高度的影响因素分析[J].口腔颌面外科杂志,2013,23(4):284-289.
[7] SILVA R L B,DUAILIBI N E F,TODESCAN F F,et al.Evaluation of cervical peri-implant optical density in longitudinal control of immediate implants in the anterior maxilla region[J].Dentomaxillo Rad,2020,49(6):396-403.
[8] SUKSOD N,KUNAVISARUT C,KITISUBKANCHANA J.Accuracy of computer-guided implantation in the placement of one-piece ceramic dental implants in the anterior region:A prospective clinical study[J].PLoS One,2020,15(9):e023722-e023726.
[9] KAN J Y,RUNGCHARASSAENG K.Proximal socket shield forinterimplant papilla preservation in the esthetic zone[J].Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent,2013,33(1):e24-e31.
[10] SONG X,LI L,GOU H,et al.Impact of implant location on the prevalence of peri-implantitis:A systematic review and meta-analysis[J].J Dent,2020,103(86):103490-103495.
[11] TOPRAK M E,ATAÇ M S.Maxillary sinus septa and anatomical correlation with the dentition type of sinus region:a cone beam computed tomographic study[J].Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2021,59(4):419-424.
[12] LEE C T,CHIU T S,CHUANG S K,et al.Alterations of the bonedimension following immediate implant placement intoextraction socket:systematic review and meta-analysis[J].J Clin Periodontol,2014,41(9):914-926.

[1]	. [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 39(8): 1251-1253.