经皮前方螺钉内固定及后外侧入路螺钉内固定治疗三踝骨折临床疗效比较

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2021.11.022

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (0)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (1164 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract 【Objective】To compare the clinical effects of percutaneous anterior screw internal fixation and posterolateral approach screw internal fixation in the treatment of three ankle fractures. 【Methods】 A retrospective analysis of the clinical data of 92 patients with three ankle fractures admitted to our hospital from January 2017 to January 2020. According to the different treatment methods. Patients were divided into group A (45 cases) treated with percutaneous anterior screw internal fixation and group B (47 cases) treated with posterolateral screw internal fixation. The operation time, number of fluoroscopy, intraoperative blood loss, 1year postoperative ankle range of motion (ROM), imaging examination results, full weight bearing time, fracture healing time, and ankle-hindfoot function score at different moments evaluated by the American Association of Foot and Ankle Surgery (AOFAS) were compared between the two groups.. 【Results】There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups of patients in operation time, time to complete weight bearing, fracture healing time, AOFAS ankle-hindfoot function score, ankle dorsiflexion, plantar flexion, varus and valgus ROM at 1 year after surgery (P>0.05). Compared to the AOFAS score at 3 months after operation, the AOFAS ankle-hindfoot function scores increased in both groups at 6 months and 12 months after operation (P<0.05). The number of fluoroscopy in group A was more than that in group B (P<0.05), and the amount of intraoperative blood loss was lower than that in group B (P<0.05). The incidence of poor reduction/poor fixation in group A was higher than that in group B (P<0.05). One year after the operation, there was no loss of fracture reduction, loose internal fixation and narrow ankle joint space in both groups. 【Conclusion】Both percutaneous anterior screw internal fixation and posterolateral approach screw internal fixation can effectively treat three ankle fractures. The former has more fluoroscopy treatments than the latter and the intraoperative blood loss is lower than the latter, but the quality of internal fixation is superior to the latter.

Key words： FRACTURES/SU Ankle Injuries/SU Fracture Fixation, Internal/MT

Received: 07 September 2021

PACS:

R684.7

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	LI You-ping
	SHU Jun-feng

Cite this article:

LI You-ping,SHU Jun-feng. Clinical Comparative Study of Percutaneous Anterior Screw Internal Fixation and Posterolateral Approach Screw Internal Fixation in the Treatment of Three Ankle Fractures[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 38(11): 1680-1682.

URL:

http://journal07.magtech.org.cn/yxlcyj/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2021.11.022 OR http://journal07.magtech.org.cn/yxlcyj/EN/Y2021/V38/I11/1680

[1] BRIET J P, HIETBRINK F, SMEEING D P, et al. Ankle fracture classification: an innovative system for describing ankle fractures[J].J Foot Ankle Surg,2019,58(3):492-496.
[2] 缪小兵. 内外侧入路结合腓骨远端锁定板空心钉治疗三踝骨折[J].临床骨科杂志, 2020, 23(6):133-135.
[3] BLOM R P, MEIJER D T, DE MUINCK K R, et al. Posterior malleolar fracture morphology determines outcome in rotational type ankle fractures[J].Injury,2019,50(7):1392-1397.
[4] 姚鹏飞, 李强, 董斌,等. 改良后内侧入路在治疗三踝骨折中的临床应用[J].创伤外科杂志, 2020, 22(1):62-64.
[5] 王志焘. 改良前外侧入路联合改良后内侧入路治疗三踝骨折疗效的病例对照研究[J].中国骨伤, 2019, 32(11):1014-1020.
[6] 中华医学会. 临床诊疗指南:骨科分册[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社, 2009:65-68.
[7] SOOHOO N F, VYAS R, SAMIMI D. Responsiveness of the foot function index, AOFAS clinical rating systems, and SF-36 after foot and ankle surgery[J].Foot Ankle Int,2006,27(11):930-934.
[8] 周军杰, 俞光荣, 曹成福, 等.距下关节融合对中后足周围关节活动度影响的生物力学实验研究[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志, 2007,22(2):125-127.
[9] 官蓉威, 钟喜红, 程劲, 等. 两种不同手术入路治疗三踝骨折的临床疗效[J].检验医学与临床, 2018, 15(007):946-948.
[10] LARSEN P, RATHLEFF M S, ELSOE R. Surgical versus conservative treatment for ankle fractures in adults -A systematic review and meta-analysis of the benefits and harms[J].Foot Ankle Surg,2019,25(4):409-417.
[11] VETTER S Y, BEISEMANN N, KEIL H, et al. Comparison of three different reduction methods of the ankle mortise in unstable syndesmotic injuries[J].Sci Rep,2019,9(1):15445.
[12] VERHAGE S M, HOOGENDOORN J M, KRIJNEN P, et al. When and how to operate the posterior malleolus fragment in trimalleolar fractures: a systematic literature review[J].Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,2018,138(9):1213-1222.
[13] MARZOUKI A, SOUMARE B, DIARRA A S, et al. Surgical treatment by percutaneous anterior screw fixation of scaphoid fractures[J].Hand Surg Rehabil,2018,37(2):91-94.
[14] GUPTA S, VIRK J S, MALHOTRA A, et al. Fragment-specific fixation of trimalleolar fractures utilizing the posterolateral approach: A preliminary experience[J].J Orthop Surg,2019,27(2):615502577.
[15] 林增平, 钟继平, 聂达荣. 外踝及内踝双切口在三踝骨折内固定术中的应用[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志, 2018, 33(6):643-644.
[16] 许桦, 陈世昌, 翟利锋, 等. 由前向后与由后向前置入拉力螺钉治疗后踝骨折的对比[J].中国矫形外科杂志, 2020, 484(2):64-68.