医学临床研究
  2025年7月23日 星期三           首 页    |    期刊简介    |    编委会    |    投稿指南    |    期刊订阅    |    广告合作    |    留言板    |    联系我们    |    English
医学临床研究  2019, Vol. 36 Issue (2): 273-276    DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2019.02.018
  论著 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
瘢痕子宫合并中央性前置胎盘围术期出血临床分析
邹红霞1, 白淑芳2, 张娟娟1, 王瑞1
1.西北妇女儿童医院产一科,陕西 西安 710061;
2.空军军医大学第一附属西京医院妇产科,陕西 西安 710032
Clinical Analysis of Perioperative Bleeding in Patients with Scar Uterus Complicated with Central Placenta Previa
ZOU Hong-xia, BAI Shu-fang, ZHANG Juan-juan, et al
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwest Women and Children's Hospital, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061
全文: PDF (0 KB)   HTML (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 探讨瘢痕子宫合并中央性前置胎盘患者产前、术中及术后出血及严重并发症的发生情况。方法 选取本院在2017年3月至2018年2月期间收治的、符合纳入标准的单胎瘢痕子宫合并中央性前置胎盘患者135例。根据术中胎盘与子宫附着情况,分为胎盘粘连组(n=30)、胎盘植入组(n=51)及正常组(无植入和粘连,n=54)。分析三组围术期出血及并发症发生情况,并记录处理措施。结果 胎盘植入组的术中出血量及围手术期出血量明显高于胎盘粘连组和正常组,胎盘粘连组术中出血量及围手术期出血量显著高于正常组,其差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);胎盘植入组的子宫切除率明显高于胎盘粘连组与正常组,胎盘粘连组与正常组的子宫切除率比较差异无统计学意义(P<0.05)。胎盘植入组、胎盘粘连组和正常组分别有32例、2例、2例行子宫切除,其余患者使用缝合、宫缩剂、腹主动脉球囊阻滞等对症处理止血并保留子宫。胎盘植入组中1例孕妇术中出血量达6000 mL,心脏骤停,经积极抢救、对症处理后,母婴出院。在胎盘植入组中,有15例行腹主动脉球囊阻滞,术中通过球囊充盈阻滞腹主动脉下段,15例患者中,有8例行子宫切除术,7例保守治疗,平均出血量为1142.86 mL;未行腹主动脉球囊阻滞者的平均出血量为2100 mL。结论 瘢痕子宫合并中央性前置胎盘患者具有胎盘植入率高、出血量大等特点,腹主动脉球囊阻滞能有效降低本病围手术期出血量。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
邹红霞
白淑芳
张娟娟
王瑞
关键词 子宫出血/并发症前置胎盘/病理生理学    
AbstractObjective To investigate the incidence of prenatal, intraoperative and postoperative bleeding and severe complications in patients with scar uterus complicated with central placenta previa. Methods A total of 135 patients with single-fetal scar uterus and central placenta previa who met the inclusion criteria during the period from March 2017 to February 2018 were enrolled. According to the adhesion of placenta and uterus during operation, they were divided into the placenta adhesion group (n=30), placenta implantation group (n=51) and normal group ( neither adhesion nor implantation, n=54). The perioperative bleeding, complications and treatment measures of the three groups were analyzed and recorded. Results There was no significant difference in antepartum bleeding rate between the three groups (χ2=0.22,P=0.90). The bleeding rate, perioperative bleeding rate and hysterectomy rate in the three groups were statistically different (F/χ2=72.05, 42.45, 54.64,P<0.01). The amount of intra-operation bleeding and perioperative bleeding in the placenta implantation group were significantly higher than those in the placental adhesion group and the normal group (t=6.22, 10.53, 4.50, 8.66,P<0.01). The amount of intra-operation bleeding and perioperative bleeding in the placenta adhesion group were higher than those in the normal group (t=4.81, 3.46, P<0.01). The rate of hysterectomy in the placenta-implanted group was significantly higher than that in the placenta-adhesive group and the normal group. There was no significant difference in the rate of hysterectomy between the placenta-adhesive group and the normal group (P<0.05). There were 32 cases of hysterectomy in placenta implantation group, which was significantly higher than 2 cases in placenta adhesion group and 2 cases in the normal group (χ2=22.14, 39.10,P<0.01). The other patients used suture, uterine contraction, abdominal aortic balloon block and other symptomatic treatment to stop bleeding and preserve the uterus. In the placenta-implanted group, 1 case of pregnant women had an intraoperative blood loss of 6000 mL with cardiac arrest. After active rescue and symptomatic treatment, the mother and baby in this case were saved and discharged. In the placenta-implantation group, 15 patients underwent abdominal aortic balloon block whose lower abdominal aorta was blocked by balloon filling during operation. Of the 15 patients, 8 underwent hysterectomy and 7 underwent conservative treatment. The mean amount of bleeding was 1142.86 mL while the mean amount of bleeding in patients without abdominal aortic balloon block was 2100 mL. The volume of bleeding in patients with abdominal aortic balloon obstruction decreased significantly (Z=3.58,P=0.03). Conclusion Patients with scar uterus complicated with central placenta previa have the characteristics of high placenta implantation rate and large amount of bleeding. The abdominal aorta balloon obstruction can effectively reduce the intra-operation and perioperative bleeding.
Key wordsUterine Hemorrhage/CO    Placenta Previa/PP
收稿日期: 2018-08-31     
PACS:  R711.52  
通讯作者: E-mail:h_x_zou@163.com   
引用本文:   
邹红霞, 白淑芳, 张娟娟, 王瑞. 瘢痕子宫合并中央性前置胎盘围术期出血临床分析[J]. 医学临床研究, 2019, 36(2): 273-276.
ZOU Hong-xia, BAI Shu-fang, ZHANG Juan-juan, et al. Clinical Analysis of Perioperative Bleeding in Patients with Scar Uterus Complicated with Central Placenta Previa. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 36(2): 273-276.
链接本文:  
http://journal07.magtech.org.cn/yxlcyj/CN/10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2019.02.018     或     http://journal07.magtech.org.cn/yxlcyj/CN/Y2019/V36/I2/273
版权所有 © 2013 医学临床研究杂志社  湘ICP备13012052号-1
办公地址:湖南省长沙市芙蓉区新军路43号煤炭大院主办公楼6楼621、623、632、636室 邮编:410011 电话(传真):0731-84824007 E-mail:jcr_cs.hn@vip.163.com
技术支持:北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn