|
|
Value of HIF-1a Combined with UA/MCA, RA/MCA and VSCR for Fetal Distress Diagnosis |
CAO Shuo, MA Zheng-ge, WANG Yuan-Yuan, et al |
Baoding First Central Hospital, Department of Ultrasound, Baoding Hebei, 071000 |
|
|
Abstract 【Objective】To investigate the diagnostic value of hypoxia-inducible factor-1a (HIF-1a) combined with the ratio of umbilical artery/middle cerebral artery (UA/MCA), ratio of renal artery/middle cerebral artery (RA/MCA)and venous catheter shunt rate (VCSR) in intrauterine distress. 【Methods】A total of 50 pregnant women with intrauterine distress received treatment in our hospital from January 2016 to May 2018 were selected as the observation group, while in the same period 60 normal pregnant women with birth examination were enrolled as the control group. All pregnant women took blood test to measure HIF-1a and received color Doppler ultrasound detection for fetal umbilical artery (UA), renal artery (RA) and middle cerebral artery (MCA). The maximum systolic flow rate/maximum diastolic flow rate (S/D)of MCA, the resistance index (RI), the pulse index (PI) and venous catheter shunt rate (VCSR) were calculated and compared between the two groups. 【Results】The detection value of maternal blood HIF-1a in observation group was higher than that in normal control group; The difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).The resistance ratio (S/D) of MCA and UA (MCA/UA), RI and PI in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). Fetal RA and MCA resistance ratio of RA/MCA S/D, RI and PI in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group; The differences were statistically significant (P<0.05).The venous catheter shunt rate (VSCR) in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group. The difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).The fetal distress diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and the correct diagnosis rate of HIF-1a in combination with MCA/UA,RA/MCA and VCSR were significantly better than HIF-1a, MCA/UA, RA/MCA, VCSR alone. The differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). 【Conclusion】Maternal blood HIF-1a in combination with MCA/UA,RA/MCA and VCSR has higher diagnostic value for intrauterine distress which can provide timely clinical monitoring and intervention.
|
Received: 06 November 2018
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 龚逞英. 胎心监护联合肾动脉、大脑中动脉及静脉导管分流率预测胎儿宫内窘迫的临床分析[J].中国当代医药,2014,21(26):69-71. [2] 曹缵孙,苟文丽.现代围产医学[J].北京:人民卫生出版社,2000:466. [3] 李建玲,韩华,吴焕卿,等. 胎心监护联合脐动脉、大脑中动脉及静脉导管分流率预测胎儿宫内窘迫的价值[J].中国实用医刊,2014,41(9):29-31. [4] 肖青,彭娟. HIF-1α在重度子痫前期孕妇胎盘中的表达及与胎儿肾动脉血流的相关性[J].中国妇幼保健,2018,33(1):16-18. [5] 李建华,刘姿,林珏瑛,等. 子痫前期胎儿静脉导管、脐静脉和脐动脉及大脑中动脉血流检测对围生儿预后的预测分析[J].临床超声医学杂志,2016,18(2):85-88. [6] 刘美冰. 大脑中、脐动脉及静脉导管彩超检查在胎儿窘迫诊断中的应用价值分析[J].现代诊断与治疗,2015,26(20):4660-4661. [7] 侯超,李明星. 肾动脉血流动力学参数在子痫前期的检测价值[J].中国超声医学杂志,2018,34(5):445-448. [8] 吴静,赵凯英,林玉涓,等.胎儿脐动脉和大脑中动脉及脐静脉导管血流阻力指标对妊高症患者胎儿宫内窘迫的预测价值〔J〕.广东医学,2013,34(16):2551-2553. [9] Baschat AA,Cosmi E , Bilardo CM,et al.Predictors of neonatal outcome in early-onset placental dysfunction〔J〕.Obster Gynecol,2007 ,109 (2 Pt 1):253-261. [10] 蔡燕 刘一勤. 孕妇血雌三醇、胎心电子监护及超声脐动脉血流S/D比值检查预测胎儿窘迫的临床价值分析[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2018,17(2):196-200. |
|
|
|