|
|
Clinical Efficacy of Hysteroscopic Surgery for Type Ⅰ Cesarean Scar Pregnancy |
FANG Liping, LI Ni, REN Xiaoli |
Department of Gynecology,Xi'an High-tech Hospital,Xi'an Shaanxi 710082 |
|
|
Abstract 【Objective】To explore the clinical efficacy of hysteroscopic surgery for type Ⅰ cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) patients.【Methods】A total of 80 patients with Type Ⅰ CSP admitted to our hospital from January 2015 to October 2019 were selected. Among them,30 patients underwent hysteroscopic resection of scar pregnancy lesions (hysteroscopic group),and 50 patients underwent uterine artery embolization intervention combined with negative pressure suction curettage (curettage group). We compared the intraoperative bleeding volume,surgical time,hospital stay,lump absorption time,and postoperative uterine function related indicators [Menstrual period,menstrual volume,menstrual recovery time,human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) levels,HCG recovery time,vaginal bleeding time],Psychological changes of pregnant women before and after surgery [Self Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) score,Self Rating Depression Scale (SDS) score],and the incidence of complications. between the two groups.【Results】The intraoperative bleeding volume,surgical time,hospitalization time,menstrual recovery time,HCG recovery time,and vaginal bleeding time in the hysteroscopy group were significantly lower than those in the curettage group,with statistical significance (P<0.05). The HCG level was significantly lower than that in the curettage group,with statistical significance (P<0.05); The postoperative SAS and SDS scores of the hysteroscopy group were significantly lower than those of the same group before and after the curettage group,and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05); The incidence of complications in the hysteroscopy group was 10.00%,and there was no statistically significant difference compared to the 14.00% in the curettage group (P>0.05).【Conclusion】Compared with interventional embolization combined with curettage,hysteroscopic surgery has a better therapeutic effect on Type Ⅰ CSP,with fast recovery of uterine function and healthy psychological state,which is worthy of clinical promotion.
|
Received: 09 October 2022
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 郭卫,杨雪.马来酸麦角新碱联合卡贝缩宫素治疗瘢痕子宫妊娠剖宫产术后出血产妇的临床效果及对凝血指标的影响[J].医学临床研究,2023,40(4):609-611.
[2] TUMENJARGAL A,TOKUE H,KISHI H,et al. Uterine artery embolization combined with dilation and curettage for the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy: efficacy and future fertility[J].Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol,2018,41(8):1165-1173.
[3] 胡玉芹,刘萍,梁伟国,等. 子宫动脉栓塞术后清宫与腹腔镜下病灶切除术在子宫瘢痕妊娠治疗中的应用[J].河北医科大学学报,2015,36(9):1026.
[4] ÖZCAN H Ç,UĞUR M G,ÖZCAN BALAT,et al. Is ultrasound-guided suction curettage a reliable option for treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy? A cross-sectional retrospective study[J].J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med,2018,31(22):2953-2958.
[5] 顾祝新,黄健,赵辉. 子宫瘢痕妊娠的诊治进展[J].介入放射学杂志,2015,24(8):96-99.
[6] 金力,陈蔚琳,周应芳. 剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠诊治专家共识(2016)[J].全科医学临床与教育,2017,1(15):5-9.
[7] 中华医学会计划生育学分会. 剖宫产瘢痕妊娠诊断与治疗共识[J].中华医学杂志,2012,92(25):1731-1733.
[8] 张福娥,李娟.甲氨蝶呤联合子宫动脉栓塞对瘢痕妊娠患者清宫术疗效的影响[J].医学临床研究,2022,39(4):514-516.
[9] 李佳浍,王倩. 宫腔镜病灶切除术对内生型剖宫产瘢痕妊娠患者术后生活质量及并发症发生率的影响[J].国际医药卫生导报,2018,24(3):348-351.
[10] 肖卓妮,杨菁,徐望明. 剖宫产瘢痕妊娠治疗策略的临床疗效及并发症发生情况研究[J].中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版),2019,15(1):31-38.
[11] 曹莉莉. 阴道B超可视人流术对剖宫产瘢痕子宫再妊娠患者并发症及生活质量的影响[J].实用临床医药杂志,2019,23(6):40-43.
[12] 赵丽平.宫腔镜手术对剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠的治疗效果[J].临床医学,2018,38(6):76-77.
[13] 杨益,张力尹,陈艳,等.联用甲氨蝶呤和宫腔镜电切术治疗子宫瘢痕部位妊娠的效果研究[J].当代医药论丛,2018,16(8):83-84.
[14] 何文姝. 宫腔镜在剖宫产瘢痕妊娠和宫颈妊娠治疗中的应用价值[J].中国当代医药,2018,25(20):88-90.
[15] 郑立. 宫腔镜联合子宫动脉栓塞术在剖宫产切口瘢痕妊娠中应用的效果评价[J].中国医疗器械信息,2018,24(12):59.
[16] 成华艳,陈春玲,陈琼英,等.二胎瘢痕子宫孕妇孕期焦虑状况及影响因素分析[J].重庆医学,2019,48(19):3384-3386. |
[1] |
. [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RESEARCH, 2023, 40(9): 1406-1408. |
|
|
|
|