超声引导下及CT引导下经皮肺穿刺活检术用于肺外周病变的应用价值

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2023.07.014

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (0)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (1171 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract 【Objective】To explore the diagnostic efficacy of ultrasound-guided and CT-guided percutaneous lung biopsy for peripheral lung lesions. 【Methods】A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 96 patients admitted to our hospital from March 2019 to March 2022 who were diagnosed with peripheral lung lesions through imaging examinations. They were divided into ultrasound-guided group and CT-guided group based on different guided biopsy methods, with 48 patients in each group. We compared the success rate, diagnosis rate, and pathological results of two groups of biopsies, as well as the total time, effective time, and average depth of puncture biopsy between the two groups. The incidence of complications during puncture biopsy were compared between the two groups. 【Results】There was no statistically significant difference in the success rate, diagnosis rate, and pathological results between the two groups (P>0.05). The total time, effective time, and average depth of puncture biopsy in the ultrasound-guided group were lower than those in the CT-guided group, with statistically significant differences (P＜0.05). The total incidence of complications in the ultrasound-guided puncture biopsy group was 6.25% (3/48), which was lower than 20.83% (10/48) in the CT-guided group, with a statistically significant difference(χ²=4.360,P=0.037). 【Conclusion】 Both ultrasound-guided and CT-guided percutaneous lung biopsies have higher diagnostic efficacy for peripheral lung lesions, and the incidence of complications in ultrasound-guided percutaneous lung biopsy is relatively low.

Key words： Lung Neoplasms/DI Ultrasonography Punctures/MT Tomography, Spiral Computed

Received: 02 September 2022

PACS:

R734.2

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	SHANG Na
	WANG Jun-hu
	LIU Xin-yu
	et al

Cite this article:

SHANG Na,WANG Jun-hu,LIU Xin-yu, et al. Diagnostic Efficacy of Ultrasound-guided and CT-guided Percutaneous Lung Biopsy for Peripheral Lung Lesions[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RESEARCH, 2023, 40(7): 1011-1013.

URL:

http://journal07.magtech.org.cn/yxlcyj/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2023.07.014 OR http://journal07.magtech.org.cn/yxlcyj/EN/Y2023/V40/I7/1011

[1] 李威,周勇,游锦智,等.3D及2D胸腔镜模式下肺癌根治术对肺癌患者围术期免疫功能的影响[J].医学临床研究,2022,39(8):1186-1189.
[2] 孙燕. 肺癌流行病学与肺癌预防[J].中国肺癌杂志,2000,3(6):404-405.
[3] 刘静, 黄鑫, 袁爽, 等. 超声造影在周围型肺及胸膜肿块病变诊断和穿刺活检中的应用价值[J].武汉大学学报(医学版), 2017, 38(1):57-60.
[4] 陈轸,彭开兵.彩超与CT引导下经皮肺穿刺活检在周围型肺部肿块诊断中的应用[J].中国CT和MRI杂志, 2015,13(10):43-46.
[5] 刘红梅,刘世专,孙成晖,等. 超声与CT引导下经皮肺穿刺活检诊断周围型肺癌一针阳性率临床对比研究[J].中国医药科学, 2019,9(3):107-109.
[6] 刘春平, 陈朱诚, 顾莹莹,等. 173例经支气管镜冷冻肺活检在弥漫性肺疾病中的病理诊断分析[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志, 2020, 43(3):228-233.
[7] 张哲民. 经皮肺穿刺和电子气管镜下经支气管肺活检对肺部周围性病变的诊断价值[J].中国内镜杂志,2005,11(12):1257-1260.
[8] 王晓燕,刘政,谭开彬,等.超声引导经皮穿刺活检诊断肺周围型病变的应用价值[J].重庆医学,2013,42(35):4260-4261.
[9] 姜思,汤庆, 汤佳馨, 等. 超声引导与CT引导穿刺活组织检查对周围型肺结节的诊断价值[J].临床与病理杂志, 2018,38(2):324-328.
[10] 周国永, 梁树生, 张翠禄, 等. CT引导下经皮肺穿刺活检术在肺外周病变的临床价值探讨[J].中国临床新医学, 2017,10(10):972-975.
[11] 田路稳,邵伯云,吴震,等.CT引导下经皮穿刺肺活检对肺外周病灶的诊断价值[J].山东医药,2009,49(12):100.
[12] 王昌国, 曾大雄, 雷伟,等. CT引导下经皮肺穿刺与超声引导下经支气管镜肺活检对肺周围型病变的诊断价值[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志, 2015,38(12):897-900.
[13] 魏炜,艾红,阮骊韬. 超声引导下经皮肺穿刺活检术诊断边缘性肺病变[J].中国介入影像与治疗学,2011,8(2):129-131.
[14] 丁腾云, 张超学, 江子丰,等. 对比分析彩色多普勒超声与CT引导经皮肺穿刺在肺周围病变诊断中的应用价值[J].实用医学杂志, 2018, 34(7):1191-1194.