Abstract：【Objective】To explore the predictive value of pelvic ultrasound measurement parameters for early pelvic floor dysfunction in primiparous women after delivery.【Methods】 Clinical data of 82 primiparous women who gave birth in Baoji Maternal and Child Health Hospital from February 2018 to February 2021 were collected. They were divided into natural delivery group (n=40) and cesarean section group (n=42) according to different delivery methods. According to whether pelvic floor dysfunction occurred within one year of production, the natural childbirth group can be divided into the dysfunction group (n=17) and the normal group (n=23); The cesarean section group can be divided into the obstructed group (n=13) and the normal group (n=29). All study subjects underwent ultrasound examination before delivery and 6-8 weeks postpartum. Pelvic ultrasound parameters such as bladder urethral posterior angle (PUA), bladder neck mobility (BND), urethral rotation angle (URA), detrusor muscle thickness (DwT), and levator ani muscle rupture area (LHA) were compared. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to analyze the predictive value of pelvic ultrasound measurement parameters for early pelvic floor dysfunction in primiparous women after delivery. 【Results】Postpartum BND, URA, DwT, resting PUA, tile PUA, resting LHA, and tile LHA were all higher in the natural delivery group and cesarean section group than before delivery (P<0.05);The BND, URA, resting LHA, and tile LHA in the postpartum disorders group after natural delivery and cesarean section were higher than those in the normal group (P<0.05); The ROC curve analysis results show that BND, URA, resting LHA, and tile LHA can be used to predict early pelvic floor dysfunction in primiparous women after natural delivery and cesarean section, with areas under the curves of 0.923, 0.872, 0.854, 0.885, and 0.936, 0.817, 0.975, and 0.916, respectively. 【Conclusion】Pelvic ultrasound parameters have high predictive value for early pelvic floor dysfunction in primiparous women after delivery, and have positive significance in preventing pelvic floor dysfunction in primiparous women after delivery.
杨晓宇, 魏世荣, 薛晓光, 邓召亮. 盆腔超声测量参数对初产妇产后发生早期盆底功能障碍的预测价值[J]. 医学临床研究, 2024, 41(2): 218-221.
YANG Xiaoyu, WEI Shirong, XUE Xiaoguang, et al. The Predictive Value of Pelvic Ultrasound Measurement Parameters for Early Pelvic Floor Dysfunction in Primiparous Women after Delivery. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RESEARCH, 2024, 41(2): 218-221.
[1] ROMEIKIENE. K E, BARTKEVICˇIENE. D. Pelvic-floor dysfunction prevention in prepartum and postpartum periods[J].Medicina (Kaunas),2021,57(4):387. [2] GHADERI F, BASTANI P, HAJEBRAHIMI S, et al. Pelvic floor rehabilitation in the treatment of women with dyspareunia: A randomized controlled clinical trial[J].Int Urogynecol J,2019,30(11):1849-1855. [3] 黄泽萍,钱佩佩,白植斌,等. 经会阴三维盆底超声评估第二产程时长对产后早期盆底功能的影响[J].中国超声医学杂志,2022,38(5):558-561. [4] 谢幸,苟文丽.妇产科学[M].8版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2013:284-290. [5] FU W Y, YUAN H, YE X Q, et al. Prediction of postpartum pelvic floor dysfunction with a nomogram model based on big data collected during pregnancy[J].Ann Palliat Med,2021,10(2):2143-2151. [6] 黄慧琨,王慧香,韦克暖,等. 盆底超声在产后早期压力性尿失禁筛查中的应用价值[J].中国基层医药,2022,29(4):554-558. [7] FEI H, LIU Y, LI M, et al. The relationship of severity in diastasis recti abdominis and pelvic floor dysfunction: A retrospective cohort study[J].BMC Womens Health,2021,21(1):68. [8] 陈禹,张春叶,王玮婧,等. 三维超声对不同孕期盆底功能障碍性疾病的诊断分析[J].影像科学与光化学,2022,40(5):1148-1152. [9] 魏薇,李文婷,陈玲,等. 超声成像参数对初产妇产后初期盆底功能障碍的意义[J].中国介入影像与治疗学,2020,17(12):732-736. [10] 周志娟,徐巧阳,卢欢欢. 盆底四维超声评估女性产后盆底结构变化的价值及相关参数分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2020,35(23):4624-4627. [11] 庄丽,李晓琴,杨敏,等. 盆底超声评估初次经阴道分娩与剖宫产产后盆底功能[J].中国介入影像与治疗学,2022,19(2):95-98. [12] 高彩霞,胡清荣,李瑾. 盆底超声检查对宫颈癌全子宫切除术后盆底功能障碍性疾病评估的研究[J].中国医学装备,2022,19(5):97-103. [13] 朱玲斐,马苏亚,陆丹尔,等. 经会阴二维超声动态观察和评估产后女性盆底功能的改变[J].中国妇幼健康研究,2018,29(11):1431-1436. [14] 王晨雨,王颍超,喻红霞. 孕晚期血清松弛素水平与产后盆底功能障碍性疾病及盆底超声参数的相关性研究[J].中华生殖与避孕杂志,2022,42(3):261-267.
2024, Vol. 41 
