Epidemiological Characteristics of 630 Patients with Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia in Shanghai to Analyze Related Factors Affecting the Time for Negative Nucleic Acid Negative Conversion
CHENG Si, ZHANG Jue, SUN Jian, et al
Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 201203
Abstract:【Objective】To analyze the epidemiological characteristics and the influencing factors of the time of nucleic acid turning negative for patients infected with the new coronavirus pneumonia Omicron variant in Shanghai, and to provide reference for the treatment of patients with new coronary pneumonia. 【Methods】The epidemiological data of 630 new coronary pneumonia cases admitted to Shanghai Huangpu Fangcang Hospital from April to May, 2022 were retrospectively studied. According to the clinical classification criteria, patients were divided into asymptomatic/mild group (n=543) and common group (n=87). Based on the chest CT imaging diagnosis results, the patients were divided into group A (no obvious abnormality in chest CT plain scan, n=208), group B (chest imaging showed multiple small patchy shadows and interstitial changes, n=335), and group C (chest imaging showed multiple ground-glass shadows and infiltration shadows in multiple lungs, n=87). Statistical analysis was carried out based on chest imaging characteristics and nucleic acid detection results. 【Results】There were significant differences in gender, age, nucleic acid gene distribution ratio, N gene Ct value and ORF gene Ct value between the asymptomatic/mild group and the common group (P<0.05). There were significant differences in age, nucleic acid gene distribution ratio, N gene Ct value and ORF gene Ct value among group A, group B and group C (P<0.05). Logistic multivariate regression analysis showed that age, N gene Ct value and ORF gene Ct value were influencing factors for the severity of pneumonia in patients (P<0.05). According to the time of nucleic acid negative conversion, patients were divided into group D (nucleic acid negative conversion time <9 d, n=5) and group E (nucleic acid negative conversion time ≥9 d, n=12). There were significant differences in age, N gene Ct value and ORF gene Ct value of patients in group D and group E (P<0.05). Logistic multivariate regression analysis showed that age, N gene Ct value and ORF gene Ct value at admission were not independent risk factors affecting the time for nucleic acid test to turn negative (all P>0.05).【Conclusion】Epidemiological characteristics of patients with new coronary pneumonia:gender, age and nucleic acid Ct value are meaningful for the clinical classification of new coronary pneumonia, but have no significant effect on the time of viral nucleic acid conversion to negative; The degree of inflammatory changes in the lungs of patients with new coronary pneumonia is related to age and viral nucleic acid content.
成思, 张珏, 孙健, 石磊. 上海市630例新型冠状病毒Omicron变异株感染者流行病学特征及影响核酸转阴时间的相关因素*[J]. 医学临床研究, 2024, 41(9): 1281-1284.
CHENG Si, ZHANG Jue, SUN Jian, et al. Epidemiological Characteristics of 630 Patients with Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia in Shanghai to Analyze Related Factors Affecting the Time for Negative Nucleic Acid Negative Conversion. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RESEARCH, 2024, 41(9): 1281-1284.
[1] FRAZER E. Coronavirus Disease 2019 Update[J].Air Med J,2021, 40(2):91. [2] 卓丽,魏芳芳,周建群,等.新型冠状病毒肺炎患者34例转归影响因素[J].实用医学杂志2020,39(14):1861-1865. [3] ZHANG X X, ZHANG W H, CHEN S J. Shanghai's life-saving efforts against the current omicron wave of the COVID-19 pandemic[J].Lancet,2022, 399(10340):2011-2012. [4] SADEGHI DOUSARI A, TAATI MOGHADAM M, SATARZADEH N. COVID-19 (Coronavirus Disease 2019):a new coronavirus disease[J].Infect Drug Resist,2020, 13:2819-2828. [5] 陈博武.上海地区新型冠状病毒奥密克戎变异株感染轻症患者中医证候特征研究[J].中医杂志,2022,63(15):1436-1441. [6] 中国国家卫生健康委员会.新型冠状病毒肺炎诊疗方案(试行第九版)[J].国际流行病学传染病学杂志, 2022,25(2):73-80. [7] LU G Z, ZHANG Y, ZHANG H C, et al. Geriatric risk and protective factors for serious COVID-19 outcomes among older adults in Shanghai Omicron wave[J].Emerg Microbes Infect,2022, 11(1):2045-2054. [8] AI J W, ZHANG H C, ZHANG Y, et al. Omicron variant showed lower neutralizing sensitivity than other SARS-CoV-2 variants to immune sera elicited by vaccines after boost[J].Emerg Microbes Infect,2022, 11(1):337-343. [9] SAMARANAYAKE L P, SENEVIRATNE C J, FAKHRUDDIN K S. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines:a concise review[J].Oral Dis,2022,28(Suppl 2):2326-2336. [10] UEYAMA H. Gender difference is associated with severity of coronavirus disease 2019 infection:an insight from a meta-analysis[J].Crit Care Explor,2020, 2(6):e0148. [11] AI T, YANG Z L, HOU H Y, et al. Correlation of chest CT and RT-PCR testing for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China:a report of 1014 cases[J].Radiology,2020, 296(2):E32. [12] INUI S, FUJIKAWA A, GONOI W, et al. Comparison of CT findings of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia caused by different major variants[J].Jpn J Radiol,2022,40(12):1246-1256. [13] HU X W, XING Y H, JIA J, et al. Factors associated with negative conversion of viral RNA in patients hospitalized with COVID-19[J].Sci Total Environ,2020, 728:138812.