单绒毛膜双羊膜囊双胎并发选择性宫内生长受限的预后分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2020.12.004

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (11)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract 【Objective】To investigate the prognosis of selective intrauterine growth restriction (sIUGR) in MCDA twin pregnancy. 【Methods】A total of 85 cases of MCDA pregnancy with sIUGR diagnosed and treated in our hospital from January 2018 to December 2019 were selected as the observation group, and 79 cases of normal pregnancy in the same period were selected as the control group. The prognosis of the normal group and the sIUGR group was compared. 【Results】The gestational weeks of delivery in the sIUGR group were earlier than those in the normal group, the difference in birth weight was greater than that in the normal group, and the incidence of intrauterine death (IUFD) was higher than that in the normal group (P<0.01); the gestational weeks of delivery in the type Ⅱ sIUGR group were earlier than those in type Ⅰ and type Ⅲ, the difference of birth weight was greater than that of type Ⅰ and type Ⅲ, and the incidence of IUFD was higher than that of type Ⅰ and Ⅲ (P<0.01).The incidence of abnormal umbilical cord in the sIUGR group was higher than that in the normal group. 【Conclusion】The prognosis of MCDA twins complicated with sIUGR is poor. The incidence of preterm birth, poor birth weight and intrauterine mortality rate of small fetus are higher in type Ⅱ sIUGR twins. Ultrasonography can accurately classify sIUGR and has important value for clinical prognosis evaluation.

Key words： Fetal Growth Retardation Twins, Monozygotic Ultrasonography, Prenatal Pregnancy Outcome Prognosis

Received: 20 May 2020

PACS:

R714.7

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors

Cite this article:

URL:

http://journal07.magtech.org.cn/yxlcyj/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2020.12.004 OR http://journal07.magtech.org.cn/yxlcyj/EN/Y2020/V37/I12/1776

[1] Vanderheyden TM, Fichera A, Pasquini L, et al. Increased latency of absent end-diastolic flow in the umbilical artery of monochorionic twin fetuses[J].Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2005, 26(1): 44-49.
[2] Ishii K, Murakoshi T, Takahashi Y, et al. Perinatal outcome of monochorionic twins with selective intrauterine growth restriction and different types of umbilical artery Doppler under expectant management[J].Fetal Diagn Ther,2009, 26(3): 157-161.
[3] Dan-V Valsky, Eixarch Elisenda, Martinez Josep-Maria, et al.Selective intrauterine growth restriction in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies[J].Prenatal Diagnosis,2010, 30(8): 719-726.
[4] 赵晓利,李玲,高庆,等. 不同类型单绒毛膜双羊膜囊双胎并发选择性宫内生长受限胎儿的妊娠结局及预后对比[J].中国医师进修杂志, 2014, 37(33): 34-37.
[5] 祝彩霞,刘培培,王冬昱,等. 不同绒毛膜性双胎妊娠的早产原因及其影响因素[J].中华围产医学杂志, 2016, 19(4): 269-273.
[6] 卫星,孙路明. 单绒毛膜性双胎并发选择性生长受限的热点问题[J].中国医刊, 2017, 52(5): 4-6.
[7] A-L Fick, Feldstein V-A, Norton M-E, et al. Unequal placental sharing and birth weight discordance in monochorionic diamniotic twins[J].Am J Obstet Gynecol,2006, 195(1): 178-183.
[8] S Chu, Mao Q, Shapiro S, et al. Correlation between cord insertion type and chorionic villus vascularization of the co-twin in diamniotic-monochorionic twin pregnancies[J].Early Hum Dev,2013, 89(4): 243-247.
[9] 饶洪杰,柏艳红. 彩色多普勒超声在诊断帆状胎盘及预测母婴结局中的应用[J].医学临床研究, 2019, 36(7): 1421-1423.
[10] L-Y Wee, Taylor M-J, Vanderheyden T, et al. Transmitted arterio-arterial anastomosis waveforms causing cyclically intermittent absent/reversed end-diastolic umbilical artery flow in monochorionic twins[J].Placenta,2003, 24(7): 772-778.
[11] M-A Rustico, Consonni D, Lanna M, et al. Selective intrauterine growth restriction in monochorionic twins: changing patterns in umbilical artery Doppler flow and outcomes[J].Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2017, 49(3): 387-393.