两种不同入路髋关节置换术治疗强直性脊柱炎合并髋关节病变患者的疗效及对血清炎症因子水平的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2025.08.030

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (0)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (1234 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract 【Objective】To explore the efficacy of two different approaches of hip arthroplasty in the treatment of patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) complicated by hip joint lesions and their impact on serum inflammatory factor levels. 【Methods】A total of 86 patients with AS complicated by hip joint lesions who underwent hip arthroplasty in our hospital from January 2020 to January 2024 were selected. According to the different surgical approaches, they were divided into the observation group (anterior approach) and the control group (posterolateral approach), with 43 cases in each group. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, hip function score [Harris Hip Score (HHS) system], Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, serum inflammatory factor [interleukin-1 (IL-1), interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α)] levels, and hip abduction and flexion angles were compared between the two groups before and after treatment. 【Results】After treatment, the WOMAC score and VAS score of the observation group were lower than those of the control group (P<0.05). After treatment, the levels of inflammatory factors in the observation group were lower than those in the control group, and the HHS score was higher than that in the control group (P<0.05). At 1 month and 3 months after treatment, the hip abduction angle and hip flexion angle of the observation group were larger than those of the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). 【Conclusion】Compared with posterolateral approach hip arthroplasty, anterior approach hip arthroplasty has a more significant effect on improving hip function, reducing pain scores and lowering serum inflammatory factor levels in patients with AS complicated by hip joint lesions.

Key words： Spondylitis, Ankylosing Osteoarthritis, Hip Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip Chemokines

Received: 29 September 2024

PACS:

R593.23

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	HUANG Fei

Cite this article:

HUANG Fei. Efficacy of Two Different Approaches of Hip Arthroplasty in the Treatment of Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis Complicated by Hip Joint Lesions and their Impact on Serum Inflammatory Factor Levels[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RESEARCH, 2025, 42(8): 1398-1401.

URL:

http://journal07.magtech.org.cn/yxlcyj/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2025.08.030 OR http://journal07.magtech.org.cn/yxlcyj/EN/Y2025/V42/I8/1398

[1] 吕志强,李兴华. 加长柄水泥人工髋关节置换结合粗隆间重建治疗高龄股骨粗隆间骨折[J].中华实验外科杂志,2023,40(3):571-573.
[2] 衡红全,杨渊,胡雪峰,等. 前外侧入路半髋关节置换术治疗高龄股骨颈骨折的早期临床疗效[J].中华骨科杂志,2023,43(4):230-237.
[3] 中华医学会风湿病学分会.强直性脊柱炎诊断及治疗指南[J].中华风湿病学杂志,2010,14(8):557-559.
[4] 黄三明,卢翠美,章文秀.新一代股骨近端髓内钉interTAN术治疗股骨转子间骨折的临床效果[J].临床合理用药杂志,2018,11(30):136-137.
[5] 马爽,王驰,崔岩. 间歇性气压治疗联合仿生物电治疗预防人工髋关节置换术后深静脉血栓形成的疗效[J].中国医科大学学报,2023,52(4):357-360.
[6] 邓颖,金璨,段志豪,等. 类风湿关节炎骨破坏的细胞网络调控及治疗研究进展[J].中国现代医学杂志,2023,33(15):62-68.
[7] 程国华,郝晓娟,姜敏. 类风湿关节炎患者PLR、NLR、IL-27水平检测及其与疾病活动度的相关性[J].海南医学,2023,34(1):19-21.
[8] 王鑫光,何宜蓁,董子漾,等. 机器人辅助与常规全髋关节置换术早期疗效及患者满意度的比较[J].中华骨科杂志,2023,43(8):492-499.
[9] 韩升龙,孔令俊,李万潭,等. 中药单体及复方干预膝关节骨性关节炎疼痛相关信号通路研究进展[J].中国骨质疏松杂志,2023,29(10):1490-1495.
[10] 李宏宙,张涛,陈德生,等. 髋关节镜手术治疗髋臼盂唇损伤合并囊肿的临床疗效[J].中华骨科杂志,2023,43(23):1580-1586.
[11] 张帅,刘成,孔祥朋,等. 机器人辅助全髋关节置换术的临床疗效[J].中华骨科杂志,2023,43(17):1137-1145.
[12] 可雨奇,陈长健,吴浩,等. 改良直接前方入路与直接前方入路初次全髋关节置换者12个月随访结果比较[J].中国组织工程研究,2023,27(9):1377-1382.
[13] 赵红星,张超,陶金刚,等. 不同入路的髋关节置换术的早期疗效和炎性应激研究[J].中华实验外科杂志,2023,40(6):1171-1174.