医学临床研究
  2025年5月11日 星期日           首 页    |    期刊简介    |    编委会    |    投稿指南    |    期刊订阅    |    广告合作    |    留言板    |    联系我们    |    English
医学临床研究  2023, Vol. 40 Issue (8): 1172-1175    DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2023.08.015
  论著 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
不同修复材料对前牙PFM修复患者GCF中炎症、破骨细胞调节因子的影响
马庆云1, 李会斌2, 段风1, 张文涛3*
1.陕西中医药大学第二附属医院口腔科,陕西 咸阳 712000;
2.咸阳市秦都区小白兔口腔门诊部,陕西 咸阳 712000;
3.西安高新医院口腔科,陕西 西安 710075
Effects of Different Restoration Materials on Inflammation and Osteoclastic Cytokines of GCF in Anterior Teeth PFM Restoration Patients
MA Qing-yun, LI Hui-bin, DUAN Feng, et al
Department of Stomatology,the Second Affiliated Hospital of Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine,Xianyang Shaanxi 712000
全文: PDF (1547 KB)   HTML (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 【目的】探讨不同修复材料对前牙烤瓷熔附金属全冠(PFM)修复患者龈沟液(GCF)中炎症因子、破骨细胞调节因子的影响。【方法】选择陕西中医药大学第二附属医院2019年6月至2022年6月收治的180例前牙PFM修复患者,按照随机数字表法分为A组(使用镍铬合金材料修复)、B组(使用钴铬合金材料修复)、C组(使用金沉积材料修复),每组60例。比较三组患者修复前后牙龈情况、GCF中炎症因子水平和破骨细胞调节因子水平以及修复体完整率。【结果】修复后,三组GCF量、龈沟探诊深度(GCD)均高于修复前,牙龈指数(GI)评分低于修复前(P<0.05);修复后,A组上述指标高于B组、C组(P<0.05),但B组、C组上述指标比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。修复后,三组GCF中炎症因子水平均高于修复前(P<0.05);修复后,A组GCF炎症因子水平高于B组、C组(P<0.05),但B组、C组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。修复后,三组细胞核因子κB受体活化因子配体(RANKL)水平、RANKL/骨保护素(OPG)均高于修复前,OPG低于修复前(P<0.05);修复后,A组RANKL、RANKL/骨保护素(OPG)高于B组、C组,OPG低于B组、C组(P<0.05),但B组、C组上述指标比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);三组修复体完整率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。【结论】与镍铬合金材料修复相比,PFM修复中使用钴铬合金材料修复、金沉积材料修复患者炎症因子水平更低,对破骨细胞的影响更小,生物相容性与修复后的牙体稳定性更高,推荐临床选择。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
马庆云
李会斌
段风
张文涛
关键词 牙科材料金属烤瓷合金牙龈缝液RANK配体    
Abstract:【Objective】To compare the effects of different restoration materials on inflammation and osteoclastic cytokines in gingival sulcus fluid (GCF) in patients with anterior tooth porcelain fused metal (PFM) full crown restoration. 【Methods】A total of 180 patients with anterior tooth PFM restoration admitted to the Second Affiliated Hospital of Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine from June 2019 to June 2022 were randomly divided into three groups:Group A(n=60),Group B(n=60),and Group C(n=60). Group A was remediated using nickel-chromium materials,Group B was remediated using cobalt-chromium materials,and Group C was remediated using gold deposited materials. The gum condition,GCF inflammatory factor level,GCF osteoclastic regulator level and restoration integrity rate before and after repair were compared between the three groups. 【Results】After restoration,the GCF volume and gingival groove exploration depth (GCD) were higher than those before restoration,while the gingival index (GI) was lower than that before restoration (P<0.05). After restoration,the above indexes in group A were higher than those in groups B and C (P<0.05),but there was no significant difference between group B and group C (P>0.05). Levels of inflammatory factors in GCF of the three groups after restoration were higher than those before restoration (P<0.05); And the GCF inflammatory factor levels in group A after restoration were higher than those in groups B and C (P<0.05),but the comparison between group B and group C was not significant (P>0.05). The levels of RANKL (receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand) and RANKL/OPG (osteoprotegerin) in the three groups after restoration were higher than those before restoration,while the OPG was lower than that before restoration (P<0.05).After restoration,the nuclear factor κB receptor activating factor ligand (RANKL) and RANKL/osteoprotectin (OPG) in group A were higher than those in groups B and C,and its OPG was lower than that in the group B and group C (P<0.05).However,there was no significant difference of OPG between the two groups of B and C (P>0.05). The restoration integrity rate among the three groups did not show significant differences (P>0.05). 【Conclusion】Compared with nickel-chromium alloy,cobalt-chromium alloy and gold deposition in PFM restoration have significantly lower levels of inflammatory factors,less influence on osteoclasts,and higher biocompatibility and stability of restored teeth.
Key wordsDental Materials    Metal Ceramic Alloys    Gingival Crevicular Fluid    RANK Ligand
收稿日期: 2023-04-06     
中图分类号:  R781.4  
通讯作者: *E-mail:291351722@qq.com   
引用本文:   
马庆云, 李会斌, 段风, 张文涛. 不同修复材料对前牙PFM修复患者GCF中炎症、破骨细胞调节因子的影响[J]. 医学临床研究, 2023, 40(8): 1172-1175.
MA Qing-yun, LI Hui-bin, DUAN Feng, et al. Effects of Different Restoration Materials on Inflammation and Osteoclastic Cytokines of GCF in Anterior Teeth PFM Restoration Patients. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RESEARCH, 2023, 40(8): 1172-1175.
链接本文:  
http://journal07.magtech.org.cn/yxlcyj/CN/10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2023.08.015     或     http://journal07.magtech.org.cn/yxlcyj/CN/Y2023/V40/I8/1172
版权所有 © 2013 医学临床研究杂志社  湘ICP备13012052号-1
办公地址:湖南省长沙市芙蓉区新军路43号煤炭大院主办公楼6楼621、623、632、636室 邮编:410011 电话(传真):0731-84824007 E-mail:jcr_cs.hn@vip.163.com
技术支持:北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn