临床症状、治疗方法等认知水平对STEMI患者急诊PCI决策的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2026.02.012

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (1196 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract 【Objective】 To explore the influence of cognitive level of clinical symptoms, treatment methods and other related knowledge on the decision-making of emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction(STEMI). 【Methods】 A total of 195 inpatients with STEMI admitted to our department from July 2021 to July 2022 were selected. According to whether emergency PCI was performed, the patients were divided into the emergency PCI group (n=68) and the non-emergency PCI group (n=127). The awareness of main clinical symptoms of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), first reaction when AMI occurred and treatment methods was compared between the two groups. 【Results】 The proportion of receiving health education in the emergency PCI group was significantly higher than that in the non-emergency PCI group, and the proportion of pre-hospital treatment delay was significantly lower than that in the non-emergency PCI group, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). The proportion of patients in the emergency PCI group who knew that sudden chest pain or discomfort, sudden shortness of breath or dyspnea were the onset symptoms of AMI was significantly higher than that in the non-emergency PCI group, with a statistically significant difference (P<0.05). The proportions of patients in the emergency PCI group whose first reaction to AMI was to call 120 emergency ambulance and contact the nearest community hospital for advice were significantly higher than those in the non-emergency PCI group, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). The proportion of patients in the emergency PCI group who knew that PCI was a treatment method for AMI was significantly higher than that in the non-emergency PCI group, and the proportion of those who did not know the treatment method for AMI was significantly lower than that in the non-emergency PCI group, with a statistically significant difference (P<0.05). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that knowing the symptom of sudden shortness of breath or dyspnea when AMI occurs, knowing PCI, as well as the first reaction of calling 120 emergency ambulance and contacting doctors of the nearest hospital for advice when symptoms occur were independent protective factors for AMI patients to make emergency PCI decisions (P<0.05).【Conclusion】 The proportion of STEMI patients receiving emergency PCI is too low. The cognitive level of main clinical symptoms of AMI, first reaction when AMI occurs and treatment methods significantly affects the emergency PCI decision-making of STEMI patients.

Key words： ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Myocardial Infarction Acute Disease Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Received: 22 June 2025

PACS:

R542.22

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	PENG Nanying
	LIU Qin
	JIN Zhao
	XU WeiFang
	OU YaLi
	YU Guolong

Cite this article:

PENG Nanying,LIU Qin,JIN Zhao, et al. Influence of Cognitive Level of Clinical Symptoms, Treatment Methods and Other Related Knowledge on Emergency PCI Decision-Making in STEMI Patients[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RESEARCH, 2026, 43(2): 219-223.

URL:

http://journal07.magtech.org.cn/yxlcyj/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2026.02.012 OR http://journal07.magtech.org.cn/yxlcyj/EN/Y2026/V43/I2/219

[1] LAWTON J, TAMIS-HOLLAND J, BANGALORE S, et al.2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI guideline for coronary artery revascularization: a report of the american college of cardiology/american heart association joint committee on clinical practice guidelines[J].Circulation,2022, 145(3): e18-e114.
[2] 中华医学会心血管病学分会,中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会.中国经皮冠状动脉介入治疗指南(2025)[J].中华心血管病杂志,2025,7(53):16-44.
[3] 霍勇. 权威发布:数据“说”冠心病介入治疗[J].实用心脑肺血管病杂志,2021,29(6):前插4.
[4] MOSER D, KIMBLE L, ALBERTS M, et al. Reducing delay in seeking treatment by patients with acute coronary syndrome and stroke: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on cardiovascular nursing and stroke council[J].Circulation,2006, 114(2): 168-182.
[5] ERICSSON M, THYLÉN I, STRÖMBERG A, et al. Factors associated with patient decision time in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, in early and late responders-an observational cross-sectional survey study[J].Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs,2022,21(7):694-701.
[6] 王俊岭,曹雪滨,毛继康,等.急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者行急诊介入治疗延误的原因分析[J].中国循证心血管医学杂志,2015,7(3):404-406.
[7] 王万虹,张荣林,高千,等.经济欠发达地区急诊PCI治疗急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的D2B时间延误分析[J].东南大学学报(医学版),2012,31(6):739-742.
[8] 中华医学会心血管专业委员会, 中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会. 急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死诊断和治疗指南(2019)[J].中华心血管病杂志,2019,47(10):766-783.
[9] YAMAGUCHI J, MATOBA T, KIKUCHI M, et al. Effects of door-in to door-out time on mortality among ST-Segment elevation myocardial infarction patients transferred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention-systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Circ Rep,2022,4(3):109-115.
[10] NGUYEN H, SACZYNSKI J, GORE J, et al. Age and sex differences in duration of prehospital delay in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review [J].Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes,2010, 3(1): 82-92.
[11] DUBER H, MCNELLAN C, WOLLUM A, et al. Public knowledge of cardiovascular disease and response to acute cardiac events in three cities in China and India[J].Heart,2018, 104(1): 67.
[12] SMITH K, CAMERON P, MEYER A, et al. Knowledge of heart attack symptoms in a community survey of Victoria[J].Emerg Med(Fremantle),2002, 14(3): 255-260.
[13] 毛怡君,范惠,李尔清,等.急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死病人症状群的影响因素及救治时效性的研究[J].中西医结合心脑血管病杂志,2025,23(9):1366-1371.
[14] GADELEY R, ARNOLD R, AMOS D, et al. Rural and remote acute STEMI diagnosis and management: current status and future directions[J].Heart Lung Circ,2025,34(12):1332-1343.

[1]	. [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RESEARCH, 2026, 43(2): 317-319.