|
|
Influences of Postures on Curative Effect and Functional Recovery in Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation with Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy |
DANG Jing-dong, WANG Lei-jie, YE Lin-jiang, et al |
Department of Pain, Yulin Rehabilitation Hospital of Neck-Shoulder and Lumbocrural Pain, Yulin, Shaanxi 719000 |
|
|
Abstract 【Objective】To explore influences of different postures on the curative effect and functional recovery in treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH)with percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) . 【Methods】A total of 80 LDH patients who were treated in Yulin Rehabilitation Hospital of Neck-Shoulder and Lumbocrural Pain from January 2017 to December 2018 were enrolled. They were divided into the control group and the observation group by random number table method, with 40 cases in each group. The control group underwent PTED in prone position, while the observation group underwent PTED in lateral position. The clinical curative effect after 1 year of surgery, intraoperative puncture time, times of fluoroscopy, number of cases with extreme discomfort, scores of visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry disability Index (ODI) and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) after 3 months and 1 year of surgery, and incidence of complications within 3 months after surgery were compared between the two groups. 【Results】After 12 months of surgery, there was no significant difference in good rate of treatment between the observation group and the control group (92.50% vs 87.50%) (P>0.05). During surgery, puncture time, times of fluoroscopy and number of cases with extreme discomfort in the observation group were lower than those in control group (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in scores of VAS of lumbar and leg pain, ODI and JOA before surgery between the two groups (P>0.05). At 3 months and 1 year after surgery, scores of lumbar and leg pain, and ODI in both groups were lower than those before surgery (P<0.05), while JOA scores were higher than those before surgery (P<0.05). Within 3 months after surgery, there was no significant difference in incidence of complications between the observation group and the control group (7.50% vs 10.00%) (P>0.05). 【Conclusion】The curative effect of PTED in both postures is good on LDH patients, which both can effectively improve lumbar function and alleviate lumbar and leg pain. The lateral position can reduce intraoperative puncture time and times of fluoroscopy, which showed more comfortable.
|
Received: 19 May 2020
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 赵青,许建,代静.针刀联合超短波治疗腰椎间盘突出疗效观察[J].医学临床研究,2020,37(1):138-141.
[2] 刘磊,李业成,刘守正,等.经皮椎间孔镜下椎板间入路治疗单节段腰椎间盘突出症的疗效分析[J].中国微创外科杂志,2019,19(7):610-613.
[3] 邓信昌,梁晓,王楚,等.椎间孔镜下不同手术入路治疗腰椎间盘突出症的效果比较[J].广东医学,2019,40(11):1621-1624.
[4] 许立臣,许卫兵,杨东方,等.俯卧位和侧卧位下经皮椎间孔镜摘除椎间盘治疗老年退行性腰椎间盘突出症:随机对照临床试验方案及预试验结果[J].中国组织工程研究,2018,22(23):3698-3702.
[5] 胡有谷.腰椎间盘突出症[M].第4版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2011:231.
[6] 余晓杰,蒙思锋,唐光伟,等.经皮椎间孔镜治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床观察[J].陕西医学杂志,2017,46(1):75-77.
[7] 柳百炼,熊鹰,顾邵,等.经皮椎间孔镜治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床效果[J].实用医学杂志,2015,41(6):981-983.
[8] 项廷淼,殷世武,潘升权,等.数字减影血管造影机引导下经皮椎间孔镜治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效观察[J].安徽医药,2018,22(4):652-655.
[9] 符祖昶,王清铿,尤瑞金,等.经皮椎间孔镜治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床效果[J].中国医药导报,2017,14(18):80-83.
[10] 万建杉,孙嵘,黄合飞,等.侧卧位经皮椎间孔镜手术治疗腰椎间盘突出症[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2019,34(3):274-275.
[11] 潘承波,刘法银,李嗣生.经皮椎间孔镜治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效观察[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2015,30(1):94-95.
[12] 蔡进奎,李章华,方卫军,等.经皮椎间孔镜技术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效分析[J].安徽医药,2018,22(1):46-49.
[13] 王翀,姜飞,宋兴华,等.经皮椎间孔镜TESSYS技术与开放手术治疗腰椎间盘突出症疗效及安全性比较[J].新疆医科大学学报,2017,40(10):1288-1292.
[14] 徐杏平,程继伟,樊孝江,等.侧卧位与俯卧位椎间盘切除术治疗老年腰椎间盘突出症的对比研究[J].医学临床研究,2016,33(6):1107-1111.
[15] 张海斌,许卫兵,许立臣.俯卧位与侧卧位下PELD治疗L5S1节段3、4区腰椎间盘突出症的比较[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2017,32(11):1187-1188.
[16] 罗旺,王兵,陈凌强,等.经皮椎间孔镜微创手术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效分析[J].西部医学,2018,30(3):400-408.
[17] 楚磊,晏铮剑,陈亮,等.不同体位下经皮椎间孔镜手术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的比较[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2011,21(2):166-167. |
[1] |
. [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RESEARCH, 2020, 37(8): 1264-1266. |
|
|
|
|