|
|
Effect of Free and Traditional Postures of Primipara during the Second Stage of Painless Labor on Pregnancy Outcomes |
WANG Wen-yi, CUI Lei, LIU Zhi-hui |
Department of Obstetrics and gynecology , Beijing Chaoyang Maternal and Child-Care Centre,Beijing 100021 |
|
|
Abstract Objective To investigate the effect of free posture and traditional position of primipara during the second stage of painless labor on pregnancy outcomes. Methods A total of 120 primiparas were randomly divided into the free group and the traditional group, with 60 cases in each group. The prenatal intervention of the two groups was the same, and they were given spinal anesthesia of painless labor. When entering the second stage of labor, the traditional group adopted the traditional supine before delivery while the free group adopted free position. Comparisons were made between the two groups in terms of labor process, pregnancy outcome, complications, postpartum subjective pain and sense of delivery control. Results The second stage of labor in the free group was significantly shorter than that in the traditional group (P<0.05), and the incidence of abnormal fetal heart rate in the second stage of labor was significantly lower than that in the traditional group. The improvement time of abnormal fetal heart rate was significantly shorter than that in the traditional group (P<0.05). The natural delivery rate of primipara in the free group was significantly higher than that in the traditional group, and the transit cesarean section rate was significantly lower than that in the traditional group (P<0.05). Compared to the traditional group, the incidences of lateral perineal excision, postpartum discomfort, tension urinary incontinence and neonatal asphyxia were significantly lower in the free group (P<0.05). The pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score of subjective delivery in the free group was significantly lower than that in the traditional group, and the parturition control (LAS) score was significantly higher than that in the traditional group (P<0.05). Conclusion Compared to the traditional position, the free posture during the second stage of primipara painless labor can shorten the labor time, improve the rate of natural delivery and reduce maternal and neonatal complications. Thus, it can further reduce labor pain and improve parturition control.
|
Received: 31 May 2018
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 刘利颜,霍杏婵,沈健.自由体位待产及分娩对活跃期初产妇分娩结局的影响分析[J].中国医药科学,2016,6(6):49-51. [2] 张晓丽,张惠欣,蒋睿,等.不同体位分娩对妊娠结局的临床观察[J].中国妇幼保健,2016,31(9):1814-1816. [3] 厉跃红,吴娜,庄薇.分娩球配合自由体位助产对初产妇产痛、分娩控制感及妊娠结局的影响[J].中华护理杂志,2013,48(9):793-796. [4] 郑立霞.不同体位分娩对母婴结局的影响[J].中国妇幼保健,2015,30(22):3796-3798. [5] 樊雪梅,周春秀,刘婧岩,等.分娩镇痛联合自由体位分娩对初产妇分娩结局的影响[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2016,22(6):12-14. [6] 谢英霞,刘明珍,张美霞,等.拉玛泽呼吸法联合无创自由体位分娩对孕产妇心理状况及分娩质量的影响[J].护理实践与研究,2017,14(12):70-71. [7] 刘梦晓,罗庆平.自由体位分娩法和分娩减痛法在初产顺产妇分娩结局中的临床效果[J].河北医学,2016,22(3):436-438. [8] 马燕如.低危初产妇第一产程采用自由体位对分娩及产程的影响[J].中国妇幼保健,2017,32(17):4103-4106. [9] 祁志宇,张殿尧,党翠玲,等.产时合理选择分娩体位及自然娩肩对妊娠结局和母体产后恢复的临床研究[J].河北医药,2016,38(8):1215-1219. [10] 梁媛,刘洁玲,詹晓兰.自由体位与传统卧位对正常初产妇产程中产科质量和母婴并发症的影响[J].浙江临床医学,2016,18(5):843-844. |
[1] |
. [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 36(2): 377-378. |
|
|
|
|